Medi-Cal paradox creating problems for both doctors and patients

MedicineCalifornia’s health program for the poor and disabled, Medi-Cal, has presented state lawmakers with quite a perplexing paradox. More and more people fall under the protection of Medi-Cal and need a doctor but fewer and fewer doctors are accepting the low fees associated with the program. While a simple solution may appear to be increasing the size of the Medi-Cal budget, Medi-Cal is already stretching the state budget and squeezing other programs. Thus, dealing with the Medi-Cal program has become a real problem for state lawmakers and the governor.

As former Gov. Schwarzenegger economic adviser David Crane pointed out in a Sacramento Bee op-ed, “Medi-Cal’s share of spending has grown 35 percent since Brown took office and now consumes one-sixth of the budget.”

Yet, while the Medi-Cal costs surged upward with new patients coming into the system, especially because of the Affordable Care Act, fees were cut for health care providers during the recent recession and have not been restored. Many providers have decided not to accept Medi-Cal patients because of the low reimbursement rate.

So, more patients seek doctors and other health care providers while fewer health care providers are available to see them. And raising the cost of the program jeopardizes the cautious fiscal management of the Brown administration that is concerned about what happens when there is another economic downturn.

Recently, Brown’s Director of Finance, Michael Cohen, told the press that the administration was willing to discuss boosting Medi-Cal reimbursement rates if that would guarantee greater access to doctors. How that guarantee is made to work is not certain.

There is no question that the health care providers should be more fairly compensated for their services and that all patients should be able to see a doctor. Given the increase in state revenues it is anticipated that some relief to the Medi-Cal program is in the offing. Yet, Brown is right to be concerned about an expanding budget.

While there seems no simple solution, not just the health care providers and the budget dollars should be considered. Another focus should be on the users of the system, their participation in the program and the opportunity for them to rise up and get free of the need for Medi-Cal assistance.

That California has nearly a third of its residents in need of Medi-Cal to provide health care is a sad commentary on the opportunity for the people to improve their circumstances. There are obstacles that could be removed, allowing the private sector to increase well-paying jobs. Then many of the people and their families using Medi-Cal can move away from the state sponsored health care and get company or individual health insurance.

Reducing obstacles to good job creation would go a long way toward relieving the burden on the Medi-Cal program.

In addition, health care providers have told me that they sometimes have to double and triple book Medi-Cal patients because they don’t appear for their appointments. The reason often suggested is that many patients are not required to pay anything for the appointment and thus put little value on the service. Some argue that a nominal co-pay by all patients would add value to the service and change the character of the program.

Most agree that Californians should receive health care due them and health care providers should be justly compensated for their work. However, there appears to be no Alexander’s sword to cut through the Gordian knot that is Medi-Cal.

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. Will
    Will 28 May, 2015, 23:18

    I have been saying, for years now, that Medi-Cal should require small co-payments for appointments, small co-pays for prescriptions and a bit larger co-payments to visit the emergency room. The emergency room is just that…for emergencies. Unfortunately, folks who “think” it is free run to the E.R. for hang nails or stomach aches. That kind of nonsense costs all of us.

    As far as folks missing their appointments without calling…etc…should be charged a fee like the rest of us. If they happen not to pay or refuse to pay the fees, then shut-down their coverage altogether. If they can not appreciate what they have, then they should not have it.

    Requiring co-payments is a HUGE step in the right direction to encourage financial solvency to Medi-Cal. In addition, clueless folks out there who take total advantage of their coverage now would think twice if they had to part with a little of their “own” money.

    By the way, all the savings that this would generate for Medi-Cal, use these savings to, once again, adequately and fully reimburse medical providers for their services.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
health careJerry BrownMedi-CalMedicine

Related Articles

Gridlock On Renewable Energy Highway

MAY 24, 2011 By K. LLOYD BILLINGSLEY California politicians want to draw 33 percent of the state’s energy needs from

CA pension reformers push ballot measure

The struggle over reforming California’s public pension system has been taken up a new notch. Given the poor track record of past efforts to

More dams or regulations to alleviate drought?

  American diplomat Dwight Morrow wrote, “Any party which takes credit for the rain must not be surprised if its opponents