One year later, glitches still plague Covered CA

One year later, glitches still plague Covered CA

 

Covered California front page, Oct. 3, 2013“Here we go again with the same nightmare as a year ago. [I’m] truly fed up with Covered California’s technical incompetency.” So complained Igal Koiman, a health insurance broker, in remarks published this week in the Sacramento Business Journal.

His frustrations echo those of many other brokers throughout the state who fear the Covered California website will be no less glitch-ridden on Nov. 15, when open enrollment begins this year, than it was 19 months ago, when the state’s online Obamacare health exchange stumbled out of the starting gate.

Koiman related that, for the past two weeks, he has been unable to update plans for his established clients. When he contacted Covered California for help, he received an email reply informing him, “We do not currently have an ETA as to when this enrollment error will be corrected.”

These are the kind of system failures that have persistently plagued CoveredCA.com since its rollout. Indeed, the website has crashed numerous times, not just for hours, but for several days.

The Covered California website was developed by the consulting firm Accenture, which in 2012 received a $359 million state contract to not only build the site, but to operate it during its first three-and-a-half years. Meanwhile, Accenture brought on CGI Federal as a subcontractor for CoveredCA.com.

Both firms have recent troubling track records.

Accenture in 2011 paid $63.6 million to settle a U.S. Justice Department lawsuit charging the firm received kickbacks for its recommendations of specific hardware and software to the federal government, fraudulently inflated prices and rigged bids on federal IT contracts.

Tony West, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Division, said of the lawsuit:

“Kickbacks and bid rigging undermine the integrity of the federal procurement process. At a time when we’re looking for ways to reduce our public spending, it is especially important to ensure that government contractors play by the rules and don’t waste precious taxpayer dollars.”

And Christopher R. Thyer, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, said:

“We strive each and every day to bring justice to the citizens of the Eastern District of Arkansas. … Fraudulent business practices that steal hard earned and much needed tax dollars from appropriate use will not be tolerated. The United States Attorney’s Office is committed to pursuing these cases to the full extent of the law.”

Subsidiary

CGI Federal is a subsidiary of the Montreal-based CGI Group, which in 2012 was fired by the provincial government in Ontario after the IT firm failed to fulfill its contract to build an online medical registry for the province’s diabetes patients.

According to the Washington Examiner:

“In Canada, eHealth, the Ontario provincial agency, scrapped its high-profile online medical registry for diabetes sufferers and treatment providers, and canceled CGI Group’s $46.2 million contract, on Sept. 5, 2012. The company was 14 months behind schedule when it was given notice of termination by the Ontario government agency.

“In the meantime, a group of other Ontario IT companies successfully replicated the registry, rendering CGI’s project obsolete.

“Because the contract terms stipulated payment only upon delivery of a satisfactory final product, the province has refused to pay CGI.

“CGI has not publicly discussed the eHealth failure, but has taken legal action, including filing a defamation suit against eHealth and the Toronto Star newspaper.

“CGI has received bipartisan condemnation from Ontario government officials for its failure on the registry.

“’They did not meet the requirements of their contract which was faced with many layers of delays, which caused great angst among the health care providers who are trying to do their best,’ Frances Gélinas, a member of Ontario’s provincial parliament, told the Washington Examiner.

“’They basically said, “This is not working.” CGI is not delivering what we need,’ Gélinas said. Gélinas also serves as a health policy spokeswoman for the NDP, an opposition Canadian political party.”

Tterminated

In January, CGI’s U.S. contract to build and maintain HealthCare.gov, the federal Obamacare website, was terminated in the wake of the site’s disastrous rollout. The firm the Obama administration chose to pick up where CGI Federal left off was none other than Accenture.

The partnership of Accenture and CGI Federal on the Covered California website does not inspire confidence that the online portal will be good to go a mere two weeks from now.

The more likely scenario is that the persistent glitches that afflicted CoveredCA.com during its first year of operation, that caused repeated shutdowns of the state-run Obamacare exchange, will continue apace in year two.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. LetitCollapse
    LetitCollapse 3 November, 2014, 21:24

    I suggest that everyone reduce their incomes to the Medi-Cal threshold and jump aboard the free health care train! You can still live in a $2 million dollar mansion and own another $million$ in stocks and bonds. They only evaluate your INCOME – not your assets. Medi-Cal offers great health care, regardless of what you’ve been told. Good choice of docs. Quick hassle free specialist referrals. ER treatment covered regardless of whether it’s an emergency or not! All the medical tests that your little heart desires. Got back pain? Free massages! Do you weigh 350 pounds and have chest pains? No problem. Just order a quadruple bypass. No premium. No deductible. No copay. What’s not to love about that! ObolaCare specialists are only a phone call away! Call and tell them that you want the free ObolaCare special! If enough people sign up it will crash the system and it will force the gov to design a legitimate health care system like we had back in the 1960’s. Today the middle class producers get screwed because they have to subsidize all the parasites! Watch your premiums continue to get racheted upwards by 12% to 20% each year!!! Folks, you can’t beat ’em. We know that now. So for God sakes – JOIN ‘EM!!! Get yours before the entire system crashes!!! 🙂

    Reply this comment
  2. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 3 November, 2014, 22:58

    The rune scribe boring us relentlessly……pity.

    Reply this comment
  3. Dork
    Dork 4 November, 2014, 09:47

    Medi-Cal threshold and jump aboard the free health care train! You can still live in a $2 million dollar mansion and own another $million$ in stocks and bonds. They only evaluate your INCOME – not your assets

    Be careful, if you are between 55-64, the STATE will go after your Estate for ALL COSTS they paid after you die. They will make your surviving spouse homeless and take everything you OWNED.

    Reply this comment
    • LetitCollapse
      LetitCollapse 4 November, 2014, 11:55

      “Be careful, if you are between 55-64, the STATE will go after your Estate for ALL COSTS they paid after you die. They will make your surviving spouse homeless and take everything you OWNED.”

      Not entirely correct.

      (1) Those seniors who are over 65 with BOTH Medi-Care and Medi-Cal (yes, some do!) are still subject to asset recovery on their Medi-Cal benefits used. So those who are over age 55 to infinity are subject to asset recovery with Medi-Cal.
      (2) Although the State has the authority to seize your assets, it doesn’t mean that it will. But you are certainly rolling the dice by joining Medi-Cal after age 55.
      (3) The surviving spouse is exempted from asset recovery until he or she dies. So it’s not the surviving spouse that gets screwed. It’s their kids or heirs to the estate.

      I believe this asset recovery law will get tested in the court system since it is blatant age discrimination. Why should someone over 55 be subject to Medi-Cal asset recovery after they die when they are FORCED into Medi-Cal by virtue of their income under ObolaCare while those UNDER 55 are not subject to the same asset recovery for Medi-Cal benefits used??? Totally unfair and blatant discrimination. The legislators passed a law that would have remedied this discrimination, but Jerry Clown vetoed it, thereby screwing all FORCED Medi-Cal recipients over 55. So thank Mr. Clown for this unfairness.

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

If it moves, the state wants to license it

July 20, 2012 By Joseph Perkins I’m not a pet guy. I have no personal stake in legislation, sponsored by

Tribes at odds over online poker

Feb. 11, 2010 By ELISE VIEBECK In an eight-hour session on Tuesday, a Senate committee considered the implications of legalizing

OC Unions Right, Businesses Wrong

Steven Greenhut: It’s not every day that I side with the public employee unions. In fact, it’s almost never the