Fresh evidence that Jerry Brown’s pension fix fixed little
July 10, 2013
By Chris Reed
The aura of self-congratulation surrounding the governor’s office is particularly intense when it comes to the pension reform measure that Jerry Brown got through the Legislature in September.
But I’m not like some other Cal Watchdog contributors who consider the measure a feeble joke. Its provision requiring that public employees eventually must foot half the bill for their pensions — unless it is repealed — will someday lead to public employees asking for smaller pensions so they can have more take-home pay.
That said, I too thought the governor oversold the sweep of his reform measure and was crazy to depict it as anything but the first step of several to address the pension tsunami. Now California Common Sense has come forward with a study that shows the law hasn’t changed the trajectory of California’s pension crisis at all.
“California Common Sense, a nonprofit and nonpartisan watchdog group, recently released a study pointing out that despite glowing reviews for Brown’s 2013-2014 budget — which predicts a $1.7 billion general fund surplus — the state’s unfunded retirement liability has increased 5 percent since February.
“According to the study, California’s major retirement systems now have $222.2 billion in unfunded pensions, up from $211.4 billion five months ago. The report says that number was $110 billion in 2007-2008, meaning the state’s unfunded pensions have doubled in six years.”
Officials numbers grossly understate liabilities
That’s from the Sacramento Business Journal — which also had the good sense to note the official estimates of unfunded liabilities may well be little more than happy talk.
“In January, Sacramento Bee columnist Dan Walters used figures from a Moody’s to estimate that California ‘could have unfunded pension debt approaching $300 billion, plus another $100 billion for retiree health care.’ In 2010, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s administration claimed the pension overhang for California State Teachers’ Retirement System, California Public Employees’ Retirement System and theUniversity of California Retirement System was $500 billion, a number they based on a study by a group of Stanford University students, according to the Los Angeles Times. A Stanford professor later claimed that local government retirement pensions are short by $200 billion.“
That Stanford professor was Joe Nation, a former Democratic state senator. His candor got him called names by Bill Lockyer, who for all his reputation for outspokeness and contrarianism is an abject CalPERS apologist.
Here’s a link to my whining the day that Lockyer joined Team Maviglio.
Here’s a link to the California Common Sense study.
11 comments
Write a commentWrite a Comment
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Related Articles
"That car had better be waiting"
Katy Grimes: It’s always interesting traveling and observing how people treat one another. Some are exceedingly polite while other travelers
Top lawyer for controller benefits from much-criticized state perk
The state government’s practice of letting workers defy official state policy and pile up unused vacation days and cash them
Phil Mickelson’s tax rate: 61%
What a ripoff. A guy works ceaselessly for three decades to reach the pinnacle of his profession. Then the government
The drawing of our governor looks like the drawings of visitors from outer space. Which goes with his original “handle”; Moonbeam”. Nothing much has changed from then to now I might add. .
But I’m not like some other Cal Watchdog contributors who consider the measure a feeble joke.
Teddy IS a joke 😉
And CHP just got a 6% raise.
Mommas don’t let yer babies grow up to be private sector workers. Gettem’ on the gummit gravy train.
That otta be a country western song.
The only thing that is certain is that before it is all over the taxpayers are going to get Mavigliod good and hard.
Bob, don’t get Steve going…you know he spins…errr….comments here all the time 😉
Chris as much as I like the portrait of Clown, he is now bald!!!!
And yet, CalPERS will LOWER state and school contributions by $102.8 million.
Why?
Ironically, because of :
“slower-than-expected salary and payroll growth and higher out-of-pocket contributions from employees under the pension law that took effect Jan. 1”
http://blogs.sacbee.com/the_state_worker/2013/06/calpers-approves-lower-pension-rates-for-state-schools.html
The glass is at least half full.
S Moderation,
So is that $102 Million off the $4.5 Billion INCREASE in funding they have said they need ANNUALLY for the next 30 years to pay off the unfunded liability?
$4.5 billion is STRS. They don’t have plenary authority like CalPERS does.
STRS needs $4 BILLION/yr more or it will be BK in 31 years…..
Poodle get a government job…..and save us from the naive posts…ugh!