Column: UC regents urged to divest in fossil fuels

Column: UC regents urged to divest in fossil fuels

 

Divest Now UCThe scene brought to mind Tom Wolfe’s essay “Mau Mauing the Flak Catchers,” which was published all the way back in 1970, when young Jerry Brown was a member of the Los Angeles Community College Board of Trustees.

Wolfe’s non-fiction essay was set at San Francisco’s Office of Economic Activity, where government functionaries – flak catchers – kowtowed to community activist types issuing one demand or another.

Fast forward to the recent meet-up of the University of California’s Board of Regents at the Sacramento Convention Center.

Outside the meeting room, a few dozen student activists from a group that calls itself Fossil Free UC noisily demanded that the regents – latter day flak catchers – divest the system’s $7.7 billion general endowment fund of fossil fuel investments.

The regents responded to being mau maued by Fossil Free UC’s student activists by expressing empathy with the group’s cause, which regent Norman Pattiz declared “valid.”

Regent Jerry Brown, now the governor of course, went so far as to say he was amendable to “some targeted disinvestment” in fossil fuels, with coal being at the top of the hit list.

Indeed, Brown and his fellow regents tasked managers of the UC endowment fund to prepare an analysis by July of the financial consequences of dumping the fund’s coal equities. Depending on the findings, the regents could act at their September board meeting in San Francisco.

‘Excited’

Fossil Free UC’s organizer, UC Berkeley student activist Ophir Bruck, said his group is “excited about” the prospect that the regents will vote to disinvest in coal. However, he added, the ultimate goal is complete disinvestment in fossil fuels. Or, as the group’s website states, “to remove the fossil fuel industry’s social license to operate.”

This is a common meme among disinvestment groups. For example, urges We Are Power Shift, a climate-change group, “Divestment is an opportunity to expose the real financial liability of investing in a company, country, or industry, and to remove the financial support that enables that them to operate according to business as usual.”

However, the global reality is that fossil fuels are as vital as ever. China and Russia just signed a $400 billion natural gas deal. And since 2010 China, not the Unites States, has been the world’s largest manufacturing economy, a position it keeps expanding. Anything done by the UC Regents might only free resources to be used by China.

Regents

It remains to be seen if the UC regents bow to Fossil Free UC’s demands. According to UC reports, the school’s general endowment has holdings in 67 of the 2,000 largest fossil-fuel reserve firms. If the endowment sold off all those holdings, it almost certainly would incur substantial losses.

As UC regents consider whether to disinvest in fossil fuels, they should consider the last time they made a politically-driven investment decision. It was in 2001, when they voted to sell all of UC’s tobacco-related holdings. As a result of the regents’ decision, UC lost a whopping $500 million in potential gains between 2001 and 2012.

UC can hardly afford to repeat that expensive mistake when it comes to fossil fuels. But if that does happen, the ultimate victims could be the students, who might face higher tuition or, for poor students, a reduction in scholarships.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Tony Favero
    Tony Favero 30 May, 2014, 14:08

    Perhaps the UC Regents should divest from fossil fuels immediately and invest in the green energy companies of this current administration? Lets see if we can heat our homes and have hot showers and cars that can go past 70 miles without a 7 hour charge time….or if even we can have adequate electricity for anything….with more solar and windmills.
    You can build windmills with steel but you can’t make steel with windmills….so yes, lets divest from solar so that we all can go to Wal Mart and buy big screens made in Asia…..where more inefficient coal power plants will be necessary to fill Wal Mart with essentials we can no longer or are unable to produce on our own. Truly liberalism is a wide spread mental disorder devoid of any rationality.

    Reply this comment
  2. Gonzo
    Gonzo 2 June, 2014, 09:55

    Ditto what Tony said! Our Exxon stock has been a phenomenal performer over the years! Please UC divest so we can buy possibly buy/reinvest in some cheaper shares! Maybe by the time my kids go off to college we can sell off some of our Exxon shares and be able afford not to settle for a UC school.

    Reply this comment
  3. JoeS
    JoeS 2 June, 2014, 16:09

    Taxpayers are stuck with every idiot idea liberals come up with. We pay for the UC system, Teachers Retirement, Public Employee Retirement, etc by investing in PROFITABLE businesses. Gasoline and Guns are the two most profitable… so liberals divest…

    Reply this comment
  4. Bud Led Ted S.
    Bud Led Ted S. 3 June, 2014, 20:14

    The UC Regents should do whatever our big oil masters tell us to do.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Related Articles

California Air Resources Board ratchets up emissions regulations

  Continuing a years-long push, the California Air Resources Board cracked down further on emissions, sharpening the debate over the

Bets placed on dueling online poker bills

This year could bring gambling to Internet users in California. For years, online poker has been legal in the United

Jessica's Law flaws debated

Feb. 17, 2010 By ELISE VIEBECK Officials at a Senate hearing yesterday questioned the effectiveness of Jessica’s Law, the 2006