UC budget fight: Brown playing 3D chess, Napolitano playing tic-tac-toe

UC budget fight: Brown playing 3D chess, Napolitano playing tic-tac-toe

Janet_NapolitanoGov. Jerry Brown has upped the stakes in his fight with University of California President Janet Napolitano over who is ultimately in charge of UC budget and tuition decisions.

Napolitano’s success last fall in getting UC regents to approve a five-year, 28 percent tuition hike conditioned on how much state funding UC receives is what triggered the fight.

In his newly released state budget, the governor not only ignored her call for more funding, he indicated a preparedness to micromanage UC over whom it admits. The Los Angeles Times’ George Skelton depicted Brown as having …

… essentially stiffed UC President Janet Napolitano and the regents, who have threatened to raise tuition again unless the state chips in substantially more money.

Brown re-offered only last year’s deal: a 4% increase, or about $120 million, if the university keeps tuition flat. UC previously said that wasn’t enough. “The $120 million is not chump change,” the governor insisted.

And he threw in a new condition: No additional out-of-state students, who pay triple tuition, crowding out California kids. UC was “created by the people of California … for the citizens of the state,” he declared.

The populist quality of his admissions maneuver will serve Brown well politically — even if it goes against his normal posture of budget pragmatism. Out-of-state students pay so much in tuition that they shore up financing for UC and relieve pressure on the state budget.

Brown, Legislature > Napolitano, regents

But the insiders and UC watchers I have spoken with think the governor is playing three-dimensional chess and Napolitano is playing tic-tac-toe.

Brown and the Legislature want to get credit for tuition relief for the middle class. Napolitano wants to have a bigger budget but has yet to convince the public or the media that UC is in dire straits.

The governor just won a landslide re-election by making the case he is a careful fiscal steward of the state. Napolitano has no political base in California after years as governor and attorney general of Arizona and homeland security czar for the Obama administration.

Given these facts and circumstances, it’s difficult to see how Brown can lose this fight. The more interesting question is whether Brown will allow the UC president to save face by making some concessions. To this point, he’s not just content to accept the narrative of her as an adversary, he’s actively encouraging it.

Skelton thinks this may be the end game:

Brown wants to negotiate with Napolitano over university cost-cutting, which could include professors spending more time teaching and less researching.

But that would only be a further humiliation for Napolitano, who has repeatedly declared her intention to keep the UC system as one of the world’s great centers of research.

If Napolitano went along, it would also likely trigger a sharp reaction from the UC Faculty Senate.

The former Arizona gov may already regret challenging the current California gov so directly.

5 comments

Write a comment
  1. Bruce
    Bruce 18 January, 2015, 11:40

    And if Napolitano gets her way the money goes to fat pensions.

    Reply this comment
  2. bob
    bob 18 January, 2015, 14:08

    Old Brownie better watch out. Big Sis will push him through one of those TSA porno scanners or maybe give him a good TSA feel up.

    Don’t you just love to see DemoNcrats ripping each other apart?

    As Bill Kilgore would say, “I love the smell of freshly burnt DemoNcrat in the morning.”

    Reply this comment
  3. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 18 January, 2015, 22:17

    “Napolitano has no political base in California after years as governor and attorney general of Arizona and homeland security czar for the Obama administration.” Bingo. So, again, exactly how the hell did Sistah Sledge get this job? Obviously at the national level it was payback for ‘a job well done’, but how did the national level powerz line up the needed votes in the UC regents, or whomever was needed in California to sign off on her appointment? And how was this done without Brown on board? It seemed as though she had no sooner announced her resignation from HSD than INVISIBLE HANDS anointed her head of the UC system.

    Reply this comment
  4. bob
    bob 19 January, 2015, 09:13

    Bingo. So, again, exactly how the hell did Sistah Sledge get this job?

    Yeah, what’s [email protected] know about education? What qualifies her to lead UC? She’s a career politician.

    This is just another example of fellow politicians rewarding their crony friends. But I guess the DemoNcrat apologists who infest this blog will tell us Big Sis knows everything and therefore can do anything. Watch out, Jerry!

    Reply this comment
  5. Bill Gore
    Bill Gore 20 January, 2015, 07:45

    The UC system is supposed to be a spoils/patronage trinket for Californians! Not for tazer-worshipping national police state kreeps from DC and Arizona!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

It’s hard to see how Jerry loses

Chapman University’s usually accurate Economic Forecast expects growth of about 2.2 percent over the next year for the country, somewhat

Gov. Brown signs bill allowing nurses to perform abortions

A bill allowing nurse practitioners to perform abortions was signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown this week. AB 154

State game wardens oppose lead ammo ban

There are more than a dozen gun-control bills sitting on Gov. Jerry Brown's desk, awaiting his signature or veto. Brown