Caltrans accused of improperly dumping dead animals again

DSCN0442After discovering work crews had dumped a bunch of dead animals in a state waterway, a state Water Code enforcer is investigating if Caltrans ever created and implemented roadkill disposal policies, which was a requirement from the last time Caltrans got in trouble for improperly dumping dead animals. 

A stockpile of dead animals, as well as other contaminates like dirt and asphalt, was found in a drainage ditch — considered a waterway — by a North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board inspector in Mendocino County. 

As barbaric as it seems at first glance, Caltrans has the unenviable task of removing roadkill from the roadways, which means the remains must be disposed of somewhere, to which there are procedures.  

In 2008, state lawmakers created stricter regulations for how Caltrans would dispose of animal carcasses after it was discovered that Caltrans was dumping the dead animals in a way that allowed some of the carcasses to roll into Saratoga Creek in Saratoga. Mass graves were found in Sausalito as well.

In addition to amending the Highway Code requiring that animal carcasses be disposed of at least 150 feet from waterways, the 2008 law required Caltrans to come up with procedures on how it would dispose of the carcasses. 

Caltrans policy was to have its area superintendents establish their own procedures for handling roadkill. Caltrans has until May 27 to provide evidence of the procedures to the waterboard.

Caltrans spokesman Matt Rocco told CalWatchdog that the department was “working with our District offices to coordinate an official response to this order.”

Caltrans has so far been unable to provide evidence of the local procedures to CalWatchdog. We’ll update this story as needed. 

The animals were dumped within 150 feet of the waterway, regardless of Caltrans’ policies. But the waterboard does not enforce the Highway Code, so another agency would have had to seek action on that allegation. 

The waterboard is concerned with the disposal policies, particularly because of the impact decaying animals can have on the water supply. 

“Decaying animal carcasses and/or parts may cause or contribute to exceedances of applicable water quality objectives in the waters of the state (e.g., pathogens, nutrients, dissolved oxygen), especially when placed in a concentrated manner,” according to the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board.

This is not the first time Caltrans has shown disregard for laws protecting against groundwater contamination. A few months ago, CalWatchdog reported that for almost a quarter of a century, Caltrans flaunted state and local laws regulating drilling practices an estimated 10,000 times (though the number has since jumped to 20,000). 

The Waterboard is asking for the procedures of multiple Caltrans regions and districts. Failure to comply could result in fines of up to $5,000 per day by the regional water board and up to $25,000 per day by a court, according to the notice. 


Write a comment
  1. Standing Fast
    Standing Fast 14 May, 2016, 12:05

    Well, it just goes to show it’s always something.
    Maybe we need a volunteer Citizens Watchdog Commission to keep track of everything the hapless staff at Caltrans and other State agencies are doing. Made up of representatives of every special interest group on all sides of every issue so they can keep each other in line as they poke their noses into the People’s Business.
    I don’t know.
    Why do public agencies think they can get away with all this stuff?

    Reply this comment
  2. bob
    bob 14 May, 2016, 12:58

    They’re the gooberment. They can get away with any damn thing they want.

    And if they do get nailed it’s always the taxpayers who pay.

    Reply this comment
  3. Sergio
    Sergio 15 May, 2016, 18:59

    I guarantee you that Caltrans staff do not benefit from their standard operating procedures. They have a budget and try to work within it. Why woud not the taxpayers pay for all the extra costs? It’s a taxpayer issue.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:

Related Articles

State Supreme Court ruling could make local ballot initiatives more difficult

A recent unanimous ruling by the California Supreme Court (pictured) that may force the city of San Diego to retroactively

Hertzberg seeks permanent extension to taxpayer relief program

As California taxpayers brace for another round of tax increases this session, they’ve found an unlikely ally in the state Legislature.

East Coast front opens in Filner war on women

Wednesday was a very bad day for Bob Filner, who was purportedly in his third day of an intensive two-week