Best Budget Deal is No Deal

John Seiler:

State senate Republicans continue to be pressed to sell out and vote to put a tax-increase on a special June ballot.

They should resist the temptation.

The real problem remains profligate state spending from the Davis-Schwarzenegger years. The solution is not to gouge Californians yet again with new taxes that would slam each California family for another $5,000 over the next five years.

The solution is to cut the waste in government, beginning with lavish pensions to current and even retired government workers.

Is it short-circuiting democracy to not have a vote, as Brown and others maintain? No. We’ve had plenty of elections lately. We don’t need them several times a year at the whim of the governor.

But if he wants elections, how about also putting on the ballot:

1. Tax cuts.

2. Pension reform.

3. A restoration of the Gann Limit on spending.

Failing to do so, while giving voters only the option of destroying the state even more with economy-killing tax increases, would be a mockery of democracy.

March 14, 2011

No comments

Write a comment
  1. RObert
    RObert 14 March, 2011, 23:58

    WIll be a long hot summer.

    Reply this comment
  2. Roy Bleckert
    Roy Bleckert 15 March, 2011, 15:44

    But if he wants elections, how about also putting on the ballot:

    1. Tax cuts. ( I vote YES )

    2. Pension reform. ( I vote YES )

    3. A restoration of the Gann Limit on spending. ( I vote a BIG definite YES )

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Picking mayors: When will L.A. voters be as smart as N.Y. voters?

Feb. 8, 2013 By Chris Reed Despite some pension reforms and program cuts, the city of Los Angeles remains in

Pathetic media never report Obama’s support for fracking

March 12, 2013 By Chris Reed It’s bad enough that the media consistently depict hydraulic fracturing as new when it’s

‘Paycheck protection’: CA shouldn’t give up hope on checking unions yet

After the failure of three ballot attempts in the past 15 years to require unions to give their members veto