Oakland arts tax slams poor

Oakland arts tax slams poor

Oakland skyline, wikimediaWith Californians increasingly being priced out of owning homes, what does progressive Oakland do? Make housing even more expensive. Reported the Chronicle:

“The City Council passed a law this month that requires private developers to set aside 1 percent of their project costs for public art. With dozens of developments in the works, the law could make Oakland one of the most arts-centric cities in the state, advocates said.”

According to Zillow.com, Oakland’s median house price is about $500,000. New developments would charge somewhat more than that.

So the new tax effectively increases the costs of these new houses by at least $5,000. And costs there ripple throughout the city. For that much, you could put a poor person in a small apartment for a year.

As to being “arts-centric,” why can’t artists fund their own works? And if not, then why doesn’t Oakland fund writers? We could use some tax subsidies, too. We could write poems to Oakland, such as:

Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
I had Oakland’s taxes,
How about you?


Tags assigned to this article:
John SeilerOaklandTaxes

Related Articles

Good ol' Tom

And now for another installment in our irregular look at Republicans who feed at the public employee union trough. According

California: worst for small business

It’s common knowledge that small businesses create most new jobs. Now this bad news for California: “California has landed on

Los Angeles County the capital of U.S. poverty

The Census Bureau’s 2012 decision to begin releasing an alternative measure of poverty that included cost of living has appeared