Managing Budget Garbage Pain


Katy Grimes: The threats of massive cuts to police, fire, sheriff, teachers, and parole programs are just not as visible as a city that has let the grass grow in parks or doesn’t pick up the garbage. Missing a few garbage pickups will get everyone’s attention quickly when dealing with budget threats and cuts to city staff.

Welcome to Sacramento – the city which let the grass in regional parks grow to knee-height, until neighborhood volunteers took over the big maintenance projects, but not without a fight.

I live in a downtown Sacramento neighborhood which is facing not just threats of cuts to our park, police and schools, we are battling garbage and yard debris pickups. And the city vehemently denies that there is an organized “sickout,” but most drivers have called in sick.

On the busiest, visible streets, and for residents who “opted out” of using yard waste cans — which are only picked up eight times a year — neighbors say that it seems waste pickups in Land Park and South Land Park are much less frequent. Daily sightings of garbage trucks and claw machines occur, but only whizzing past the homes with piles of yard waste and overflowing garbage and recycle cans.

With the recent winds, rains as well as the long wet winter in Sacramento, the city is not addressing the increased debris from trees – huge branches, and more leaves than usual filling yards, gutters and now piles of yard waste and cans. Neighbors complain that they cannot put large branches in the cans, or if they are able to with the help of a chain saw, there is no room for the regular yard debris.

Sacramento is known as the tree capitol of the world, and Land Park, immediately south of the city is tree-lined and is home to a large regional park. Given the tree designation, the yard waste is significant. Historically, the city of Sacramento has always allowed piles of yard waste piled at the curb. Picked up weekly, the yard waste piles have not been embraced by all residents, given the increased city parking limitations on residential streets and overflow parking problems from Sacramento City College.

But in recent months, the city of Sacramento announced that it had purchased new yard waste cans for my neighborhood. Residents would receive a discount for accepting the cans, or would eventually pay extra to keep a yard waste pile on the street.

The new 50-gallon can increased the number of residents’ garbage cans to three – one traditional 50-gallon garbage can, one 50-gallon recycling can, and now the 50-gallon yard waste can. This creates a storage and space problem for most residents.

However, the city has only occasionally been scooping up the piles of yard waste or emptying the yard waste bins in my neighborhood. But the billing charges have not decreased with the diminished service, while the yard waste piles in front of my neighbor’s homes have been piling up for eight weeks.

There seems to be a standoff between the Land Park residents and the city — but no one is talking. Neighbors have called the city to complain but report they are told by the city that the yard waste piles will only be picked up when they get to it – particularly for the residents who received the yard waste cans. Now, after two months, neighbors report the yard waste piles will be picked up on May 24.

Unlike the newer neighborhoods in Sacramento, my neighborhood is made up of homes built as early as the 1900’s, with most built in the 1920’s and 1930’s – the trees are huge, many, and leave a great deal of debris behind. What works for one downtown neighborhood does not work for another.

Choosing to keep a yard waste pile or receiving a can was not really an option the way the city presented it. Residents received notice that cans would be delivered unless they formally opted out of the program, but most residents in my neighborhood have reported that they did not even know about the program until the can was delivered. Others were angry about being limited to a 50-gallon garbage can in a neighborhood filled with trees. The cans fill up after one afternoon of yard work for most residents.

The high visibility of the problem is reminiscent of the last garbage strike in New York City over cuts to benefits and entitlements for union employees. It’s not much different in Sacramento, with the city allowing local union 39 – a particularly nasty, aggressive branch of the  AFL-CIO – to set the guidelines and dictate terms to the city. Sacramento’s city services have been diminishing, while the costs have continued to climb.

The unofficial “sickout” which the city is denying, is causing a great deal of anger, and not just because of the garbage backup – being held hostage by over-compensated city workers is at the root of the problem. While workers’ wages and benefits have exponentially grown over the last two decades, service has declined. Taxpayers have gotten the short end of the stick.

City residents may have tolerance for cuts to police, fire and teachers, but garbage backups are much too visible to ignore. Even in very liberal Sacramento, residents may finally have experienced too much push back from unions. We love volunteering for park maintenance days, but getting volunteers for garbage and yard debris pickups may be more difficult.

And yes, that’s a box on the pile with writing that says “6 weeks – no pickup.” It’s been there for a while.

MAY 6, 2011

No comments

Write a comment
  1. CalWatchdog
    CalWatchdog Author 6 May, 2011, 07:02

    As I finished writing this, a city recycling truck stopped in front of my house for an unusually long time – the driver was apparently trying to decide what to do with my can which had an empty box on the top with a big note on it reading “3 days – no pickup.” My husband and I watched as the driver sat there contemplating whether or not to make the pickup, or pass by. Apparently the empty box and note were too much for him, so he passed by our house, leaving us with a full recycling bin.

    So much for communicating… we sent a message to the city, and they sent one right back.

    – Katy Grimes

    Reply this comment
  2. John Seiler
    John Seiler 6 May, 2011, 07:55

    The illiterate truck driver must be a product of California’s government schools.

    Reply this comment
  3. CalWatchdog
    CalWatchdog Author 6 May, 2011, 08:04

    The story gets better –
    A friend wrote to the City’s Public Information Officer and asked, “Can you tell me what is the typical or average percentage of your drivers that are out ill or on restricted duty on an average workday? If you have a total of 119 drivers on staff and 12 are currently on vacation, that leaves 107 drivers not on vacation. Of those, 20 are either reporting ill or on restricted duty, leaving you with 87 drivers for 93 spots, or just 4 short of your required staffing of 93 drivers (or just over 4%). Can you help me understand why just a 4% shortfall in needed staffing would lead to two-day delays in picking up garbage, with those delays apparently falling disproportionately in Land Park and South Land Park (according to Ryan’s piece) and the Pocket Area, according to reports we have received?”

    Her answer – “We typically have 6 out sick. Today we had 7. There are 15 who are on modified duties and 12 on vacation. We have medical notes for the modified duty employees. You have already done the math. I can assure that there is no targeting of particular Neighborhoods, our crews are doing the best they can to get to everyone as quickly as possible. There will be some increased costs for collecting on Friday. I don’t have any figures on what those are and I am out of the office.”

    Here is what my friend added: “Also, can you tell me why the DOU has concluded that all of the drivers who have called in sick are out for legitimate medical reasons? I understand that Local 39 threw up a picket line on Tuesday night outside of City Hall to protest budget cuts and demanding that the city “Chop at the Top.” Are DOU solid waste drivers members of Local 39? If they are, do you think it is mere coincidence that you are experiencing a sudden spike in sick drivers contemporaneously with their union manning a picket line at City Hall protesting possible layoffs?”

    What a stupid game. Today’s drivers are being paid time-and-one-half.

    I agree that these workers must be the products of California’s public schools.

    Reply this comment
  4. larry 62
    larry 62 6 May, 2011, 09:39

    Katy, How much longer are the people of Sacramento going to put up with with this kind of nonsense?
    This is just like grade school behavior by the city and it’s spoiled brat employees. And I’m sure they call themselves professional sanitation engineers. From someone outside the city, it is beginning to sound like great entertainment.

    Reply this comment
  5. John Davey
    John Davey 9 May, 2011, 07:24

    Not one to foment confrontation, but it would be a shame if a match or two fell into those curb-side piles.

    And I’m old enough to remember burn cans in the back yard in Sacramento in the late 60s/early 70s. If the city cannot meet it’s responsibilities, then Citizens should be able to resolve the issue themselves. With some thick, viscous black smoke hovering over the city. “Green-Warriors” will wet themselves in despair.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Should U.C. be ‘independent’?

As I’ve noted in two recent posts, here and here, 50 years after the Berkeley Free Speech Movement, there’s no

CalWatchdog Morning Read – October 24

Clinton aides considered moving CA primary Senate leader asked Obama for help with 2015 enviro measure CA National Guard soldiers

Sacramento’s Delusions of Grandeur

Sacramento officials are still actively pursuing building a downtown sports arena and entertainment facility. Despite climbing unemployment in the region,