CalWatchdog Morning Read – January 3

  • Proposed ballot measure asks if state should take action it already took
  • Kern County law enforcement under fire
  • Did California legalize child prostitution?
  • Making sense of Trump
  • Kamala Harris’ coronation?

Good morning. Happy New Year! We start this year with a question: Should California’s elected officials do everything in their power to make the country decide presidential elections by a national popular vote?

A recently introduced ballot measure asks just that, coming on the heels of the second presidential election since 2000 where the candidate with the most votes lost in the Electoral College, which is mostly a winner-take-all system based on statewide popular vote.

But there’s one catch: California passed legislation in 2011 joining a national effort to scrap the current system in favor of the national popular vote, which CalWatchdog wrote about in February. 

Besides being largely redundant, the ballot measure would be merely advisory, with no force of law (the measure only asks if policy makers should do something; it doesn’t direct them to do anything). It’s similar in effect to Prop. 59 from the November ballot, which focused on campaign finance law. 

“My focus is less on exact means than on the goal,” said the measure’s proponent, Rod Howard, an attorney who specializes in mergers and acquisitions. “The interstate NPV compact is one approach, and an ingenious one. But it’s only one approach, and it does not yet have the force of law.”

CalWatchdog has more.

In other news:

  • Law enforcement: “A year after being branded by a London newspaper as America’s most lethal police force, the Bakersfield Police Department and the Kern County Sheriff’s Office are now the subjects of civil rights investigations by the state Attorney General’s Office.” CalWatchdog has more. 

  • Fact check: “A misleading column about a new state law by an Orange County lawmaker has sparked inaccurate online reports taking off on Facebook. Assemblyman Travis Allen, R-Huntington Beach, wrote a piece for the Washington Examiner under the headline ‘California Democrats legalize child prostitution,’ which has been cut and pasted by a variety of partisan websites as the basis for their false claims.” The Sacramento Bee has more. 

  • Trump: “If you struggle to get a handle on some of President-elect Donald Trump’s comments, here’s a hint: Don’t take him literally. Sometimes Trump shoots from the hip, before he’s thought things through. Sometimes, at least during the campaign, he’d repeat lines that roused the crowd. And there’s a growing perception that sometimes, he’s doing what he’s spent his career doing – being a negotiator, not a typical politician whose words you take at face value.” The Orange County Register has more. 

  • Kamala Watch: “California’s newest U.S. senator, Kamala Harris, faces extraordinarily high expectations as she takes her oath of office on Tuesday,” Politico reports.


  • Back tomorrow. 

Gov. Brown:

  • No public events scheduled.

Tips: [email protected]

Follow us: @calwatchdog @mflemingterp

New follower: @alastairjam

1 comment

Write a comment
  1. Standing Fast
    Standing Fast 3 January, 2017, 16:27

    Folks, this whole controversy over getting rid of the Electoral College is based on a complete misunderstanding of American Government. I think the issue arose because there are so many new voters who are uninformed or misinformed.

    Then, there are the folks who know better but do not like American Government. They would like to get rid of the Declaration of Independence and/or the Constitution and/or the Bill of Rights.

    If they understood the meaning of “federal” they would know it meant an organization of states, each with equal powers. We elect the President of the Unites States on a state-by-state basis. Within each state, each voter has an equal say in the election, and the candidate with the most votes either wins all of the electors or his share of the electors depending how the people of each state choose to assign them.

    If we change to a popular election, then the states of New York and California will always have the final say in who is president. This means the candidates will not need to bother campaigning in smaller states and the voters there might as well skip the presidential election.

    If you think this is a superior system, then I suggest you move to a place where this is the way they do things. We’ve had an electoral college for two hundred years and it has served us well. It is the system that elected Abraham Lincoln. If hadn’t been president during the Civil War, the South would have won, slaves would not have been freed, there would be no constitutional amendment prohibiting slavery, and both the Union and the Confederacy would have been unable to prevent European powers from invading our borders.

    The consequences would not have been pretty.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Jobs crash endangers Brown budget

Uh oh. Just a day after Gov. Jerry Brown's budget spending splurge proposal, the latest U.S. jobs numbers came in.

CA greens pretend fracking’s past like an ‘X File’ coverup

@chrisreed99: Many #Fracking practices are secret including but not limited to chemicals. Covered-UP extensively starting in 70s. @TXsharon — Andrea

Key Graph Shows Housing Boom-Bust

John Seiler: Except for Nevada, California was hardest hit by the boom-bust of the housing market during the previous decade.