Brown’s Delta tunnel project draws strong opposition

Stop the TunnelsTo his cherished high-speed rail project, Gov. Jerry Brown can now add his ambitious Delta tunnel project to the list of big plans arousing strong opposition.

Especially in the Delta region itself, public opinion has turned sharply against the scheme, which would cost over $15 billion dollars and reshape the area with massive infrastructure construction. “In recent weeks, opponents protested at the state Capitol and submitted volumes of critical comments to state and federal officials on the environmental impact of the plan,” the Sacramento Bee reported. “A wealthy Stockton-area farmer and food processor, Dean Cortopassi, qualified for the November 2016 ballot a measure that could complicate the project, if not stop it altogether.”

On the other hand, according to the Bee, the upheaval “didn’t appear to tilt controversy surrounding the project beyond its traditional bearings. Delta landowners, Northern Californians and many environmentalists have for years opposed a conveyance, while labor unions and building trades groups that stand to benefit from a project support it.”

But over the course of a public comment period on the proposal, Brown’s plan was subjected to withering criticism from a vocal minority of Californians. “By midday Friday, 2,340 unique letters had been submitted, along with 6,665 form letters and 19,047 letters that were the result of online petitions, a spokeswoman with the California Natural Resources Agency said. That’s in addition to about 2,000 unique letters and 10,000 form letters received last year in response to an earlier version of the tunnels plan,” Recordnet reported.

Big blowback

One such comment came from Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., who called the tunnel project a “multi-billion boondoggle,” according to the Appeal Democrat. “If we allow the Delta to be drained by a massive new plumbing system, it will put at risk many Delta jobs and forever change the Delta’s culture and quality of life,” he wrote.

Garamendi’s constituents have largely agreed. “The project to divert some Sacramento River water before it reaches the estuary is controversial, particularly in San Joaquin County and the rest of the Delta,” as Recordnet observed. “Opponents have relentlessly attacked the project from multiple fronts — questioning its economics, warning about its environmental impacts, and predicting hard times ahead for Delta farmers.”

But Brown has stuck to his guns, blasting the negative comments and vowing that the project would make a decisive and urgently needed difference in California’s distribution and consumption of water. “The delta pipeline is essential to […] protecting fish and water quality. Without this fix, San Joaquin farms, Silicon Valley and other vital centers of the California economy will suffer devastating losses in their water supply,” he said in a prepared statement. “Claims to the contrary are false, shameful and do a profound disservice to California’s future.”

Debating democracy

Instead of dissipating the tension, however, Brown’s words have only added to it, helping ensure that the issue will come to a head at the ballot box, when voters weigh in on Cortopassi’s initiative. He and his wife, the Bee noted, “have bankrolled the No Blank Checks Initiative ballot effort, pumping $4 million into the petition drive, consultants and other expenses since March.”

“Under his proposed ballot measure, any revenue bonds for public works involving the state would have to go to a public vote. That would complicate Brown’s planned strategy to pay for the twin tunnels, which rests on water users financing bonds to help fund the $15 billion project.”

As George Skelton suggested at the Los Angeles Times, some skepticism toward the initiative has centered around the potential problems inherent in turning over the fate of all similar large-scale projects to the whims of voters. “But the tunnel project was purposely set up to avoid the electorate. Politicians and their appointees are making all the decisions,” he noted.

6 comments

Write a comment
  1. Just Another Disgruntled Citizen
    Just Another Disgruntled Citizen 11 November, 2015, 15:33

    Why does this remind me of the tunnel through the high-intensity mountains of Southern California proposed for the High-Speed Rail project? The Delta tunnel isn’t as expensive, of course, but it is still a boondoggle to nowhere.

    Reply this comment
    • ricky65
      ricky65 12 November, 2015, 09:30

      Its very interesting. When dubious projects like the Brown Streak or Jerry’s Delta tunnels of love project meet the inevitable ferocious public opposition a curious phenomenon occurs.
      The planners (or pipe dreamers, in this case) have a tendency to go underground as if that alone will quell public opposition.
      Tunneling then becomes the way to get around rational arguments as to whether the project is economically feasible, constructable, or even makes any rational sense at all.

      Reply this comment
  2. desmond
    desmond 11 November, 2015, 18:07

    Wouldn t want to be working on this construction.
    Accidents will happen.

    Reply this comment
    • ricky65
      ricky65 12 November, 2015, 09:39

      You are correct. I spent most of my life in the engineering field and been in charge of many large civil projects.
      Boring 30 mile long twin 33 foot tunnels hundreds of feet below the Delta through peat soils will cost lives and the cost overruns will be enormous.
      I suppose nothing these days is un-constructable if the agencies in charge have enough money. But this project comes closest to that reality as any I have ever seen.

      Reply this comment
  3. Just Another Disgruntled Citizen
    Just Another Disgruntled Citizen 12 November, 2015, 08:56

    Now, if you’ve been watching Caltrans at work on freeway widenings and other improvements, how many collapsed bridges have there been during construction in the past year? Five years? Ten? Twenty? Fifty? Miles of freeway is a false factor, this is an absolute scale because of the moral imperative not to make these kind of mistakes, period. I never heard of so many man-made disasters until recent years.

    I rest my case.

    Reply this comment
  4. Spurwing Plover
    Spurwing Plover 18 November, 2015, 09:08

    Kind of reminds me of the preposed perifiual Canal they wanted to use to pump all of Northrn Californiaswater for the orange groves and beverly hills swimming pools

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Did fear of political Waterloo spur bullet-train switch?

Earlier this month, in one of the biggest changes in the history of the state’s bullet-train project, California High-Speed Rail Authority

SoCal support for bullet train wavers

California’s beleaguered high-speed rail project has hit yet another speed bump: a loss of confidence among Southern California officials already

State senate committee approves minimum wage hike

California’s minimum wage workers will receive a 62.5 percent raise over three years if Senate Bill 3 is approved by