Largest CA community college faces dire problems

ccsfIn 2012, the City College of San Francisco persuaded voters to adopt a $79 parcel tax to stave off bankruptcy. Now the school — the largest based on enrollment in the California Community College system — is once again coming to voters for help, seeking to increase the annual parcel tax to $99 and move back its sunset from 2021 to 2032.

Measure B requires two-thirds’ voter support. If adopted, it would provide $19 million a year, up from the present $15 million.

The selling points for the measure build off the idea that the community college has turned the corner from its recent problems with the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, which has voiced concerns since 2011 that the college has few internal financial controls, has spent money in unfocused ways and has provided inadequate student services. Voters are also told that CCSF is actively trying to shore up its funding by recruiting foreign students — especially from Asia — who pay far more in tuition, much as the University of California system did beginning 10 years ago.

But Measure B critics offer evidence that undercuts the assertion that the college’s biggest problems are mostly behind it.

The accreditation commission still has not given its blessing to CCSF; a final decision on whether to revoke accreditation is expected in January. And claims that CCSF had developed much better financial controls were undercut by a December 2015 San Francisco Chronicle report that detailed seemingly profligate spending by college officials.

While college trustees defended President Virginia Parras’ trip to China, Taiwan and Vietnam as a smart student recruitment effort, the Chronicle found heavy spending by school officials at local restaurants with little documentation of any benefit that accrued to CCSF. Such documentation is supposed to be mandatory and seems certain to be viewed by the accreditation commission as evidence its years of admonitions have not worked.

Enrollment plunging and faculty fleeing

The Chronicle reported this month that the accreditation flap had taken a harsh toll on enrollment, which has plunged from 84,000 full- and part-time students in 2012 to the present 62,000. Meanwhile, state aid meant to help stabilize the college is going away. After getting a total of $69 million last fiscal year and this fiscal year, CCSF has been told to expect no such funding in 2017-18.

But CCSF’s headaches don’t stop there. The high cost of housing is making it difficult for the college to attract and retain teachers and staff. The extra $4 million that the new version of parcel tax would generate annually is going to be used to address this problem.

One of the strategies that state officials have undertaken to help CCSF caught the eye of Inside Higher Education, a national journal. In January, it noted that the California Community College’s Board of Governors endorsed dropping the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges as the agency handling accrediting for CCC’s 113 campuses based on a critical report from a CCC task force.

The move prompted criticism from one accreditation veteran, noted Inside Higher Education. 

“There’s no short-term solution other than CCSF getting its act together and getting accredited by [Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges], and it appears the commission is hanging tough and not changing its position,” said Ralph Wolff, former president of the WASC Senior College and University Commission, the main community college accrediting oversight agency in the Western U.S.

The unusually complex background to the Measure B vote may make its approval unlikely. But there’s another daunting factor facing proponents: In addition to the 17 state ballot measures on the Nov. 8 ballot, San Francisco voters will be asked to consider 25 city and regional ballot measures. Most election observers think the more decisions that more voters have on ballot measures, the more likely they are to vote no — or to not vote at all — on many proposals.

 

No comments

Write a comment
No Comments Yet! You can start the discussion, add a comment to this post.

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

A billion here, a billion there for high-speed rail

“A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking real money,” Sen Everett Dirksen, R-Ill., supposedly said, although

Tax agency gets special treatment

Nov. 1, 2012 Katy Grimes: Californians already know that the thousands of laws and regulations passed every year by the

Maviglio upset about our optometry articles

Our recent articles on an optometrists’ bill upset powerful Democratic consultant Steve Maviglio, currently the spokesman for Assembly Speaker John