Lawmakers dismiss efforts to protect property rights from high-speed rail

High Speed Rail JapanState lawmakers are forcing property owners “all aboard” the state’s high-speed rail project – whether they like it or not.

This month, two state legislative panels blocked efforts by Central Valley Republican lawmakers to guarantee the property rights of those caught in the path of the the $68 billion transportation project. State Senator Andy Vidak of Hanford and Asm. Jim Patterson of Fresno are concerned that the California High Speed Rail Authority could use eminent domain to seize land for a project that may never be built.

“I’ve heard from dozens and dozens of property owners – many are farmers, small businesses and homeowners – that they are victims of these flash appraisals and pressure tactics,” said Sen. Vidak, who has been one of the state’s leading high-speed rail critics. “Many of these folks have land, businesses and homes that have been in the same family for several generations.”

Eminent domain requires fair-market compensation

For centuries, governments have used the power of eminent domain to compel property owners to sell their property for large public works projects. In theory, the Fifth Amendment guarantees the rights of property owners to receive just compensation for any property that is seized for public use.

“The U.S. Supreme Court has defined fair market value as the most probable price that a willing but unpressured buyer, fully knowledgeable of both the property’s good and bad attributes, would pay,” Cornell University Law School explains in its Fifth Amendment primer.

andy-vidakHowever, in practice, government agencies with their unlimited resources and army of lawyers can tip the scales in favor of a lower price.

Lawmakers say “no” to independent audit

In the Central Valley, residents are concerned that the state’s high-speed rail agency, which has already blown its budget estimates, could use “flash appraisals” and other hardball tactics to take property for less than the fair market value.

To make sure that everything’s on the up-and-up, Vidak requested that the state’s independent auditor investigate the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s property acquisition process. Among the questions Vidak wanted answered:

  • Has the Authority’s contractors issued any property acquisition offers that the property or business owners were not involved in for the appraisal of their property or business?
  • What policies and procedures has the Authority given to its contractors in order to obtain property necessary for the completion of the High-Speed Rail project?

After hearing testimony from the High-Speed Rail Authority, the Joint Legislative Audit Committee rejected Vidak’s audit request on a party-line vote.

“There seems to be a misperception that the High-Speed Rail Authority has unique authorities or abilities with regard to right of way that are separate from other state agencies,” California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Jeff Morales told state lawmakers. “That’s just not the case.”

A flabbergasted Vidak expressed his dismay at his colleagues.

“I won’t say the result of the hearing was a ‘whitewash’ or ‘cover-up’ for the Authority, but clearly this reasonable request should have been given high priority, not rejected,” he said following the vote.

Assembly Committee rejects Patterson’s property rights proposal

bullet.trainIn the lower house, Asm. Jim Patterson, a fellow Central Valley Republican lawmaker, didn’t fare any better with his proposal to place restrictions on when the rail authority can seize property.

Assembly Bill 1138, the Protection from Eminent Domain Act, would prohibit the rail authority from beginning the eminent domain process until all the necessary funding and environmental approvals for the project have been secured.

Central Valley property owners that have held land for multiple generations supported the measure as a way to guarantee that their historic land rights remain intact – if the project is unsuccessful. According to the Sacramento Business Journal, the state has acquired just 209 of the 1,100 parcels needed for the first construction segment from Madera to Bakersfield – with 54 eminent domain lawsuits pending against the state.

“The reality is — this project does not have the funds in line necessary, and it is a grave injustice to the people whose property is being taken,” Patterson said at a press conference earlier this month. “We join with our Central Valley neighbors who are concerned that their property will be taken by the state for a project that doesn’t have a clear funding source and could be abandoned altogether, leaving these hardworking families with nothing.”

Yet, the Assembly Transportation Committee ignored those concerns and defeated Assembly Bill 1138 on a party-line 5-10 vote, with all Republicans in favor.

With ongoing questions about ridership estimates and travel times, the project’s viability remains very much in doubt.’s Chris Reed has pointed out that the chorus of high-speed rail critics is growing – with even liberal journalists questioning the project.

“We are rapidly exiting the realm of rose-colored glasses and entering the realm of pure fantasy here,” Kevin Drum, a writer for Mother Jones magazine, wrote last year. “If liberals keep pushing this project forward in the face of plain evidence that its official justifications are brazenly preposterous, conservatives are going to be able to pound us year after year for wasting taxpayer money while we retreat to ever more ridiculous and self-serving defenses that make us laughingstocks in the public eye.”


Write a comment
  1. Dawn Urbanek
    Dawn Urbanek 28 April, 2015, 08:32

    The State Constitution mandattes that the State pay for 2 things ONLY
    1) A Free K-12 Public Education System and
    2) A State Militia

    California’s new education funding law intentionally underfunds wealthy suburban school districts and keeps that money at the State to fund other projects such as High Speed Rail.

    If the law were to be challenged in Federal Court as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment the State would be forced to stop all spending on EVERYTHING else until every student in California received adequate funding for a basic education. There would be an injunction preventing any further spending on High Speed rail until that constitutional obligation was met.

    Delay would be helpful, and such a suit would bring attention to how terribly this state treats every student who happens to live in a wealthy area.

    See: Basis for a law suit in Federal Court Challenging the Constitutionality of California’s New Education Funding Formula.

    Reply this comment
  2. Dawn Urbanek
    Dawn Urbanek 28 April, 2015, 08:36

    It should be noted that the State withholds $200 million per year from the Capistrano Unified School District alone. So while our students attend classes in overcrowded classrooms, in buildings that have not been maintained with continued cuts to programs and student services, our State legislature uses money that should go to the education of taxpayer students- goes to High Speed rail and entitlements for people who are not legally entitled to be in this Country. Why should taxpayers allow an abusive government to steel their land and deprive their kids of an adequate education. It is time to take a stand.

    Reply this comment
    • Dyspeptic
      Dyspeptic 28 April, 2015, 12:07

      “Why should taxpayers allow an abusive government to steel their land and deprive their kids of an adequate education. It is time to take a stand.”

      It’s too late to take a stand. The critical mass of DemocRat hegemony has already been reached. The somnolent masses of idiot Commiefornia voters are more interested in pro basketball, celebrity gossip and slurping down overpriced, over roasted, organic, fair trade, free range coffee.

      With priorities like that it’s no wonder the authoritarian Corruptocrats run amok with impunity while the complacent and gullible electorate obsesses over cable TV freak shows and the latest iPhone gadget.

      Alas, we get the government we deserve, and we get it good and hard.

      Reply this comment
      • Dawn Urbanek
        Dawn Urbanek 28 April, 2015, 12:54

        It is not to late if we enforce the Constitution both of the State of California and the United States.

        Reply this comment
  3. John Galt
    John Galt 28 April, 2015, 09:00

    How’s that state petition effort going to make four or six new states out of California? Sounds better each day, doesn’t it?

    Reply this comment
  4. Dyspeptic
    Dyspeptic 28 April, 2015, 12:11

    Don’t worry little people. Your life, liberty and property are up for grabs, but the overlords have no such worries. And they sleep very well knowing that the system works for them and them alone.

    Reply this comment
  5. mteresa
    mteresa 28 April, 2015, 15:39

    Just a reminder, I am dead and am in heaven. Great beaches, golf.
    I talked with St. Peter about Jerry Brown. Pete said there is a guy in hell who keeps wearing out roommates. They just can t handle his size.
    Jerry, meet Idi Amin. Some just call him, The Bullet Train.

    Reply this comment
  6. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 27 September, 2015, 22:41

    So interested in thsier high speed rail they ignore private property just like the Fish & Wildlife Service dose our Imperial Lawmakers

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Morro Bay Power Plant shutdown saves fish, kills birds

Power plants keep closing in California. Earlier this year, Southern California Edison announced it permanently would shut down its San

Lawmakers Push Backdoor Climate Change

JUNE 29, 2010 By KATY GRIMES Just in case California’s global warming legislation is suspended in November with passage of

Schwarzenegger Was The Acting Governor

JAN. 24. 2011 This article was first published in City Journal. By STEVEN GREENHUT As Arnold Schwarzenegger stepped down as