Lawmaker wants president to discharge student loan debt

May 8, 2013

By Katy Grimes

SACRAMENTO — In 2006, a major rewrite of the federal bankruptcy law allowed for federal student loans to be dischargeable. Prior to 2006, student loans, along with taxes, were always required to be paid back in bankruptcy court.

Now, Assemblyman Bob Wieckowski, D-Fremont, also a Bankruptcy lawyer, wants private student loans to also be dischargeable in bankruptcy. Assembly Joint Resolution 11 would urge the President and Congress to allow the discharge of private student loan debt in bankruptcy.

At a hearing on Tuesday in the Assembly Banking and Finance Committee, Wieckowski admitted his bill, AJR 11, was largely a political decision, but not all Democrats were in agreement.

“Why would I go for this?” asked Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-Lemon Grove. “It creates an inequity between one institution or another.”

“Most students know these loans are not dischargeable… makes them think twice before spending,” Weber added. “Students are pretty smart sometimes.”

But it became clear that one target of the resolution is private technical and vocational schools. “Technical schools are ripping people off,” said Assemblyman Bob Blumenfield, D-Los Angeles. “This may be a good thing.”

Some lawmakers have tried for several years to kill off private vocational schools, which do not hire union teachers. Granted, some of these technical and vocational schools have predatory lending practices, most are very good and serve a valuable purpose.

But the primary issue is the growing student loan debt in America. According to the bill analysis, of the 20 million who attend college each year, close to 12 million, or 60 percent, take out student loans to cover the cost. And, there are 37 million student loan borrowers with outstanding student loans today.

Committee Chairman, Assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento, added: “People who take out a loan in good faith should not be asked to carry the debt for the rest of their lives.”

But taking out a loan in good faith means you will pay the loan back. Otherwise lenders would not be lenders — they’d be philanthropists.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 8 May, 2013, 21:58

    I’m for it! Let’s discharge ALL debts….

    …..provided the PRC is on board as well.

    Something tells me I have little to worry about.

    Reply this comment
  2. Donald Mc Farland
    Donald Mc Farland 9 May, 2013, 05:35

    I think someone who is financially strapped (which most people are in the country aare,) should be able to discharge student loan debt via bankruptcy period. They want to give you an anal exam when you want to file bankruptcy but companies like GE, Facebook and other pay very little or no income taxes at all while the average Joe is forking 50% to 60% of their money to fat bloated pigs in DC. The average person in America doesn’t get a bailout from Obama. A lot of major universities give out degrees in worthlessness while at the same selling them as the be all, end all. They have just caught up to trade/vocational schools in that regard. Just watch the documentary College Conspiracy.

    Reply this comment
  3. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 9 May, 2013, 09:06

    Donny….I’ll go out a on a limb (and it’s not much of a risk) and dare say that everyone at CWD AND ITS ENTIRE READERSHIP! thinks our tax codes are due for a major overhaul.

    That said……note just about every proposal from Progs over the past several decades has severed the happy-happy joy-joy of present-day goodies from future responsibility and accountability.

    Note that Senator Fauxcahontas is proposing similar action in DC via mandated interest rate reduction, and MSNBC is falling madly in love with the idea (imagine that).

    Reply this comment
  4. John Cleveland
    John Cleveland 3 July, 2013, 10:29

    I totally agree with this, coming from someone who has gotten ripped off by a technical college. If anyone knows facts to the matter of PRIVATE loans being able to be discharge I’m all ears as currently my wife has a private loan through FMS and the agent there just informed me for every month a payment isn’t made they tack on an addition 1.7K. Does this strike anyone as outrageous?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Related Articles

Fracking watch: Saudi Arabia figures out what CA hasn’t

April 30, 2013 By Chris Reed On Monday, an Assembly committee took up three bills intended to ban or limit

A Tale of Two States, CA and NV: Part II

This is Part II in a series of stories about Nevada’s economic strategy. To read the first installment, click here.

Budget crisis upside: vindication of critiques of state Democrats

Sept. 14, 2012 By Chris Reed The budget battles of the past few years may have been aggravating, but they