Creating a permanent poverty class with minimum wage increases

Creating a permanent poverty class with minimum wage increases

Assembly Bill 10 to raise the minimum wage in California, is sitting on Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk. Brown has indicated he is in a signing mood, and will likely sign the bill.

unemployment, poverty, Cagle, Aug. 16, 2013

However, should AB 10 by Assemblyman Luis Alejo, D-Salina,  be signed into law, it could result in more than 68,000 jobs being lost in California over a ten-year period, and a reduction in real output of $5.7 billion, according to a recent study by the National Federation of Independent Business/California.

This is the way to create a permanent poverty class.

Despite numerous studies every year showing the damage to low-income communities with minimum wage increases, AB 10 was passed both houses of the California Legislature on a party line vote: The Senate voted 26-11 to pass AB 10, and the Assembly 52-25.

Creating a part-time workforce

As implementation of Obamacare is forcing businesses to slash the working hours of many employees below 30 hours a week, part-time workers will be hurt even more in California as Democrats push into law Assembly Bill 10. It increases the state minimum wage from $8 an hour to:

* $8.25 an hour in 2014.

* $8.75 an hour in 2015.

* $9.25 an hour in 2016.

* $9.75 an hour in 2017.

* $10 an hour in 2018.

The bill’s sponsor, the California Labor Federation, says this bill will strengthen and depoliticize California’s minimum wage. According to CLF, “Not only are those at the bottom of the wage scale mired in poverty, over recent decades the real value of their earnings has collapsed,” leaving workers worse off today.

But California’s unemployment rate just jumped to 8.9 percent, nearly double the 4.6 percent unemployment in 2006, before the Great Recession hit.

California is the fifth worst state in the country for unemployment, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. California is hardly “back,” as Gov. Jerry Brown’s media machine keeps reporting. State unemployment jumped to 8.9 percent in August, from 8.7 percent in July, when California was the sixth worst state in the nation for unemployment — well above the U.S. rate of 7.3 percent.

A minimum wage perhaps more affordable in Los Angeles, San Diego, or San Francisco, will mean mass firings in depression-stricken Imperial County, where unemployment has jumped to 26.1 percent, from 22.7 percent in May.

“The fact is, the programs labeled as being ‘for the poor,’ or ‘for the needy,’ almost always have effects exactly the opposite of those which their well-intentioned sponsors intend them to have,” American Economist Milton Friedman said. “There is absolutely no positive objective achieved by the minimum wage law. Its real purpose is to reduce competition for the trade unions and make it easier for them to maintain the higher wages of their privileged members.”

No free lunch

“There is no ‘free lunch’ when the government mandates a minimum wage,” Mark Wilson with the CATO Institute wrote last year. Wilson is a former deputy assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, and currently heads Applied Economic Strategies, LLC. “If the government requires that certain workers be paid higher wages, then businesses make adjustments to pay for the added costs, such as reducing hiring, cutting employee work hours, reducing benefits, and charging higher prices.”

“Some policymakers may believe that companies simply absorb the costs of minimum wage increases through reduced profits, but that’s rarely the case,” Wilson said. “Instead, businesses rationally respond to such mandates by cutting employment and making other decisions to maintain their net earnings. These behavioral responses usually offset the positive labor market results that policymakers are hoping for.”

Wilson said since 1995, eight studies have examined the income and poverty effects of minimum wage increases, and all but one have found that past minimum wage hikes had no effect on poverty. While some low-skilled workers living in poor families who remain employed do see their incomes rise with a minimum wage increase. However, other low-skilled workers lose their jobs or have their work hours substantially reduced, which causes income losses and increased poverty.

“On net, some studies find that the families of low-skilled workers and less-educated single mothers are no better off and may be made worse off by minimum wage hikes. The upshot is that there is no free lunch to this sort of top-down mandated attempt at reducing poverty.”

The bottom line is someone — the worker, consumer or business owner — is going to pay for this unnatural and forced cost increase.

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. Dyspeptic
    Dyspeptic 25 September, 2013, 09:43

    Are the Dumbocrats just economically ignorant or so cynical that they don’t care if unemployment increases? If they really want to impress me with their compassion Nazi routine they can raise the minimum wage to $100/hour immediately. Wouldn’t that be 10 times better than a measly $10/hour? Go big or go home you socialist idiots.

    Reply this comment
  2. Katy Grimes
    Katy Grimes Author 25 September, 2013, 10:22

    California Gov Jerry Brown signed AB 10 today, “another Texas job creation bill,” David Spady commented on Facebook. –

    Reply this comment
  3. Katy Grimes
    Katy Grimes Author 25 September, 2013, 13:02

    Assemblyman Brian Jones, R-Santee, released a press stateent about Gov. Jerry Brown signing AB 10, to increase the minimum wage from $8 to $10 per hour by 2016:

    “I am afraid the intentions of the author will backfire and this will hurt the middle class and working poor the most. It is clear California is not a business-friendly state, but this act will not just hurt businesses – it will drive up payroll costs so those businesses hire fewer people, or even worse, cut the hours of hard-working Californians trying to raise their families.”

    According to David Mitchell, who operates a number of small businesses in California, “AB 10 is another gift to the unions in California that will make our state less competitive. Ironically, it hurts the very people it is designed to help by increasing costs for all items purchased in California and incentivizes employers to replace unskilled labor with machines or otherwise reduce hours to remain in business. The timing of AB10 is particularly bad because we are trying to cope with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act which effectively raises the cost of a minimum wage employee by over $2 per hour. When fully implemented AB 10 increases the minimum wage by $2 per hour, so when coupled with the ACA, the actual cost of a minimum wage employee will have increased by at least $4 per hour or over 50% by January 2016. What business can absorb a 50% increase in their labor costs in such a short period of time without massive changes to their business model? AB 10 is a bad deal for Californians and a death knell for California business! Look for California’s already outrageously high unemployment to go up. Once again California will lead the nation in this grim statistic.”

    Reply this comment
  4. Donkey
    Donkey 27 September, 2013, 15:18

    The RAGWUS feeders are behind the ratcheting up gas prices, fees, taxes, and wages imposed by law; they believe that “higher” anything will result in more cash for the government; these people are less than stupid. 🙂

    Reply this comment
  5. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 27 September, 2013, 19:13

    If the minimum wage had been indexed to CPI inflation since 1970, it would now be at around $10.60 an hour.

    This bill isn’t too much; it’s too little.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

<



Related Articles

What I didn’t hear from Republicans this week

Jan. 26, 2013 By Katy Grimes While Gov. Jerry Brown announced a balanced budget and the magical economic recovery of

Kudos to Jeff Miller

Steven Greenhut: Maybe there’s some hope that government officials won’t always be above the law. California officials often can violate

Corporatist state takes over telecom

America really doesn’t have a free-market economy. Rather, it has a corporatist economy — that is, the union of state