Education Reform Dies At Capitol

MAY 12, 2011

By KATY GRIMES

As teachers union activists descended upon the Capitol this week, it was clear that education reform was not foremost on the agenda. Instead, the priority was preserving union jobs.

Wednesday, as hundreds of teachers observed from the audience, two Republican bills centered around education reforms died in the Senate Education Committee.

SB 266, authored by Republican Sen. Bob Dutton of Cucamonga, would temporarily suspend the requirement that laid-off teachers who substitute for at least 21 days be compensated at their old rate of pay. The bill also would prohibit local educational agencies from creating vacancies and filling them with a substitute employee in order to save money.

The large Capitol hearing room was filled with teachers, unions representatives and activists opposed to Dutton’s bill, who cheered and jeered throughout the hearing. I’ve include a couple of pictures I took at the hearing.

Teachers said they were at the Capitol this week “rattling cages,” and trying to put pressure on Republican legislators to agree to support Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposal to extend taxes in order “to fully fund education.”

The California Teachers Association insisted that it was paying the hefty bill for the hundreds of substitute teachers needed in classrooms across the state.

But according to Lance Izumi, an education expert with the Pacific Research Institute (CalWatchdog’s parent think tank), teacher absenteeism has a significant negative impact on students. Yet, other than the financial consideration, no commentary was offered by the CTA about the absent teachers this week.

The CTA View

The CTA states that SB 266 “aims to reduce the pay of teachers who are laid-off and then recalled to serve as substitute teachers. Current law provides that after 20 days of substitute service, these laid-off teachers are to be paid at their scheduled salary.”

Teachers I spoke with said that Sen. Dutton’s bill would penalize experienced, veteran teachers, deprive students of experienced teachers and kill efforts to recruit quality or specialty-trained teachers.

But Dutton said that the requirement to pay laid-off teachers their old salary rate results in millions of dollars in higher costs for school districts, which is costing taxpayers too much for a state in a recession.

“The current system is fair. Our kids deserve better,” said Seth Bramble, a CTA lobbyist. “Teachers need resources to make sure children reach full potential.”

Lynn Fox with the California Federation of Teachers asked the committee “to look beyond the money savings and vote no. Students do not deserve a temporary workforce.”

Interestingly, representatives from the Los Angeles Unified School District and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office testified in support of Dutton’s bill.

But in addition to the long line of teachers and union activists testifying opposition, Sen. Juan Vargas, D-San Diego, really let Dutton have it. “You could fix the problem, senator. All you have to do is vote on a budget,” Vargas said. “The reason they are here” he said, gesturing to the audience, “is because we don’t have the guts to pass a budget.”

Vargas challenged Dutton to work on acquiring the two Republican votes needed in both the Senate and Assembly in order to pass Brown’s tax increase extensions.

“In March we did provide a path, which you rejected,” Dutton retorted. “It’s not Republicans at blame here.”

Vargas argued that teachers will receive pay cuts of up to one-third of their salaries for doing the same job if Republicans hold up Brown’s budget. But Dutton suggested that Vargas and Democrats stop

chasing jobs out of the state with anti-business policies.

Unexpected Revenue

Republican Sen. Sharon Runner of Lancaster thanked the teachers for attending the hearing, and told them about the

unexpected, additional $2.5 billion in revenue that the state discovered last week. “We want to see it go to education,” said Runner.

“We have done our bit, but we are back at ground zero with talk of pension reform,” said Democratic Sen.

Loni Hancock of Berkeley. “We need to be met halfway. We need only two Republican votes to maintain the extensions of taxes.”

Santa Clara Democratic Sen. Elaine Alquist named Proposition 13, the 1978 preperty tax reform ballot initiative, as a root cause of the education funding problem. Alquist called California’s ballot initiative system “the most dysfunctional initiative process in America.”

Much of the commentary from the committee sounded like campaign rhetoric and elicited loud cheers from the teachers union activists. However, once admonished by the Capitol Sergeants at Arms, the audience, instead of cheering vocally, would wave their arms like Charismatics at a church revival, a strange gesture now required in many schoolrooms.

SB 266 failed to pass the committee, but was allowed reconsideration for another time.

Performance Standards

The other controversial education bill presented to the education committee was SB 355, authored by Diamond Bar Republican Sen. Bob Huff, which authorizes school districts to use performance standards during a layoff period, instead of seniority.

Huff said that using the standard “last in, first out” measurement for layoffs punishes students and robs them of some very good younger teachers.

The bill is a tool designed to assist school districts and principals to get rid of the “duds,” explained Huff. “We have the ability to choose doctors and dentists, but our school kids are trapped — even one bad teacher in 12 years is a setback.”

Huff said that getting rid of a bad teacher costs between $300,000 and $3 million. Izumi said that the average cost to terminate a bad teacher is $400,000.

When Huff introduced former Democratic senators Richard Polanco and Gloria Romero as supporters of the bill, an audible hiss escaped from the audience.

“Education is supposed to be the great equalizer,” said Polanco, testifying in support of Huff’s bill. “But it disproportionately effects people of color.” Polanco described SB 355 as a modest measure designed to change the negative impacts brought about by bad teachers.

Izumi said the bill was considered “watered down” by some education reformers. But SB 355 still did not receive committee approval and failed to pass. Committee Democrats did not vote to pass or fail the bill. They sat on their hands while the vote was taken, and received much criticism from the teachers union activists present at the hearing.

Despite being asked numerous times at the hearing to give name and affiliation only when testifying in support of the bills, the hundreds of teachers at the hearing tried to give speeches, and had to be interrupted by committee chairman Sen. Alan Lowenthal for failing to follow directions.

Some teachers threatened to hold sit-ins inside of legislators’ offices, while others were more reserved and reasonable.

After the hearing and the failure of both Republican bills, one teacher-activist told a large Capitol lunchroom crowd made up of teachers that he just saw Mayor Villaraigosa exiting a Capitol elevator. “I asked him to pull the knife out of teachers’ backs,” he said to cheers.

No comments

Write a comment
  1. JoeS
    JoeS 12 May, 2011, 20:35

    If California would cut welfare and free stuff for illegals, we would have money for schools. There are no cuts to welfare but they are firing teachers.

    The state needs to cut ALL payrolls 5%

    Reply this comment
  2. Ka'iulani Z.
    Ka'iulani Z. 13 May, 2011, 22:36

    “Modern cynics and skeptics… see no harm in paying those to whom they entrust the minds of their children a smaller wage than is paid to those to whom they entrust the care of their plumbing.” John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States said this. I agree. These bills are not about making education better, they are about not funding education. There is a good system in place right now that allows a school district to fire ineffective teachers. SB355 is not about retaining the best teachers. Its about giving the school districts the right to fire the teachers with masters degrees that have worked more years in order to save money. It has nothing to do with giving the children a better education.

    Reply this comment
  3. Janice
    Janice 14 May, 2011, 09:28

    As a public school special educator I have and currently know of teachers who should be someplace (not in our schools) doing something else (not teaching) and yet, excellent, energized younger teachers are pink-slipped…the only thing CTA cares about is money…maximum amount of teachers=dues=political power.This is their only concern. That David Sanchez got himself arrested in Sacramento at the Capitol is reprehensible…he’s no martyr. He’s a fat cat union thug that just wants to make sure HIS standard of living is maintained. I have NO respect for the Union and what it has made of our public schools…the year I started teaching,1974 is when AFT and NEA started ‘duking it out’ to represent teachers…I can say with certainty our students are no better off, but we’ve managed to create a whole new ‘ruling class’ of education/union elite….and have done ZERO for maintaining the dignity and calling of the educational profession. Do I sound angry?…it’s because I am and I’m not alone. Many teachers feel cowed into supporting the union and they don’t agree with much of what they do(political) but feel they might be persecuted by their peers. To think, that’s what this noble profession has come to is heartbreaking.

    Reply this comment
  4. Seth
    Seth 16 May, 2011, 19:36

    Many of your facts are incorrect: especially your characterization of the behavior of the audience (there was absolutely no jeering and applause only one time… and once told of the rules, there was no applause). Your discussion of hissing, threats, and criticisms of lawmakers is total fabrication. The Sergeant-At-Arms taught the crowd sign langauge applause after the first occurance of clapping and teachers followed directions. Ask Senator Lowenthal, the Chair, if you doubt this. He thanked teachers for their demeanor in the hearing commenting specifically about how respectful to the process they were. Who writes this nonsense?

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Assemblywoman Grove raises union power issue

  Did a Democratic legislator take labor union money in exchange for a union-sponsored bill? That possibility was raised on

Pasadena struck with Bell-like scandal

  Pasadena has a reputation of being run by good-government liberals. But now it’s immersed in a scandal that could

Brown's Punch & Judy Budget Show

MARCH 30, 2011 By JOHN SEILER California’s budget comedy resembles an old Punch & Judy puppet show, with Gov. Jerry