Wanted: Education reporters who know about, well, education

Feb. 18, 2013

By Chris Reed

Shouldn’t education be covered by people who know a lot about education? About the history of public schools in the U.S. and what triggered the education reform movement in the early 1980s?

That’s not a lot to ask. But it evidently is not a concept grasped by the San Jose Mercury News and the Bay Area News Group, which over the weekend posted a story with this jaw-dropping lead paragraph:

“Jerry Brown is pushing an appealing idea: Local control for local schools.”

Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it

This may be appealing to people who don’t follow school issues. But it isn’t appealing to those who know the topic of education, a group that doesn’t appear to include SJMN reporter Sharon Noguchi. As I wrote last month for CalWatchdog, Brown is ignoring history:

“Local control of public schools — and the stagnation, complacency and deference to the interests of adult employees it typically yields — is what drove the two big moments in U.S. education reform history. How can Jerry not know this?

“The first pivotal moment came in 1983 when the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Excellence released ‘A Nation at Risk,’ a report on the state of public schools with an instantly famous admonition on its first page:

“’If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.’”

“The report powerfully and at great length detailed the inertia and resistance to new approaches, technologies, standards and measurement of student and teacher performance in local school districts.

“But of all the report’s recommendations, the one that was adopted most enthusiastically was the call for higher education funding. Why? Usually because of inertia and resistance to change. More money? Good! Higher standards, higher expectations, measuring student and teacher performance? Bad! …

“By the late 1990s, education reform was again a hot topic, and in both parties. After George W. Bush’s election in 2000, the president worked with Sen. Ted Kennedy on a new federal push for education reform, which ended up being the No Child Left Behind legislation. That NCLB has had a mixed record doesn’t discount the motives driving it. What were they?

“The single biggest factor was the sense that public schools were stuck in a time warp, with far too many school districts delivering unchallenging, substandard educations suitable for a low-skill workforce in a low-tech economy. This is from a 2004 academic study of NCLB:

“’Staff members [in the Bush administration] concluded that many present-day educational systems were still attempting to serve a population that has not existed since the 1950s. In 1950, the U.S. workforce consisted of 20% professionals and 20% skilled laborers. The remaining 60% consisted of unskilled labor (Sclafani, 2002). For this 60%, academic success was not a prerequisite for life success. Students who dropped out of school or who failed to achieve basic competencies could still expect to find gainful employment and, basically, enjoy the American dream.

“’By 2000, such was not the case. In 2000, 20% of the workforce was still composed of professionals. However, only 20% was composed of unskilled labor; and 60% was composed of skilled labor (Sclafani, 2002). A substantial increase in immigrants to the U.S. during this same time span created a job market in which competition was fierce for low-paying unskilled jobs. Clearly, US students who sought the American dream could no longer leave school without a diploma or be socially promoted from grade to grade without demonstrated improvement. Education and success now had become officially linked.’”

“Against this backdrop, it is mind-boggling that Jerry Brown thinks local control is the recipe for empowering schools. Instead, it is the recipe for (further) empowering teachers unions, which are almost always the most powerful force at the local level.”

Jerry Brown: Going backwards equals reform

Sharon Noguchi evidently missed all this history. Readers of the Bay Area News Group’s newspapers deserve much better.

For that matter, Californians deserve far better from Jerry Brown. It remains bizarre that he sees local control of schools as 1) something that hasn’t been tried; and 2) something that’s likely to work.

 

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 18 February, 2013, 15:44

    If Santayana was right (and he was, of course) we are ultimately doomed.

    We’ve all seen the surveys…….Barely half of graduating seniors know our first President (fittingly , I suppose, that this story appears on President’s Day), one-third think Russia or Germany were belligerents in the Civil War, etc.

    I doubt if any major K-12 subject has suffered more from the ravages of political correctness in the past generation than History, and especially American History. The under-30 crowd almost universally believes: “If it happened before 1990….who cares?”

    Except Che. Che is immortal……..LOL

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Hillary's July 4 conversion

Steven Greenhut: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, during her tour of Eastern Europe, warned, “[W]e must be wary of the

Asian-Americans halt CA affirmative action revival

As many Californians are well aware, more than half of students at UCLA and UC Berkeley are Asian or Asian-American.

Moneymaking San Diego air show victim of budget theater

First we had sequester theater, in which the Obama administration chose to make mandatory minor cuts in the federal budget