Solar company faces dark days ahead

Katy Grimes: The day after the election, the Los Angeles Times reported that Solyndra Inc., a solar power system manufacturing company in the San Francisco Bay area, is closing one of its factories, laying off 40 employees and letting the contracts for more than 150 temporary workers expire.

It’s hard not to question the timing of this information.

Even with substantial government subsidies, credits and loan guarantees, many are wondering if Solyndra enticed by the Schwarzenegger administration and/or opponents of Prop 23 to keep the news of the downsize quiet until after Tuesday’s election, in order to guarantee failure of the proposition. It certainly appears so.

The Times reported Solyndra had received “a $535-million federal loan guarantee, more than $1 billion in private equity funds and supportive visits from dignitaries such as  Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Energy Secretary Steven Chu, Vice President joe Biden and President Barack Obama.”

Backers of AB32, California’s overreaching 2006 global warming act, promised green jobs for everyone. The governor has been an aggressive, vocal proponent of the green industry in California – a position that now only looks like an attempt to gain a legacy – any legacy.

Proponents of Prop. 23, the ballot initiative that would have suspended AB 32 until California unemployment drops to 5.5 percent, have been warning that California’s manufacturing jobs are leaving the state due to business-stifling regulations in the state, and that China has become a formidable competitor.

And now suddenly it’s news that a large, publicly subsidized solar manufacturer is scaling back?

Joe Vranich, a California Business Relocation Coach, has been keeping track of the companies leaving the state, including many solar manufacturers who have been relocating to Oregon, Georgia  and other business-friendly states.

By October 12, Vranich had counted 158 companies leaving California, which is more than three times the total of 2009. Read through Vranich’s list and notice how many of the companies are green-tech companies.

It’s more than just a downsizing for Solyndra – it’s a slap in the face to the Department of Energy. The DOE used Solyndra as an example of a company benefitting from the stimulus package and loan-guarantee program, expecting that it would create green jobs. It was a very expensive program built on hope and change.

Is anyone in California listening?

NOV. 5, 2010

No comments

Write a comment
  1. John Seiler
    John Seiler 5 November, 2010, 18:23

    The exodus begins.

    Reply this comment
  2. EastBayLarry
    EastBayLarry 6 November, 2010, 04:53

    No, the exodus continues…

    Reply this comment
  3. Tom Tanton
    Tom Tanton 6 November, 2010, 12:34

    …well how about “exodus accelerates?” Actually I’m more concerned that the annoucement appears to have been delayed for purely political reasons, and funded with tax dollars to boot.

    …and Katy, it’s less a slap in the face to DOE, than a slap in the face to every voter in California, that was duped by the “green jobs will save our economy!” lie.

    Thanks for an excellent article.

    Reply this comment
  4. Todd K
    Todd K 7 November, 2010, 08:29

    They had to cover it up. It is the perfect example of where we are headed in California. I am involved in a project that is considering using Solyndra solar panels at a cost of about $183k. Even with the government subsidies of $87k the ROI is over 8 years. Without the subsidies to both the manufacturing side and end user side, the solar panels would need to be replaced before they break even. However, if the cost of electricity is driven up 300%, then it pencils. Thus the need for cap and tax. I think a good investment in California would be in gas stations along I15 and I80 near the Nevada border. All of the people leaving California will need gas.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CalWatchdog Morning Read – June 15

  Transparency duel Budget by midnight Welfare rule to be repealed Gun control advances Crisis looming for energy grid expansion?

California Coastal Commission keeps grabbing land

Oct. 23, 2012 By Katy Grimes What do you get when you have a powerful state commission of 11 unremarkable

Presidents abusing power: L.A. Times’ hypocrisy is immense

Feb. 6, 2013 By Chris Reed When the Bush administration responded to 9-11 by using “advanced interrogation techniques” and detaining