Will AG Kamala Harris sign up for trial lawyers’ obesity shakedown?

Will AG Kamala Harris sign up for trial lawyers’ obesity shakedown?

legal-corruptionThe attorneys general of California and 15 other states are being implored to join in a legal crusade that holds food manufacturers responsible for obesity. Politico has the details:

Lawyers are pitching state attorneys general in 16 states with a radical idea: make the food industry pay for soaring obesity-related health care costs.

“It’s a move straight from the playbook of the Big Tobacco takedown of the 1990s, which ended in a $246 billion settlement with 46 states, a ban on cigarette marketing to young people and the Food and Drug Administration stepping in to regulate.

“There are plenty of naysayers, just as there were in 1994 when Mike Moore, Mississippi’s attorney general, famously suggested suing the tobacco industry. But a number of nutrition and legal experts think a similar strategy could be applied on the food front — especially as obesity-related diseases have surpassed smoking as a major driver of health care costs.

“’I believe that this is the most promising strategy to lighten the economic burden of obesity on states and taxpayers and to negotiate broader public health policy objectives,’ said Paul McDonald, a partner at Valorem Law Group in Chicago, who is leading the charge.

“McDonald’s firm has sent proposals to AGs from California to Mississippi explaining how suing ‘big food’ could help their states close budget gaps as billions in Medicaid expenditures eat a growing share of tax revenues.”

Sadly, many Dems will love the ‘twofer’

This is like a mini-greatest hits of everything that people who believe in liberty should hate.

ap remoraPrivate firms that make legal products facing shakedowns not just from trial lawyers but potentially from state attorney generals who are supposed to stand for justice.

What’s really appalling is that Kamala Harris just might get on the bandwagon. Democratic voters have a lot of enthusiasm for the nanny state. They want to tell other people how to live. When they can act in this vein while bullying and legally extorting evil corporations, well, that’s a twofer!

What surprises me is that the trial-lawyer remoras haven’t gone after booze or beer makers. They seem way more vulnerable to legal blackmail than food companies. Former Georgia Congressman Bob Barr wrote about the possibility a decade ago.


Write a comment
  1. DavidfromLosGatos
    DavidfromLosGatos 13 February, 2014, 17:19

    Chris –

    Maybe, just maybe, if the “conservatives” would stop their legal crusade to demonize, imprison, steal property from, and otherwise ruining US citizen’s lives for using mind and body altering drugs that may be unhealthy, the “liberals” would take a hint and allow U.S. Citizens the right to smoke, eat and drink our way to hypertension, heart disease, type II diabetes and early death.

    Personal liberty includes the right to be self-destructive.

    Reply this comment
    • Rex the Wonder Dog!
      Rex the Wonder Dog! 13 February, 2014, 21:33

      Personal liberty includes the right to be self-destructive.
      Not according to the General Welfare Clause (health safety and welfare clause) of the US Constitution.

      I still cannot believe we have to wear helmets to ride a motorcycle, even a bicycle.

      Reply this comment
  2. DavidfromLosGatos
    DavidfromLosGatos 14 February, 2014, 08:31

    Good examples, Rex. “Click-it or Ticket” seat belt laws. Darwin’s law is always there as a back-stop.

    And, yes, there are slippery slopes to be sure. For example, parents denying children life saving medical care on religious grounds.

    But, as a society, we love to tell other people what to do, to judge them, and treat them in cruel and inhumane manner based on their behavior that does not harm anyone else, e.g., a long prison sentence for possessing a drug not sold by Big Pharma and prescribed by Big Med for $$.

    And then there are still many laws in many places about what sex acts can be performed by consenting adults behind closed doors.

    Smoking, drinking, eating, helmet laws are merely subsets of what we already inflict on one another.

    Not really a Republican or Democrat distinction – they both are all for anything that keeps them in power.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Court denies asylum to German family punished by Nazi law

May 15, 2013 By John Seiler In 1938, Hitler imposed an anti-home schooling law on German families. All children were

Attack on corporations fails in Assembly

Aug. 22, 2012 By Katy Grimes It’s rare that a bad bill fails to pass one or the other houses

San Bruno pressured by state to approve housing project

The May decision of state Senate Appropriations Chairman Anthony Portantino, D-La Cañada Flintridge, to kill a sweeping bill making it