CA Credit Rating Nothing to Celebrate

JAN. 17, 2012

They were slapping high fives in the offices of state Treasurer Bill Lockyer this week. Why the celebration?  Because California no longer has the nation’s worst credit rating, according to Moody’s Investors Service.

“The reason we’ve improved our standing,” said Tom Dresslar, spokesman for the treasurer’s office, “is because of the actions that the Legislature and the governor have taken last year, with regard to the budget.”

To wit, he elaborated, “They took some major steps to solving our structural deficit, and we started to pay down what the governor calls ‘the wall of debt.’ And those steps have not gone unnoticed by the rating agencies and they have given us credit for those actions.”

Well, not exactly Tom.

First of all, California really did not “improve” its standing. It simply moved from worst to next to worst because Moody’s downgraded Illinois (which, it should be noted, has a Democrat governor and Democrat-controlled state Legislature, just like California).

Also, neither Moody’s nor the other two major credit-rating agencies — Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Group –have really “given (California) credit” for the actions Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature took last year on the state budget. In fact, S&P and Fitch continue to rank California’s creditworthiness 50th among the states.

‘Missed Opportunity’

S&P said last summer that the budget the party of Brown enacted amounted to “a missed opportunity” because it failed to address the “backlog of budget obligation accumulated during the past decade.”

Fitch declared California’s fiscal and credit prospects “clouded,” not the least because of “extensive budgetary pressures confronting the state’s constrained financial flexibility stemming from voter initiatives.”

What particularly resonated was Fitch’s admonition that California’s credit rating should not be so low “considering the size and breadth of the state’s economy and tax base” as well as “the strength inherent in a state’s sovereign powers.”

Indeed, California continues to boast one of the world’s 10 largest economies. The state government collects $90 billion or so in annual revenues. If the budget-making process in Sacramento hadn’t long been so dysfunctional, the state would not now be struggling with its structural deficit. It would not have the nation’s worst credit rating.

Dresslar estimated that the state’s structural deficit is $9.2 billion. He also maintained that Gov. Brown’s proposed 2012-2013 budget will eliminate that structural deficit and, in turn, move the Golden State up a tier or more in the credit ratings.


But the governor’s budget relies on the same kind of fiscal trickeration that produced the backlog of budget obligations to which S&P referred. Most noteworthy, he includes $6.9 billion worth of tax hikes in his budget that require the unlikely approval of California voters.

Without those tax hikes, the governor’s budget falls apart, as a new report this week by the state Legislative Analyst’s office attests. And once that happens, we’ll see the same excruciating fight in Sacramento over taxes and spending that we’ve witnessed for far too many years.

Some say that California’s perennial budget problems are unsolvable. But that is not so. All lawmakers need do is study the best practices of the states that the credit rating agencies rank in their top ten.

Aside from their enviable creditworthiness, those states have four things in common:

They control their spending, not letting yearly outlays outpace inflation and population growth. They do not create (or expand) state programs anticipating new revenues that may not materialize.

They prepare for lean economic times by setting aside windfall tax revenues during economic boom times. And they keep their tax burdens among the lowest in the country, recognizing that lower taxes lead to greater economic growth and more overall tax revenue flowing into state coffers.

– Joseph Perkins










No comments

Write a comment
  1. Tom Dresslar
    Tom Dresslar 18 January, 2012, 09:54

    Mr. Perkins,

    This column, or whatever it is, is a hot airbag full of errors and distortions. The audience for this piece of … journalism probably equals the square root of four. But just in case it’s larger, let’s set the record straight.

    First, my name is spelled Dresslar, not Dressler.

    Second, you took the quote completely out of context. As reported in more professional quarters, I actually acknowledged the other 2 major rating agencies still ranked California dead last. I said that going to No. 49 in one agency’s eyes because it lowered Illinois’ rating was not cause throw confetti from the rooftops. Your statement that we were doing high-fives here at the State Treasurer’s Office is a complete crock.

    Third, California’s credit standing in the market did improve last year. Our cash-flow borrowing notes received higher ratings. All 3 major rating agencies credited the Legislature and Governor with producing a budget that moved toward eliminating the structural deficit, and minimized use of gimmicks and one-time solutions. In the market, California bonds have outperformed municipal bond indexes and U.S. Treasuries.

    Finally, you say the Governor’s budget will fall apart if voters reject the proposed tax increases. You cite this as evidence the budget relies on trickery. You’re dead wrong. The budget includes spending reductions that would be triggered if the tax increases fail at the ballot. That means the budget would stay balanced even if voters disagree with the Governor. Standard & Poor’s said the Governor’s plan relies even less than last year’s budget on one-time solutions, and that it carries less legal risks.

    Have a nice day.

    Tom Dresslar
    Communications Director
    California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer

    Editor’s note: Mr. Dresslar’s name has been corrected in the text. We regret the error. Mr. Perkins responds, below, to the other points Mr. Dresslar brings up.

    Reply this comment
  2. CalWatchdog
    CalWatchdog 18 January, 2012, 13:53

    I’m actually flattered that Mr. Dresslar took the time to comment. Let me address his criticisms:

    First, he is absolutely correct that I misspelled his last name. For that I owe him an apology.

    Second, his quote appeared in articles reporting that California no longer had the nation’s worst credit rating. He said, “we’ve improved our standing” and cited several reasons why that was so. To the casual reader, Dresslar’s remark suggests a cause and effect: That the governor and Legislature took decisive action on the budget and, as a result, California no longer has the nation’s worst credit. I found his quote misleading.

    Third, the article is about California’s overall credit rating, as reported in the news last week. He refers to “credit standing” to confuse the issue, to make the case that California’s credit is improving.

    Finally, Dresslar says that the governor’s proposed budget will trigger spending cuts if his proposed tax hikes are rejected by the voters. Those cuts would amount to $5.4 billion, while the Brown budget projects $6.9 in new tax revenue if his proposed tax hikes are approved. That leaves a $1.5 billion budget gap if, as expected, the voters reject Brown’s tax hike. Not a balanced budget.

    I actually sympathize with Lockyer’s Communications Director. When the story broke last week about California’s credit rating moving from worst in the nation (according to Moody’s) to next to worst, he had to put the best possible spin on it.

    Like putting lipstick on a pig.

    — Joseph Perkins

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CBP report shows weak jobs growth during recovery

In a new report, “Uneven Progress: What Economic Recovery Has Meant for California’s Workers,” the California Budget Project analyzed how

Forecast: CA Economic Lull to Continue

DEC. 8, 2010 By JOHN SEILER When Gov. Jerry Brown takes office in less than a month and deals with

California Jobs Gap Grows

Jan. 25, 2010 By JOHN SEILER In an earlier article I introduced a new measure of economic vitality: the Jobs