Push to restore CA bilingual education dubious in more than one way

Push to restore CA bilingual education dubious in more than one way

ron.unzWhen software tycoon Ron Unz’s Prop. 227 campaign to end bilingual education in California won landslide approval in 1998, one reason was that a lot of Latinos and white liberals shared Unz’s fundamental view that bilingual ed wasn’t working well in the nation’s largest state. L.A. Times columnist Frank del Olmo opposed 227 because he thought it went too far. But he had this to say about the status quo:

“[State policies give] many school districts a perverse incentive to keep immigrant kids in bilingual programs rather than moving them into English-language instruction.

“It should be remembered that a rapid but successful transition to English was the aim of bilingual education when it was begun in the 1970s. But like other noble experiments, it was taken over — and distorted — by education bureaucrats who care more about money and numbers than individual children.”

Claims that bilingual ed was crucial to help first-generation Latino immigrants assimilate were simply false. Here’s what Santa Barbara school board member Alan Ebenstein had to say in March 1998:

“One of the great misunderstandings regarding bilingual education is that it is a program intended mostly or even largely for students who are not born in the United States. This school year, 8.5% of Latino kindergarteners in Santa Barbara schools were not born in the United States, yet approximately 85% of Latino kindergarteners are receiving most of their instruction in Spanish. Bilingual education in California is predominantly a program to teach American children of Latino descent in Spanish for most of their elementary school years.”

Myths about bilingual ed revived

2736px-Ricardo_Lara_2012But this history has been forgotten or ignored by state Sen. Ricardo Lara, D-Bell Gardens, who has introduced a bill to have a public revote on allowing and encouraging bilingual education. Check out the whoppers Lara offers in defense of his proposal:

“’English will always remain the official language of California, but we cannot ignore the growing need to have a multilingual workforce,’ Lara said.

“He said the global economy requires those who graduate from school to be able to communicate in multiple languages. ‘Employers seek multilingual employees and all students — English and non-English learners alike — deserve access to this invaluable skill,’ Lara added.”

That’s from a short L.A. Times’ web account of Lara’s bill. Here’s hoping subsequent reporting points out that California’s history with bilingual education hardly shows it was an efficient way of producing a multilingual workforce. Instead, it produced hundreds of thousands of high school dropouts who never mastered any language.

But there’s a larger and more sweeping context here. This could be the first sign of what eventually could be a powerful movement in which Latinos seek to make California akin to Quebec, where French is treated with at least as much official deference and respect as English, the language of the rest of Canada.

California as a Spanish-language version of Quebec

quebec.signWhy might something like this happen in the Golden State? Because it’s a dramatic display of power by a group slowly but surely on its way to control of the state’s largest political party. Emerging political juggernauts like such displays. And as del Olmo wrote in 1998 …

“A small but vocal cadre of Latino activists support [bilingual education] in the misguided assumption that bilingual programs promote cultural pride in Latino kids … .”

Is it nativist to worry about this possibility? If you’re one of those people who grouse about Spanish-language signs over stores, sure. If you’re someone who is annoyed to hear Spanish spoken by fast-food workers, damn right. If you’re someone who watches “Leave It To Beaver” or “My Three Sons” and pines for the America of the 1950s, absolutely.

But if you’re someone who knows bilingual education was a giant flop last time around — something that produced students who didn’t speak either English or Spanish well — then it’s not nativist to worry about its resurrection and the motives behind it.

Latinos have enough problems with a California school system that worries more about the interests of adult employees than students. They don’t need to be subject to a risky education experiment that history shows is likely to fail.

For now, these larger questions can wait until we see where Ricardo Lara’s legislation goes. In the short term, I look forward to Sen. Lara offering any proof of his claims for what bilingual education will accomplish in California.

He won’t, because he can’t. The evidence doesn’t exist.


Write a comment
  1. Bob Smith
    Bob Smith 21 February, 2014, 11:48

    Note that in Quebec, Francophones own the government because the government requires its employees to be bilingual. Eventually CA will do the same, shutting out Anglophone US natives.

    Reply this comment
  2. Queeg
    Queeg 22 February, 2014, 09:53

    No mas!

    Won’t affect the rental yard. You can speak Farsi or Bang-the-dishee…..we cheerfully accept credit cards or dollars without prejudice.

    This article is bonafide proof incendiary articles are spooned to hapless doomers to bring out ugliness.

    Reply this comment
  3. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 22 February, 2014, 19:54

    Donkey……I am an entrepreneur and love to take potential piker/ bunker clients to lunch.

    How bout Del Taco for their burger/taco/burrito combo special prior to your move to green pastures.

    Your will be missed!

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 23 February, 2014, 08:51

      Way to destroy the English language there UU. I have no doubt that you are a PS RAGWUS feeder now!! 🙂

      Reply this comment
  4. TheSunGod
    TheSunGod 29 April, 2014, 08:11

    The reason why bilingual education would be helpful in this circumstance is the number of young children who have immigrated into the US. Without them becoming proficient in their native language, we cannot expected them to become proficient in a second language. This is simply the way that linguistics works. Previously, the majority of immigrants in the US were adults who had fluency in their native language. However, this is not the case in our current immigrant population. Also, we seem to discredit that bilingual children naturally have the potential to have a higher intelligence when they have proficiency in more than one language. While I agree that we must make sure we are providing enough English education (at least our own bastard US form of it), one of the best ways to do this with children is through both assimilation and bilingual education. While these students may be speaking proficient English currently, these same students are lacking in basic English writing skills because they lack the grammar and syntax skills of their native language.
    There needs to be a healthy dose of both. In immersion schools (we have some for Spanish, Japanese and Mandarin) primary school students are gaining proficiency in their immerse language while skills attaining their needed skills in their native language. I say native language because I have seen American, Spanish and Mandarin children within these schools.
    Many refugee programs have been able to attain this on a smaller scale. While they are providing simple English immersion to the adults, there is duel education for the children. These are generally held in the form of instructor-student teaching, where both parties are interacting in the form of code switching. Between this and direct instruction, young children are able to not only speak English but they are developing sytnax and writing skills for both languages (bilingual writing, grammar explanations).
    The problem with this is that it needs to be done right. It needs to be looked after by someone with a background in education. The unfortunate thing though is that this is not the case. In California, politicians and business people with no educational background run the system that is suppose to teach our children.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

In CA, Smarter Balanced testing shapes fate of Common Core

It’s crunch time for California supporters of the new Common Core educational standards. On several fronts, key business, education and political interests have

McCarthy poised for House Speakership

In a twist as sudden as it was unlikely, Republicans appear poised to make Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., the next Speaker of

Tax and Spend, Tax and Spend

John Seiler: Shouldn’t frugality be the order of the day? The state faces a $20 budget deficit and Gov. Jerry