Planned San Francisco monument pits city vs. revisionist Japan

comfort.womenSan Francisco supervisors’ 11-0 vote this week to put up a monument to the approximately 200,000 “comfort women” from Korea, China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Burma and elsewhere in Asia who were used as sex slaves by members of the Japanese military during World War II appears certain to cause embarrassment in Japan and result in broader international fallout.

Because of an about-face by Japan’s government, 70 years after World War II, bitterness in Asia over Japan’s formal practice of sex enslavement is intense and growing. It’s well-documented that the first military brothel with conscripted women was opened in 1942 in Indonesia by a Japanese Navy lieutenant, Yasuhiro Nakasone, who went on to become prime minister of Japan from 1982-1987.

But even though the Japanese government essentially apologized for the wartime sex slavery in 1993, the current Japanese government has a new position. This is from a New York Times report in November 2014. Once conceded …

… the Japanese military’s involvement in comfort stations is [now] bitterly contested. The government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is engaged in an all-out effort to portray the historical record as a tissue of lies designed to discredit the nation. Mr. Abe’s administration denies that imperial Japan ran a system of human trafficking and coerced prostitution, implying that comfort women were simply camp-following prostitutes.


The latest move came at the end of October when, with no intended irony, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party appointed Mr. Nakasone’s own son, former Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone, to chair a commission established to “consider concrete measures to restore Japan’s honor with regard to the comfort women issue.”

Nationalism drives historical rewrite

Imperial.Japanese.Army.flagThe historical revisionism may be a matter of embarrassment to Japanese-based multinational conglomerates which have to do business around the world. But it is playing well in Japan, and there are no signs of a domestic blowback to Abe’s decision. Here’s more from the New York Times:

The official narrative in Japan is fast becoming detached from reality, as it seeks to cast the Japanese people — rather than the comfort women of the Asia-Pacific theater — as the victims of this story. The Abe administration sees this historical revision as integral to restoring Japan’s imperial wartime honor and modern-day national pride. But the broader effect of the campaign has been to cause Japan to back away from international efforts against human rights abuses and to weaken its desire to be seen as a responsible partner in prosecuting possible war crimes.

The Japanese government’s changed position hasn’t been much in the news in the U.S., but it has been controversial in Asia for years and has also drawn unflattering coverage from the BBC.

The San Francisco supervisors’ resolution could easily lead to this becoming a big issue in the U.S., especially if such prominent San Francisco politicians as Sen. Dianne Feinstein and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi weigh in.

Similar, though far less weighty, flap in Virgina

The parallels with a 2013-14 controversy in the state of Virgina are plain, although that case was much less inflammatory. Here’s a Reuters summary:

Legislation requiring that the Korean name for the Sea of Japan be included in new school textbooks has become law in the U.S. state of Virginia, a victory for Korean-American campaigners backed by the South Korean government.


Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe signed the law earlier in the week, a spokesman confirmed on Thursday. The law requires textbooks to add the name “East Sea,” as the body of water that separates Japan and Korea is known in Korea.


Passage of the legislation represents a significant victory for vocal campaigners among Virginia’s 82,000 Korean-Americans, who greatly outnumber the state’s 19,000 ethnic Japanese.


The issue attracted intense lobbying not only from Korean-Americans but the governments of South Korea and Japan more than 7,000 miles away, which have been squabbling for years over the name for the sea.


It is a source of intense bitterness for Koreans that the “Sea of Japan” was standardized worldwide while Korea was under Japanese colonial rule.


Write a comment
  1. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 26 September, 2015, 09:41

    It was/is despicable conduct. No different from our “internment camps” in WWII, which we have fully recognized as despicable

    Reply this comment
  2. spurwing Plover
    spurwing Plover 26 September, 2015, 14:46

    Were on better relationship with Japan then we are with some of our WW II allies

    Reply this comment
  3. desmond
    desmond 27 September, 2015, 03:11

    Internment camps protected the Japanese from the rest of the citizens, no illegal moochers then. Kind of like, can anyone think of a better idea? Unfortunate, but they did what they intended.
    Same as Atom bombs. They worked.
    Can anyone imagine President Obama standing up to the Third Reich? God help us. Thanks to those with backbone.
    If it wasn’t for them, Obama would be picking cotton, in Nazi controlled USA. There would be no discussion of income inequality, minimum wage. Gays would be illegal. Killing them would be public entertainment.
    Gee, sounds like ISIS.
    Obama is a fool. When Russia docks carriers, destroyers(and nukes) in friendly Havana, and China is camped in the water off Hawaii in a offensive position, Obama’s naivete will be in full bloom. Well, at least he stabilized the middle East..not.
    Does everyone take comfort, the great one will be glued to the NFL network today? Perhaps not, golf first.

    Reply this comment
  4. mystic feline
    mystic feline 30 September, 2015, 23:53

    Bogus photo.
    The Korean girls in the picture above are *NOT* Comfort women.
    They are making “Comfort bags” for Japanese soldiers.
    Now, who is the real revisionist?
    Chris Reed, if you are a journalist, you need to make a good research before writing something.

    Reply this comment
  5. kuchan
    kuchan 1 October, 2015, 21:23

    For your info. and for your further study, please read following “Why Has South Korea Still Not Apologized to the Vietnam Comfort Women?” by Chris Grasso

    Reply this comment
  6. kuchan
    kuchan 1 October, 2015, 23:22

    One more for your info.
    The Comfort Women Issue in Sharper Focus by Tsutomu Nishioka

    Reply this comment
  7. moguro fukuzo
    moguro fukuzo 19 March, 2016, 04:44

    Shame on the hypocrites in San Francisco

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Reagan Day symbolism

Republicans are pushing a bill to create a Ronald Reagan Day — a state day honoring the former president. Although

Kashkari makes splash in new job with Fed

California’s 2014 Republican gubernatorial nominee Neel Kashkari has dropped a bombshell in his new job as president of the Minneapolis

Obamacare: Your insurance plan is cancelled

If you have a job and are a member of the middle class, that pain you are feeling is the