Legislators' pure self interest

Steven Greenhut: Senate President Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, told a group of media gathered outside the Senate chambers that, yes, the state will have a budget by the deadline tomorrow. That possibility became more likely after the governor admitted that he is open to various budget gimmicks that he had previously insisted that he would not embrace. Not only does this reinforce that Brown is a phony, a non-reformer who serves mainly as the protector of the public-sector unions that elected him to office, but that legislators cannot possibly put the public interest above their own interest. The reason for my latter conclusion: Apparently, Prop. 25’s requirement that legislators permanently forfeit their own pay for the period between the budget deadline and the final passage of the budget.

I figured that element of Prop. 25 was a fake reform. The proposition was designed by liberals to make it easier for the state government to increase taxes. The “no pay for legislators” was a great item to throw in there as a way to gin up support among reform-minded voters. It made great fodder for TV ads. But I was apparently wrong. Legislators I talked to reminded me that about 80 percent of their colleagues are living paycheck to paycheck and are extremely worried about losing their main source of income. For most of these legislators, this is the best gig and the best pay they will ever get.

So we might get a deal because of it. Of course, it won’t be a good deal. We’re looking at more phony budgets and more “kick the can down the road” proposals. The bottom line is the state outspends its resources in good times and bad. The Democrats refuse to embrace reform. They refuse to consider outsourcing and pension changes. They will not take on the unions that run the state Capitol. And the Republicans generally aren’t that much better even if their rhetoric is sometimes convincing. However this plays out, there will be no real solution. Even if taxes are put to voters, the voters will say no.

California marches closer to the precipice.



No comments

Write a comment
  1. John Seiler
    John Seiler 14 June, 2011, 12:52

    Gimmicks are bad. But better than tax increases.

    Reply this comment
  2. Tylerle13
    Tylerle13 14 June, 2011, 14:18

    After what Brown said yesterday about angering environmentalists, I have a feeling he might be arranging a phony 1 year “Suspension” of AB32 in exchange for Republican votes. AB 32 has already been suspended by a judge until CARB can clean up their CEQA paperwork and do analysis of alternative options to Cap & Trade, so once again the Republicans will make a “Deal” that amounts to absolutly nothing. All the suspension will do is give CARB a chance to clean up their CEQA paperwork & appease the judge.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CalSTRS pension fix harder on taxpayers than UC fix

In the newly enacted 2015-16 state budget, the University of California has agreed to major pension changes, building on revisions

Six Californias?

Today entrepreneur Tim Draper is submitting signatures to put his Six Californias idea onto the 2016 ballot. That will give

Farm Bureau, PETA both oppose farm-confinement proposition

California voters’ support for farm animal rights was made clear in 2008 with the landslide victory of Proposition 2, which