Vergara ruling: Silicon Valley titan KOs teachers unions

In 16 pages, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Rolf M. Treu dealt California’s teachers unions an unprecedented defeat. Using unsparing, uncompromising language, Judge Treu ruled that job protections passed at these unions’ behest violated the state Constitution by denying equal educational opportunity to students including the plaintiffs in the case, Vergara vs. California.
In one sense, the astonishing result is a reminder of how powerful the legal doctrine of equal protection has become. Treu did not agree as a matter of law that “every child, everywhere, deserves great teachers.” But he did conclude that union job protections for teachers, including bad teachers, had fostered inequalities of opportunity so grave as to shock the conscience.
Explicitly drawing a comparison between Vergara and Brown vs. Board of Education, Treu ensured that similar litigation will spring up around America. It is a surprising reversal of roles for political partisans, many of whom associate bold, consequential readings of equal protection clauses with traditionally liberal causes, plaintiffs, and judges. (Indeed, lead counsel in the plaintiff’s case was Theodore Boutrous Jr., who successfully litigated the challenge to Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in California.)
Silicon Valley muscle
But in another sense, the Vergara case reveals how the power of Silicon Valley now reaches far beyond technology, politics or even the economy as a whole. The priorities and perspectives of some of Silicon Valley’s most socially involved figures now shape the most basic legal concepts undergirding American life.
David Welch, a longtime fiber-optic communications entrepreneur, founded and chairs the board of Students Matter, the group responsible for organizing and pursuing the Vergara case. A board member of the National Resources Defense Council, he does not fit the stereotype of the movement conservatives often presumed to spearhead legal action against teachers unions. Yet at the same time, neither does Welch’s profile match the prevailing view of Silicon Valley’s youthful, web-centric titans. Rather than pursuing public policy outcomes in realms like surveillance or gay marriage, Welch sought structural change in K-12 education — without relying on the internet, like Mountain View heavyweight Khan Academy.
Welch’s efforts underscore how Silicon Valley can no longer be presented as “disrupting” settled institutional practices in a one-dimensional way. Although the buzzword of disruption has come in for its share of scorn, critics will feel pressured by events to acknowledge that the change wrought by Welch scrambles typical partisan battle lines, rather than reinforcing Randians-versus-the-masses cliches.
Divided Democrats
Democrats, for instance, are now as deeply divided on education reform as they have been since the civil rights era. In California, the differences are striking. Tom Torlakson, the incumbent superintendent of public instruction, benefited from $2.5 million in independent expenditures by the California Teachers Association this primary election. LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy, by contrast, penned an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times touting his “responsibility and privilege” to make good on Judge Treu’s ruling.
Democrats nationwide who remain loyal to teachers unions will likely face an opportunity to change their political calculus. Education reformers are looking to pattern lawsuits off of the Vergara case in Connecticut, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and elsewhere, according to Politico — along with a “relentless public relations campaign, backed by millions of dollars from reform-minded philanthropists, to bring moms, dads and voters of both parties to their side.”
In that fashion, it’s clear that even Silicon Valley’s most powerful figures can’t single-handedly change America’s legal landscape. Although Welch has proven instrumental in achieving an early victory essential for a broader national attack on teacher unions’ tenure regimes, that kind of reform movement requires more than money or influential figureheads. Like most large-scale political efforts, without an energized, broad base of ordinary Americans, it will fizzle out and fail.
9 comments
Write a commentWrite a Comment
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Related Articles
GOP can’t find bridge for troubled water bill
The fate of a bipartisan drought bill passed Tuesday by the U.S. House of Representatives is as cloudy as California skies in
State may seek parenting role with youngest kids
March 21, 2013 By Katy Grimes SACRAMENTO — In his February State of the Union speech, President Barack Obama asserted
Last CA nuke plant to close
California regulators have made preparations to close Diablo Canyon, the state’s last remaining nuclear power plant, in a move quickly
This case will have a VERY short shelf life———Zzzzz
Enjoy while u have it doomers!!
That’s why we have appellate courts.
Yoooohoooo. Judge Treu was appointed in West Covina, my hometown, by Wilson. I agree that some socialist dem judge will defecate on the students by siding with the teachers and over turn this great ruling.
As for doomers, it is the occupy enviornmentalists who are saying that this global warming is about to set the earth on fire. This is after the coldest winter in recorded history in North America.
But I agree with Bud. The 9th circuit will dump on this as they dump on the children too.
Hondo……….
Anyone who believes two years is adequate experience for tenure is either too ignorant, or does not care about educating the next generation.
Sean— Not only does the crew out here NOT know–
They do NOT care! It’s a tea baggy reactive dull normal crowd here.
This is a 9 on the Richter scale, shaking the ivory towers of kalifornia uniondom to their foundations.
Of course 2 years to tenure is ABSURD.
If it is upheld, that will be the ‘coup de grace’ to all public employee union entitlements, think of a towering tsunami smashing into said ivory towers.
Look for panicking public employee unions to run to their sock puppets in the legislature even before the appeals begin,seeking some kind of ironclad/bulletproof legislative ‘relief’. After all, these people are utterly focused on job security, if not their ‘jobs’.
alot of hyperbole no Billo?
It is all about the kids, not! $+!k them.
LOL
The LA County Superior Court!
The highest court in the land….LMAO
Case reversed in 3, 2, 1…….