CA media finds de Leon guilty of not being Steinberg

CA media finds de Leon guilty of not being Steinberg

kevin.de.leonThere has been steady turnover in the leadership of the state Assembly every few years, so there is plenty of evidence that most new speakers get the equivalent of a honeymoon. Certainly that’s been true of current Speaker Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, and the two Los Angeles Democrats who preceded her, John Perez and Karen Bass.

But the state Senate has had only Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, as president from 2008 until a few weeks ago. Steinberg left to media accolades this fall. Note this long Q&A in which the Bee reporter’s framing is consistently favorable to the former teacher.

Yet his successor, Sen. Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, is off to the roughest start of any Californian assuming a high-profile office since Lane Kiffin took over as coach of the Oakland Raiders.

De Leon has gotten skeptical to scathing media responses for a relatively long list of things in a relatively short time.

More perceived screw-ups since Walters tore him up

On Dec. 4, Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Walters blasted him for a “series of blunders.”

Walters ripped de Leon for verbal gaffes that proved hugely damaging to a Central Valley Assembly Democratic hopeful; for a self-important, pompous “inaugural” ceremony in Los Angeles; and for gutting many of the Senate’s most experienced policy analysts because of murky budget problems. Insiders said if the Senate really were hurting, the logical thing to do was lay off the political apparatchiks on all Senate staffs, not the people with the institutional memory.

The knocks have kept coming since Dec. 4.

De Leon’s announcement last week that he would pressure CalPERS and CalSTRS to disinvest from coal-affiliated companies — but not those in oil or natural gas — struck a chord in the wrong way with just about everyone.

I talked to one insider who said there was disbelief among lawmakers that 1) this symbolic, hollow gesture was highlighted as an early priority of de Leon’s and 2) that de Leon wouldn’t realize this would seem insubstantial and not worthy of his time. Another Sacramento watcher told me he couldn’t believe de Leon would focus on this trivia instead of grabbing a chance to be enviros’ hero by talking up a fracking ban. New York state’s passage of such a ban last week shows how much it’s where greens want to go.

Oversight office abruptly scrapped

Then de Leon was pulverized last week by editorials in both the Bay Area Newspaper Group and its sister Los Angeles News Group over other actions as well. This is from the Vallejo Times-Herald’s version:

“De León has eliminated a team of Senate aides dedicated to evaluating state government institutions and programs. He declined to renew the Senate’s Office of Oversight and Outcomes, established in 2008 by then-Senate President Darrell Steinberg with a goal “to ensure taxpayer dollars are being spent wisely and productively.

“The four-person staff’s combined salaries of about $379,000 seemed a small price for the good it did.

“Among the reports the office produced just last year were ones on the misuse of student meal funds by school districts, including $158 million in misappropriations and unallowable charges by Los Angeles Unified; about how the state’s system for overseeing substance-abuse counselors failed to flag sex offenders; and assigning blame for problems with the $373 million state payroll system. Among earlier reports was one looking at 10 tax breaks that, over a decade, cost state coffers $6.3 billion more than anticipated.”

Accused of wide range of political sins

What’s interesting is that these criticisms of de Leon don’t just focus on money-grubbing or another particular sin that politicians sometime specialize in. Implicitly, they make quite a sweeping case.

In possibly costing an Assembly candidate a chance at victory, de Leon is accused of poor political acumen.

In staging a showy unofficial “inaugural,” de Leon is accused of grandiosity.

In his Senate shakeups, de Leon is accused in one of a power grab and, in the other, of showing ignorance of the importance of a new but respected Sacramento institution.

In thinking that going after coal while ignoring fracking would make him look good, de Leon is accused of — to be blunt — stupidity.

The Sacramento version of the Stockholm syndrome

That is a pretty sweeping bill of particulars. What’s going on here?

The most obvious problem is that de Leon is politically tone-deaf in a way that’s striking for someone who’s made such a rapid ascent.

But the less obvious problem is that a lot of times it’s not fun to cover politics. It feels sleazy, disheartening, transactional, petty and repetitive. Steinberg made it feel more principled and sincerely, earnestly progressive.

That mattered to a bigger chunk of the Sacramento media-political establishment than people far from the state Capitol might imagine. This establishment didn’t miss Steinberg’s, er, colorful predecessor Don Perata at all.

8 comments

Write a comment
  1. Tom King
    Tom King 22 December, 2014, 15:30

    Bet you dollars to donuts this liberal goes to prison before he terms out.

    Reply this comment
  2. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 22 December, 2014, 19:34

    Nope.

    United States Attorney General.

    Reply this comment
  3. eck
    eck 22 December, 2014, 20:19

    I think all of this just perfectly illustrates the problem and fallacies of “term limits” They have made things worse. We just get a bunch of (morons, in my opinion) who get in because the other guy can’t. Then, because they’re pol pros, they’ve got to move up, or get real productive jobs. So that results in proposing “their” things, usually radical, to get name recognition. They need to show they’re “doing something important”. Not necessarily so of the long time incumbents.

    Reply this comment
    • eck
      eck 22 December, 2014, 20:20

      By the way, this does mean that I think there’s not a problem. There is.

      Reply this comment
  4. John Galt
    John Galt 23 December, 2014, 15:24

    It will be interesting when the authorities ultimately deport this joker for being illegally in this country. Ask him to produce an official birth certificate or his naturalization papers ….. Que?

    Reply this comment
    • SeeSaw
      SeeSaw 24 December, 2014, 11:19

      This person is a natural born U.S. citizen. Where do you come off spouting such ignorant rhetoric!

      Reply this comment
  5. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 23 December, 2014, 23:32

    Papers are meaningless. Being here is enough. These immigrants work hard and will move up quickly and be assets to California.

    Embrace change and start working hard or you will be left rockin on your single wide porch.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Whale-sex ban spurs mockery of Coastal Commission

The release of a 2013 documentary, “Blackfish,” that accused SeaWorld theme parks of treating their captive killer whales cruelly put

Judge: Pensions can’t be cut, but pay can

California still is a long way from resolving its pension crisis, in the courts and elsewhere. But here’s an important

Coalition backing CA bullet train is fraying

Both in California and Washington, D.C., backers of the state’s controversy-plagued $68 billion bullet-train project are coming off a rough