Democrats’ congressional wins delay supermajority

Nov. 8, 2012

By John Hrabe

On Tuesday night, Democrats shocked the Capitol by seizing two-thirds control of the state Assembly.  With it comes the power to override the governor and raise taxes.

“Everyone was looking at the likelihood that the state Senate would reach the sought two-thirds majority for Democrats,” wrote Scott Lay, publisher of Around the Capitol. “But from the day the maps were finalized [in the state redistricting], it was speculated that it would take a few cycles for the lower house.”

A few contests remain close and could change with late absentee and provisional ballots. But, if the results remain as they currently stand, Democrats will hold 28 seats in the state Senate and 54 seats in the State Assembly. Democrats have the supermajority they’ve long-coveted.

Well, not quite.

As CalWatchDog.com predicted in June, two even-numbered Democratic state senators have gummed up the party’s plans for total domination by winning seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. State Senators Gloria Negrete McLeod and Juan Vargas are both headed to Congress and will need to resign their state senate seats. The seats will remain vacant until filled by special elections. Consequently, the Democratic Senate caucus will be reduced by two members and consist of just 26 votes. That’s one short of the two-thirds threshold.

“The vacancies do not change the threshold for the two-thirds requirement, which is 27 seats in the Senate,” Bernadette McNulty, chief assistant secretary of the Senate, confirmed to CalWatchDog.com earlier this year. In other words, Democrats did too well on Tuesday. They won too many races.

Chain Reaction: Democratic Vacancies

Depending on how quickly the senators resign and when Gov. Jerry Brown calls a special election, it could take up to four months to fill the vacant seats and bring Senate Democrats back up to full strength. In 2011, it took approximately 16 weeks for then-Assemblyman Ted Gaines to fill a vacant state Senate seat.

And the fun doesn’t stop there. Next year could be filled with numerous special elections. In the process of filling Senate seats, there could be vacancies in the state Assembly. After all, the strongest contenders in an abbreviated campaign would be members of the state’s lower house, who have built-in name identification and a proven fundraising network. Every seat picked up by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, could be a direct loss for Assembly Speaker John Perez, D-Los Angeles.

State Senate 40: Hueso Favorite to Replace Vargas

In the campaign to replace Vargas, the UT San Diego reported this summer that Assemblyman Ben Hueso, D- San Diego, was “the most common name bandied about for who might run.” At the time, Hueso coyly said, “I’ll be one of those people looking at it [after the election].”

According to the California Citizens Redistricting Commission’s profile of the district, “SD 40 is based on nesting AD 79 and AD 80 and consists of a two-county district stretching from all of Imperial County to lower San Diego County, along its shared international border with Mexico.”  Hueso currently represents the 80th Assembly District. The 79th district will be represented by newly elected Assemblywoman Shirley Weber.  It is unlikely that she would run for the Senate seat after just winning a seat in the lower house.

If Hueso moved up to the Senate, it would trigger another special election to fill his vacant Assembly seat. This time, Speaker Perez and Assembly Democrats would be temporarily down one vote for up to four months until the seat could be filled.

State Senate 32: Two New Members

Negrete McLeod’s replacement is less clear, in part, because her victory was more unexpected. She defeated fellow Democrat Rep. Joe Baca, who has held a seat in Congress since 1999. Baca was targeted by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Independence USA PAC. The out-of-state super PAC spent more than $3.3 million in one of California’s new intra-party feuds. According to the Wall Street Journal, “The mayor spent more than four times as much as the two candidates spent combined.”

The California Citizens Redistricting Commission created the 32nd Senate district by nesting the 57th and 58th Assembly districts. Both seats will be filled by newly-elected members of the Assembly, Ian Charles Calderon and Cristina Garcia. Both have yet to serve a day in the lower house, which would make it difficult to immediately launch another campaign for the Senate.

The best positioned candidates might be the two losers from the primaries: former Assemblyman Rudy Bermudez in the 57th Assembly District and former Assemblyman Tom Calderon in the 58th Assembly District. Both men lost close primary elections in June, but retain financial and political support from their days in Sacramento.

Or, in another odd twist, Baca could decide to run for the seat being vacated by his replacement, Negrete McLeod. Before being elected to Congress, Baca represented the 32nd district in the state Senate, although the lines have changed twice since his time in Sacramento.

So what does all of this mean for taxpayers?

Jon Coupal, president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, believes the Democrats’ supermajority will “create a dangerous, one-party rule” in California.

“They say that absolute power corrupts absolutely,” Coupal told the Sacramento Bee. “I think we’re in significant danger of that in California.”

The danger might be real, but it will be delayed by the Democrats’ success. The party has been hoisted with its own petard.

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. Michael Warnken
    Michael Warnken 8 November, 2012, 15:45

    Having one party making all the decisions is daunting. Politics generally does not know restraint!

    Reply this comment
  2. Skeptical
    Skeptical 11 November, 2012, 11:40

    The supermajority means that the social progessives in Sacramento with no restrictions OWN THE STATE FISCAL MESS IN TOTAL and have ABSOLUTELY NO PROTECTION from voter/taxpayer backlash if and when tax increases are shoved down the California taxpayers throats. Progressives have stonewalled the acceptance of fiscal responsibility, or any efforts to scale back the 369 department bureaucracy they have created. I might add pension-expensive bureaucracy that ends up micromanaging as wide a range of individual daily-life concerns as it can.
    When the resident voters and tax payers, who assumed they only have prospects of paying state debt in their personal financial future, realize the entitlement gimmies are not free and will be paid by them, their reaction should be swift.
    Once again, MONEY DOES NOT CARE!
    Martial law and emergency-driven dictotorships dont work when the citizenry is armed either.

    Watching a jackass ride the tiger seems unavoidable, and could be entertaining but for the tragic possibilities.

    Reply this comment
  3. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 14 November, 2012, 19:58

    I wonder if any other state has a super majority????

    I know only a few have the 2/3’s majority to raise taxes.

    Reply this comment
  4. Richard M. Mathews
    Richard M. Mathews 25 November, 2012, 13:31

    This article is wrong and should be retracted.

    Even ignoring Galgiani’s come-from-behind win, we would have had a Senate split of 28-12. Creating two vacancies makes that 26-12. While 26 is not two-thirds of 40, it is two-thirds of 38. Vacancies do not count because votes are based on “two thirds of the membership.” Adding Galgiani, makes it 27-11, or 71%.

    The same happens in the Assembly. The margin at the beginning of the term will be 54-26. If Democrats were to lose two Assembly members, say to having them fill the Senate seats, it would be 52-26 until the vacancies are filled. That leave Democrats with exactly two-thirds of the remaining membership of 78. On the other hand, if one of those hypothetical Assembly members were replaced by Republicans, only then would there not be a two-thirds super-majority. Since Hueso’s seat is heavily Democratic and other current Assembly members in those regions are not likely to move up, the Democratic super majority appears safe for the foreseeable future.

    Reply this comment
  5. CalWatchdog
    CalWatchdog Author 26 November, 2012, 08:15

    Mr. Mathews: According to Dan Walters, “The votes might be there when the two vacant Senate seats are filled, but if even one Democratic Assembly member moves up to the Senate, it would suspend the party’s supermajority in that house until the vacancy is filled by another special election.

    “Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Curren Price is almost certain to resign from the Senate by June to take a seat on the Los Angeles City Council, which would spark another special election. If it were to be won by a Democratic Assembly member, there would be still another Assembly vacancy.”

    http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/26/5010029/dan-walters-democratic-power-in.html#mi_rss=Dan%20Walters#storylink=cpy

    — John Seiler

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

No, CA not thriving: Double-whammy from U-T San Diego

June 2, 2013 By Chris Reed The newly in-vogue theory in the national media and in the particularly stupid wings

New Guv, New Website

Anthony Pignataro: Jerry Brown doesn’t get officially sworn in as Governor of California until 11 a.m. today, but the California

Post-pension reform law, let the public employee gaming begin

Dec. 5, 2012 By Chris Reed This Orange County Register story about top executives at the giant Metropolitan Water District