Torlakson continues lying about teacher-discipline law AB 215

Torlakson continues lying about teacher-discipline law AB 215

lie-def

ab.215

Tom Torlakson supports a status quo in which an average of 2.2 of the state’s 275,000 public school teachers are fired each year for incompetence — a figure so ridiculous you barely need to add context. It shows the public school system is run for the adult employees, not the students.

Yet as he seeks a second term as state superintendent of public instruction against reformer Marshall Tuck, Torlakson continues to pretend he doesn’t like horrible teachers in the classroom and did something about it.

As he has done throughout his campaign, Tuck condemned Torlakson’s appeal of a Superior Court judge’s ruling in Vergara v. the State of California, overturning laws creating tenure in two years, governing dismissals and requiring layoffs by seniority. Those laws, he said, “have led us to a situation where we can’t have an effective teacher in the classroom” and are “crushing the hopes” of the state’s most challenged students. …

Torlakson agreed that when “teachers are not up to it, move them out” and said that he wrote and helped pass a law this year making it easier to fire “ineffective and abusive teachers.” The bill, AB 215, by Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan, D-Alamo, dealt primarily with teachers charged with abuse, not poor performance.

That’s from John Fensterwald’s coverage of the final forum between the two Democrats running for superintendent. I’m glad he mentioned Torlakson’s, er, disingenuousness, but he was on the kind side. AB 215 has nothing — nothing — to do with getting rid of incompetent teachers. Fensterwald’s use of “primarily” to describe what the bill is focused on gives Torlakson a bit of cover he just doesn’t deserve.

I will once again cite the first three sentences of AB 215, the teacher discipline law Torlakson invokes:

Existing law prohibits a permanent school employee from being dismissed, except for one or more of certain enumerated causes, including immoral or unprofessional conduct. This bill would also include egregious misconduct, as defined, as a basis for dismissal. Existing law requires the governing board of a school district to give notice to a permanent employee of its intention to dismiss or suspend the employee, together with a written statement of charges, at the expiration of 30 days from the date of service of the notice, unless the employee demands a hearing. This bill would additionally apply the above to egregious misconduct.

The bill is about “egregious misconduct” — not incompetence.

You know what’s “egregious misconduct”? Torlakson’s utter dishonesty.

I await the education reporters of the state clearly calling him out on this. It’s ridiculous.

If they don’t, you know what? That’s “egregious misconduct” as well.

The L.A. Times has endorsed Tuck as have all major California newspapers. This isn’t something that’s being ignored by newsrooms in California for ideological reasons. It has more to do with basic competence.

3 comments

Write a comment
  1. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 1 October, 2014, 08:57

    Public sector employee unions RULE because the taxpaying electorate has completely checked out. From teachers who cannot be fired to cops who are completely unaccountable, firefighters making 250-500 k per year plus outrageous benefits, this trend will probably continue until it collapses. This is because voters refuse to vote, refuse to get involved with local government and over time the unions have cleverly erected higher barriers to change and meaningful public participation. I refer everyone to Mike Aguirre’s white papers on San Diego’s pension crisis. Brilliant and insightful.

    Reply this comment
  2. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 1 October, 2014, 09:12

    It depends what is the definition of “is” or “what difference does it make” or “lets just move on forward”.

    Most residents have no idea what “egregious” means. Only attorneys know-

    Reply this comment
  3. LetitCollapse
    LetitCollapse 1 October, 2014, 21:44

    Hey, if the general public can’t get fired up enough to force this sick system that protects rotten teachers to change after we learned it took the wrath of God to fire some perverted, twisted teacher who fed his students cookies laced with his own ejaculate, this society is so morally decayed and bent that I see little cause for hope. Let it collapse.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Democrats leave incumbent assemblywoman high and dry

Parties and legislative leaders always protect their incumbents. Well, maybe not always, as is the case with Assemblywoman Patty Lopez, a

KFI’s John & Ken discuss ‘Browndoggle’ with CWD’s Chris Reed

March 16. 2013 In an interview with CalWatchdog contributor Chris Reed, KFI 640 AM’s John and Ken discussed the fiasco

Will young CA justices use Vergara case to audition for SCOTUS?

The Volokh Conspiracy, the wonderful legal blog founded by UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, had a provocative post about what