Brown talks taxes at budget press conference

Brown talks taxes at budget press conference

 

Brown’s budget video addressReading Gov. Jerry Brown’s meaning on some issues, with or without a dictionary and history text, can be tricky. But it was worth looking for signals on tax issues at the governor’s Friday press conference introducing his record, $113 billion general-fund budget for fiscal year 2015-16, which begins on July 1.

When Brown was asked about extending the $7 billion yearly Proposition 30 tax increases or making them permanent, he noticeably paused before answering, “I said that’s a temporary tax and that’s my position.”

It may be risky to see meaning in the pause, but it suggested he was responding carefully. That prompts some parsing of the short answer. If the Prop. 30 taxes were extended a specific length of time, in the governor’s mind would it still be considered a “temporary” tax with a new end date as opposed to making the tax permanent?

Therefore, cloaked in the governor’s answer, is there now some wiggle room for discussing a tax extension?

Or is that just imaginary monsters hiding in the shadows?

When asked about tax reform, Brown framed the answer in a skeptical tone, when responding to a reporter, as lowering the tax on the rich and adding it to the middle class and the poor.

He then noted the debate that will be generated by the effort of state Sen. Bob Hertzberg, D-Van Nuys, to reform taxes, including taxing services. Brown highlighted the difficult hurdles to convince people to accept service taxes.

“I think Mr. Hertzberg is going to come up with some great ideas and people ought to listen to him and see where they go,” Brown said. “But I can tell you this, taxing new people is always difficult. So if you tell them that their Pilates class takes a 8.5 percent sales tax, they may not be as yoga happy as they were before.”

Infrastructure

In searching for revenues for transportation infrastructure, one highlighted in his Jan. 5 Inaugural Address, Brown seemed open to the idea of road-usage charges for miles driven. He referenced a four-year study on the gas tax and funding for infrastructure that he intended to accelerate.

He plans to meet with leaders of both parties to see what resources are available for transportation. “Revenue enhancements,” perhaps — the 1980s term for tax increases?

Clearly, the tax question will not go away, even with the governor’s pronouncement of a “precariously” balanced budget.  He said California already has a pretty generous tax structure and robust public-sector investment. The promised “investments” will only go up and can be challenging down the road.

The promise of more spending is built into current programs and the pressure from advocates for additional spending, particularly on social service programs, is continuing. So the tax question will hover over this legislative session and in all likelihood will come before voters via the initiative route in the next election cycle.

If that happens, it will be interesting to see where the governor stands.

3 comments

Write a comment
  1. Queeg
    Queeg 12 January, 2015, 11:23

    Geesh.

    Your minders need your help!

    Reply this comment
  2. bob
    bob 12 January, 2015, 14:18

    Yup, Brownie is being a typical politician. Extend the tax increases for 20 more years and you can still call them temporary.

    No matter how high taxes are they are never high enough for DemoNcrats.

    Reply this comment
  3. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 13 January, 2015, 08:28

    That ’80’s alt-rock tune comes to mind: ‘the grasping hands grab all they can, everything helps in large amounts’.

    When it comes to infrastructure in California, especially roads, I can speak from experience in that ‘stakeholders’ will ALWAYS budget in their own compensation before asphalt, graders, equipment, signage, etc. As the budget gets squeezed up by PLA’s, administrative overhead, engineering studies and government compliance for an alphabet soup of agencies demanding their mordita, including NEPA and CEQA requirements, there is correspondingly less for the actual stuff of roadbuilding (culverts, gravel, fill, compacters).

    Then come the ‘advocates’, forever identifying ‘needs’…

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Tags assigned to this article:
Bob HertzbergCalifornia budgetJerry BrownTaxes

Related Articles

Covered CA signups fall short of goal

Amid a shifting, uncertain health care landscape, Covered California’s latest round of enrollments fell short of administrators’ goals. In a

Assembly Carves Up Organic Farming

JULY 19, 2011 By KATY GRIMES California is still growing government, but in an unlikely place. The Assembly now has

SCOTUS sides with SF against NRA

Continuing its reticence to reach beyond a landmark decision seven years ago, the Supreme Court handed a victory to tight regulations