High-speed rail workshops will review environmental concerns

high-speed rail fly californiaThe High-Speed Rail Authority has restarted an aggressive plan to finish the environmental work on the San Francisco to San Jose and the San Jose to Merced segments of the High-Speed Rail Project. Completion of the final environmental documents is planned by the end of 2017. This is in addition to Caltrain’s electrification project, which is a separate process.

One workshop was held in San Francisco last week. [See the Palo Alto Online’s account for background information.] The next workshop is planned for this Tuesday, September 15, in San Jose from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. at the Roosevelt Community Center. A one hour presentation is planned at 6 p.m. at 901 E. Santa Clara St. San Jose, CA 95116. The Morgan Hill session will be held September 23rd. The last meeting will be held in Burlingame October 7th. The agenda for all workshops will be identical, regardless of location.

As background, at the August 2015 board meeting, the High-Speed Rail Authority approved a Request for Qualifications to be sent out. This RFQ covers both the San Jose to San Francisco segment as well as the San Jose to Merced segment. The consultant chosen will manage the corridor activity conducting “environmental analysis and documentation, regulatory permitting and compliance, engineering and preliminary design services.”  Whoever is selected, they are expected to finish the project by December 2017, a very quick process.

Contentious Segments

In the past, both of these segments (San Jose to Merced and San Jose to San Francisco) have been problematic for the Rail Authority. Besides the Peninsula’s vehement opposition to the high-speed rail project, the Merced to San Jose segment, featuring the Chowchilla Wye, was also an area of great contention because of the use of prime farmland and destructive of sensitive environmental areas.

[See the Youtube when Ben Tripousis, Northern California regional director presented the RFQ to the board on August 4, 2015. Here is the document presented at the Rail Authority board meeting.]

Peninsula history

As a reminder, the peninsula’s environmental work stalled for a couple of years due to questions about the joint use of the Caltrain corridor with High-Speed Rail.

This is more commonly known as the blended system first introduced in 2011 by Senator Joe Simitian, Congresswoman Anna Eshoo and Assembly member Rich Gordon, also called the SEG plan. There was extreme unhappiness about the high-speed train coming through the very crowded peninsula area with the real possibility of expansion of the corridor to four tracks.

The SEG plan required no above ground tracks be added to the corridor unless the cities desired that design; and that the high-speed rail plan stay within the current Caltrain footprint. It also required the blended plan be done in one stage. The rail authority had pushed for phased implementation eventually leading to four tracks which is no longer part of the plan today.

Questions of Legality

The high-speed rail board was under the leadership of Curt Pringle in 2011. He and others on the board had mixed emotions about the concept. Questions about the legality of the blended program were sent to the Attorney General’s office twice back in the 2011 by then CEO Roeof van Ark.

This year a public records request was sent to the Rail Authority asking what the result of those inquiries were but they refused to release any AG response, claiming attorney/client privilege.

The question of the legality of the blended system, along with trip time questions and financial viability will be litigated in part two of the Tos/Fukuda/Kings County lawsuit February 2016. [See Tos Trial Brief II on the TRANSDEF website which gives a bit of history about this taxpayers lawsuit.]

In the July 2012 appropriation vote, the state Legislature approved an appropriation of $600 million of Proposition 1A bond funds to Caltrain’s electrification project under the premise that it is a corridor that will eventually operate high-speed rail trains in the future. They also appropriated $500 million for the Los Angeles to Anaheim route though projects were not yet identified for that segment. Neither amount was presented in a funding plan as required in the Prop. 1A ballot measure.

Many, including former Rail Authority Chair Quentin Kopp, have questioned the legality of this appropriation and the idea of the blended system. In a declaration filed for the Tos/Fukuda/Kings County lawsuit, Kopp says he believes “the “track-sharing” arrangement with Caltrain represents one example (Los Angeles to Anaheim represents another) of the Authority’s current alteration of the project from a genuine HSR system.”

Environmental Process

Regardless of that argument, another issue blocking access to the bond funds for the San Francisco to San Jose segment is the non-completion of high-speed rail environmental work required under Prop. 1A on the Peninsula — hence the rush to finish the environmental work described above.

But how they will finish the environmental process is still unclear.

Will the Authority follow the California Environmental Quality Act or use the less stringent National Environmental Protection Act? Or will they use the CEQA process unless challenged in court therefore using the Surface Transportation Board ruling as an “ace in the hole”?

Two years ago, the Surface Transportation Board, a federal agency, exempted the Rail Authority from following CEQA because it is a railroad project under their control. But the end of the story has yet to be written regarding the subject of a CEQA exemption for rail projects as it is expected to be heard, and hotly debate, in the California Supreme Court sometime this year.

There are no American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 federal grants assigned to the San Francisco to San Jose or the San Jose to Merced segments nor is there private funding available. The project in the Central Valley to the San Fernando Valley currently has at least a $25 billion gap in funding.


Write a comment
  1. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 14 September, 2015, 18:53

    Yeah like stopping a highway over some stupid lizard

    Reply this comment
  2. desmond
    desmond 14 September, 2015, 19:52

    When the obstinate know it all is retired to a padded room with oatmeal served twice daily, this will be known as the Jerry Brown HSR Prisoner Transport System. 50 million people, 40 percent illegal, 80% having committed a felony. We can paint his d#=/head ( I.e. his cranium looks like a d?? k) on the front of the train. Perhaps another name, d#=/head’s train. Look at the picture above…yup, that is what it looks like

    Reply this comment
  3. bob
    bob 14 September, 2015, 20:12

    How many tens of billions of dollars with the Brown Turd waste on that train to nowhere?

    Reply this comment
  4. Dork
    Dork 16 September, 2015, 06:14

    This is a No Brainer, easy problem to Fix!, We Fully Fund it with Public Employee Retirement System Monies, they can keep the Huge and Vast Profits promised by this Fantastic Public Transportation project as Compensation for their Full Support for it.

    I would think ALL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES and their Unions, would be piddling on the floor to get in on this lucrative Investment in California’s future.

    Reply this comment
  5. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 16 September, 2015, 15:13

    The A-Train,Chattanooga Choo Choo,The Oragne Bloomom Special,The City of New Orleans, and other trains for songs now comes THE PORK TRAIN lets someone write a funny song about this

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

$3.9 Million Pension Demands Sunshine

JUNE 9, 2011 By K. Lloyd Billingsley Pension payments such as the $3.9 million in supplemental funds to Samuel Downing,

Prisoner-transfer bans rejected

APRIL 27, 2010 By KATY GRIMES In a sometimes contentious Public Safety Committee hearing earlier this month, Sen. Jeff Denham, R-Merced,

Air Quality Bill Stinks Up Capitol Hearing

MAY 3, 2011 By KATY GRIMES Get ready for some really costly and restrictive environmental bills being passed through the