Major online privacy bill becomes law after whirlwind week

A far-reaching online privacy bill that got next-to-no vetting or legislative debate was signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown last Thursday – the product of a quickly hammered-out agreement among state legislators, privacy advocates, tech firms and a real estate tycoon whose qualifying of an even more sweeping privacy measure for the November ballot triggered a frenzy of action at the Capitol in the past week.

Assembly Bill 375 – the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 – would change the playing field in the relationship between users of some online services and the companies that provide the services. It would allow users to ask companies to delete their personal information and to be informed what information about them that the companies were collecting and selling. It would also allow online consumers to sue over some unauthorized breaches of their information – but only for up to $750.

The San Francisco developer who reportedly spent more than $3 million to gather signatures for his ballot measure told the Sacramento Bee that AB375 – while not as far-reaching as his proposal – was more than good enough. Alastair Mactaggart said he was willing to compromise and gain “certainty” of online privacy reforms rather than take on tech giants in a heavy spending free-for-all in the fall election. He pulled his initiative after AB375 was signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Thursday afternoon – just before the deadline for its possible withdrawal with the Secretary of State’s Office. Brown’s signing came after the bill won unanimous approval from both the Assembly and Senate.

The process under which a measure that qualified for the ballot could be pulled if proponents were satisfied with the Legislature’s alternative was established in a 2014 state law that was billed as an important refinement to the state’s system of direct democracy. The bill was championed by then-Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento.

The most important differences between Mactaggart’s proposal and AB375 is that it gives tech companies more certainty of their own that there would be legal limits on their exposure to damage claims from those using their services.

The bill quickly made it to Brown’s desk despite warning from key players.

Tech lobbyist: At least ‘even worse’ measure is dead

The Internet Association, a lobbying group for tech firms with significant online presence, issued a statement decrying “many problematic provisions” in the bill and “the unprecedented lack of debate or full legislative process.” But the association said it would not “obstruct or block AB375 … because it prevents the even worse ballot initiative from becoming law in California.”

The state Senate Judiciary Committee, which approved AB375 on Tuesday, did so even though chairwoman Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, expressed “grave, grave concerns about this legislation” to the San Francisco Chronicle. But she also praised its consumer-friendly elements, which take effect in 2020.

While California, as the nation’s largest and wealthiest state, often finds its policies emulated by other states, it’s not clear if AB375 will be copied in other capitals. Companies like Google, Amazon, Comcast and AT&T have steadily increased lobbying and campaign contributions in many states and may try to get what they consider model online privacy legislation passed elsewhere – so it could in theory compete with California’s version.

However, Facebook voiced its support for the state bill. “While not perfect, we support AB375 and look forward to working with policymakers on an approach that protects consumers and promotes responsible innovation,” a Facebook official told the Sacramento Bee.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Dude McCool
    Dude McCool 2 July, 2018, 08:53

    If Facebook and the rest of the tech industry approve of this bill, you know it favors them instead of us.

    Reply this comment
  2. Queeg
    Queeg 2 July, 2018, 09:19

    Comrades

    They “know” if you got holes in your socks or skivvies!

    Reply this comment
  3. Sammy the Oregon Bull
    Sammy the Oregon Bull 4 July, 2018, 06:26

    The ENTIRE FANG tech ecosystem is predicated on the sale of ever-more ‘granular’ personal information.

    Which we give them for free.

    Did you know that: 1) Facebook slaps a copyright on every photo and shred of information you place on your Facebook profile? After all, they say, you are using THEIR PLATFORM…. FACEBOOOK OWNS YOUR FACE!
    2) When you ‘sync’ your Android cell phone with your gmail account you voluntarily GIVE the Alphabet Corporation (Google) EVERYTHING-texts, numbers called and received, location data, websites viewed, pictures, apps used, etc. This data is then RESOLD to whomever will pay for it. I am consistently amazed at the extent to which otherwise intelligent people don’t understand this; or refuse to..Your information is a VALUABLE COMMODITY. Try to wrap your heads around this, please! Would you give ME something, anything for NOTHING? Would you hand over to me, WITHOUT A WARRANT, every scrap of information about your life in exchange for a shiny little tech bauble whose functionality is now EASILY replicated on a secure system? That is, if you really need the functionality of all those little apps…..(I don’t)

    OK-trolls: cue an immediate diversion with some pithy snarcasm.

    Reply this comment
    • Queeg
      Queeg 4 July, 2018, 08:41

      Comrade Bully

      And they know the size of your globalized polka dot skivvies!

      And.. and they have algo’s forecasting your calorie intake for those makers of packaged salty diet meals that show up at your door from the warehouses from Hell!!!!

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Chris Reed

Chris Reed

Chris Reed is a regular contributor to Cal Watchdog. Reed is an editorial writer for U-T San Diego. Before joining the U-T in July 2005, he was the opinion-page columns editor and wrote the featured weekly Unspin column for The Orange County Register. Reed was on the national board of the Association of Opinion Page Editors from 2003-2005. From 2000 to 2005, Reed made more than 100 appearances as a featured news analyst on Los Angeles-area National Public Radio affiliate KPCC-FM. From 1990 to 1998, Reed was an editor, metro columnist and film critic at the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin in Ontario. Reed has a political science degree from the University of Hawaii (Hilo campus), where he edited the student newspaper, the Vulcan News, his senior year. He is on Twitter: @chrisreed99.

Related Articles

Prop. 66 caps death penalty appeals at five years. So then what happens?

Next week, voters will consider not one but two measures involving the death penalty — one speeds up the process

Pension Funds' Odd Incentives

OCT. 12, 2010 By DAVE ROBERTS Billionaire investor Warren Buffett has compared investing in the stock market to gambling in

AEG employs terrorist threat study in L.A. stadium battle

AEG, the sports and entertainment firm trying to bring the NFL to downtown Los Angeles, has escalated the war over