Feds fluster Brown on Delta pump plan

Bishop, CA

Bishop, CA

Gov. Jerry Brown suffered another setback in his effort to gain the upper hand over California’s persistent drought. New details on alterations to his massive pumping plan, which would change the way the Delta region distributes the water that flows into it, revealed major changes that have aroused major opposition.

In a harsh editorial, the San Francisco Chronicle underscored that the altered scheme “will cost more, provide less water than originally envisioned (but more than pumped south now), restore less than half of the delta habitat than proposed, take longer to build and, most notably, lack the 50-year guarantee of water deliveries that made the old plan attractive.”

For that, Brown had federal regulators to blame. Environmental agencies objected that his half-century assurance “would lock in water deliveries without regard to shifting environmental conditions,” the Chronicle reported. Since that fact was inherent to any such promise, Brown had to drop it in order to proceed.

Measurement problems

The problem has been compounded by a simple dilemma: “nobody can say with certainty how much Delta water is actually being used by Delta farmers,” as the Sacramento Bee observed. “The state allows thousands of water rights holders to divert water directly from rivers and streams, but in most cases has no metering system in place to gauge just how much they take.” What’s more, relying on a meter system could simply produce unclear results, the Bee added, “because of the complexities of the estuary itself: a fragile natural ecosystem that’s been replumbed and reconfigured to deliver water to farms and cities to the south and west.”

The Delta drama played out amid state regulators’ first issuance of a fine for unauthorized water use in a farming district. “The proposed fine, which the district will likely contest in a coming hearing, is the first fine sought by the Board under a new structure in which water rights holders can be penalized for past unauthorized use of water, even if they have stopped diverting since,” Mother Jones noted.

Regulators, farmers, and others have clashed over measurements involving other sources of water, too. “California still doesn’t require that water pumped from underground be measured at all, much less factored into an overall assessment of total water resources,” according to a ProPublica reporter writing for the New York Times; “it’s merely an option under a new law signed last September.”

“California’s new groundwater legislation does require local water authorities to come up with sustainable groundwater plans, but they don’t have to do that until 2020, and they don’t have to balance their water withdrawals until 2040.”

Regulatory wrangling

Meanwhile, in Washington, Congressional Republicans have centered around a fresh push to reform the federal rules around how much California’s pumps can flow. The Western Water and American Food Security Act of 2015 boasted the support of House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. “We designed the bill to move as much water down south to our farms and to our cities as possible without making any fundamental changes to the environmental law,” said McCarthy.

“A bill by Republican Rep. David Valadao set for consideration Thursday would require that federal regulators maintain certain pumping levels unless the secretary of the Interior Department certifies that level would harm the long-term survival of the Delta smelt and no other alternatives to protect the smelt are available,” the Associated Press reported. “The 170-page bill also sets deadlines for the completion of feasibility studies to build or enlarge five dams in the state and ends efforts to build up salmon populations in the San Joaquin River.”

Observers expected the bill to meet the same fate as two previous attempts by the House GOP to pass federal drought relief for California on terms amenable to state and national Republicans, many of whom view strict environmental regulations as a major source of residents’ water woes. But Valadao, in a news conference covered by AP, said the legislation’s Senate outlook was “still up in the air,” with “some support” fueling hopes of a possible win.


Write a comment
  1. Hank
    Hank 25 July, 2015, 11:08

    We are and have been .raising Delta Smelt in hatcheries. With that in mind how are we “harming the long- term survival “of the smelt? I don’t think we must provide them with a swank neighborhood or a pleasant view. Just survival.

    Reply this comment
  2. Guardians of the shore
    Guardians of the shore 25 July, 2015, 15:30

    Illegal operations by the State of California are to blame. Shipping water south for Jerry Brown’s buddies to use in land butchering must stop. Water rights are based on law and custom going back thousands of years. The stealing of water from the rightful users and from the environment for the benefit of Brown and his buddies is a crime and a sin.

    Reply this comment
  3. Sall farmer
    Sall farmer 25 July, 2015, 17:37

    they say that farmers are big corporations, but not all of us are they call us gross polluters, funny I drink the water from my well and fed and take care of my family with the water from my land, how many of you can say the same after you wash your car, does that water flow to your land? And lastly there were no dams when our predecessors started gaming this land, not even a highway was in the valley. The town closes to my farm is where the boat would take people across the San Joaquin river. If you really want that food that you and your family put out for your meals to be as safe to eat as it has been for so many year please give us the water that we have rights to for over 100 years and let us fed you. The chemicals that have been banned here for the last twenty to thirty years are still in use in other country’s

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Redistricting Boosts Dem Dominance

June 11, 2011 By JOHN SEILER As I was the first to predict 15 months ago right here on CalWatchDog.com,

California high court says public records are public, even on a private email

SACRAMENTO – Earlier this month, the California Supreme Court unanimously overturned an appeals court decision that had provided a large loophole

Legislature approves $50-per-month diaper benefit

Low-income Californians could soon receive a monthly, $50 benefit for diaper purchases, according to a bill approved by the Legislature on