Did Gov. Brown really cut staff costs?

Brown, Face the Nation, April 29, 2012March 31, 2013

By Wayne Lusvardi 

Gov. Jerry Brown has received a lot of media attention lately with his news release that he cut his personal staff budget by about 50 percent compared to his predecessor, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.  

In an attempt to fact check Brown’s claim, this writer sent the following email to Brown’s public relations staff as well as a request made by telephone: 

Email sent March 27, 2013 at 10:16 a.m.: 

“1. Where did the staff that was cut back from 185 under Gov. Schwarzenegger to 81 under Gov. Brown go? Were they laid off?  Transferred to other different jobs?  Or were they just placed on budgets of other departments but still working in same capacity for governor?  

“2. How much in Special Funds and General Funds were used to fund Gov. Brown’s staff in 2013?   

“3. What are the revenue sources used for the Central Service Cost Recovery Fund: bonds, water bond revenues, special fund borrowings, etc?   

“4.  How much did Gov. Brown rely on General Funds and Central Service Cost Recovery Funds to pay his staffing costs in 2013?  How much did Gov. Schwarzenegger depend on General Funds and Central Service Cost Recovery Funds or Special Funds to fund his staff in 2009-10?” 

As of the publication of this article, Brown’s staff failed to respond to the above questions. The requested deadline for receiving the information was 5 p.m. March 27.  At issue are the 111 staff reductions that Brown claims he made since 2010: 

Governor’s Office Staff Reductions — 2010, 2012, 2014

Year

 

Governor

No. of Positions

No. Positions Claimed to be Reduced

Amount Funding (in millions dollars)

Sources of Funding

2009-10

Schwarzenegger

185

——–

$19.098

Undisclosed

2011-12

Brown

74

111

$9.972

Undisclosed

2013-14

Brown

81

+ 7

$12.485

Undisclosed

What happened to the 111 staff reductions Brown claims remains unverified.  Were they laid off or merely transferred to other state departments?  How many employees retired?   How many open positions where no one was hired yet were reduced? 

We don’t know the answers to these questions because Brown’s staff has failed to disclose what really happened. 

Money transfering? 

The official budget documents for 2010, 2012, and 2014 found online indicate that Brown shifted about 20 percent of his staff costs from the state General Fund to the Central Service Agency FundAssembly Bill 1389 (Senate Budget Committee) created the Central Service Agency Fund in 2008. The Central Service Agency Fund is essentially a device to transfer bond funds, special fund revenues and/or borrowings from special funds for transfers into the General Fund. 

Reported Sources of Staff Funding — California Governor’s Office

Year

General Funds

Central Service Cost Recovery Fund

Total

 

 

Millions Dollars

Percent

Millions Dollars

Percent

 

2011-12

$7.946

78.3%

$2.206

21.7%

$10.152

2012-13

$10.208

81.8%

$2.277

18.2%

$12.485

2013-14

$10.609

82.6%

$2.239

17.4%

$12.848

As shown in the table above, the Central Service Agency Fund only accounts for about 17 to 21 percent of the governor’s staff costs.  How Brown cut about 50 percent of his staff costs remains an unanswered question. 

As reported back on Aug. 1, 2012 on Calwatchdog.com, from 2008 to 2011 the State borrowed $34.16 billion from Special Funds to transfer to the General Fund.  Additionally, a portion of the overhead costs of the governor’s Strategic Growth Council — composed of high cabinet level department heads — is apparently partly funded from Proposition 84 water bonds.  The veil or curtain being used to transfer these revenues into the General Fund is the Central Service Agency Fund. 

Silence often speaks louder than words.  Did Brown actually cut his personal staff costs by half?  Thus far, the answer apparently can only be found in the silence.

6 comments

Write a comment
  1. Brown delta trout
    Brown delta trout 30 March, 2013, 20:18

    Good on ya Wayne. Now duck for cover, the commies will be on ya for foiling the plot. Not that the propaganda has not done it’s intended work already.

    Reply this comment
  2. Paul
    Paul 30 March, 2013, 22:13

    No and Brown the clown of Kommiefornia will never cut his personal staff budget by about 50 percent. These Kommie fruit cakes will just keep taxing us and letting illegal aliens in while the working citizens suffer…Plain and simple! We live in Kommieland where the leader are worthless.

    Reply this comment
  3. sean morham
    sean morham 31 March, 2013, 07:40

    Brown has the right name, same color as s%$t!!

    Reply this comment
  4. Ted Steele, Associate Prof.
    Ted Steele, Associate Prof. 31 March, 2013, 15:55

    as always– a ton of classless comments from the dull-normal crew on CWD.

    Reply this comment
  5. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 1 April, 2013, 09:15

    We were really busy for months expanding to meet the doomer’s moving needs……we even got those Fox News ergonomic butt pillows for rent for those chubby cubicle workers moving back to Frog Hollow, West Virginia.

    Reply this comment
  6. BobA
    BobA 1 April, 2013, 10:01

    Brown’s silence may speak volumes but when all is said and done, the only thing that will happen is should he be pressed to give an explanation, he will be less than forthright with his answers and it will be back to business as usual once the heat dies down if there is any. Californians have a remarkable tolerance for corrupt politicians as long as there is a “D” next to their name.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Second-largest CA school district pays teachers for not teaching

Even as Gov. Jerry Brown continues to pursue his back-to-the-past education policies — de-emphasizing testing and metrics, and pushing local

CA Dem lawmakers figuring out something rotten in CalPERS

March 19, 2013 By Chris Reed On Monday, the day that finally saw criminal charges filed over CalPERS’ brazen pay-to-play

Elected CA Dems duck issue of police treatment of minorities

As protests in Oakland, Los Angeles and San Diego have shown, there are many Californians who are upset about what