So much for moderate Republicans

John Seiler:

A computer couldn’t come up with a candidate more moderate Republican than Meg Whitman. And she’s rich and willing to spend $160 million, too. Her computer-date running mate, Abel Maldonado, also was a poster-boy for Republican moderation. So was Mike Villines, the moderate Republican running for insurance commissioner.

Carly Fiorina was more conservative, mainly because she was pro-life. But she certainly was far more moderate than Chuck DeVore, whom she beat in the primary (although not more more moderate than Tom Campbell, whom she also beat).

Result: moderate Republican wipeout. Fiorina actually did the best of the Republicans who ran statewide.

If Republicans had run Tom McClintock and other proven tax-cutters, instead of an amateur like Meg and tax-increasers like Villines and Maldonado, they would have swept the state.

Of course, then all those Republican consultants would not have gotten their hands on Meg’s megamillion lottery cash.

Oh, and how did “far right” Republican Ron Paul do in his re-election bid in Texas? He’s the guy who’s openly for ending all those foreign wars, legalizing drugs, ending Social Security and other welfare programs, abolishing the inflationary Federal Reserve Board, and shrinking the federal government to almost nothing. An obstetrician, he’s also solidly pro-life.

Paul got 79% of the vote. That’s not a typo. 79%. It shows what principle and hard work get you.

And his son, Rand Paul, who’s almost as good as his old man, won a U.S. Senate seat from Kentucky, despite the whole state establishment — Democrat and Republican — labeling him an extremist.

So let’s not hear any more about how only moderate Republicans can win in California. If they can’t win this year, they can’t win any year.

California Republicans need to refashion themselves into a Ron Paul-Tom McClintock-style libertarian juggernaut. Otherwise, elephants, just stay home.

Nov. 3, 2010


Write a comment
  1. Steve Waechter
    Steve Waechter 3 November, 2010, 09:20

    There is just no replacement for integrity.

    The losers weren’t perceived as having sufficient principles.

    So even spending hundreds of millions of dollars didn’t help.

    Reply this comment
  2. H. Young
    H. Young 3 November, 2010, 18:09

    They also weren’t perceived as knowledgeable enough about CA government to be effective in it. Newbies…. “Anti-gov’t” only works if you actually know something about it, is what it looks like to me.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

UCLA studies add up to grim picture of CA housing costs

California’s politicians have finally made dealing with the state’s worst-in-the-nation poverty rate a priority. Efforts to increase the minimum wage

Mixed GOP reaction to Donnelly: Dumb-de-dumb-dumb

The California Republican Party is now very, very down on its luck. But I think state party chair Jim Brulte

Update: Moorlach wins, Glazer advances to run-off for CA Senate

Update: 8 am, March 18, 2015: With 100 percent of the precincts in, according to the Secretary of State, John