Skelton Right on Initiative Reform

John Seiler:

I was so shocked this morning when I saw George Skelton’s column that I had to read it twice. I actually agreed with him.

He’s calling for reform of the state’s broken initiative process. He bashes Attorney General Kamala Harris for her ultra-biased title and summary for a pension-reform initiative. Skelton made the same arguments as my colleague Steven Greenhut did here on CalWatchDog.com. Greenhut called it “totalitarianism.”

Here’s Skelton: “In her title and summary of a conservative pension proposal, Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris somehow felt it necessary to define public employees for voters. They include ‘teachers, nurses and peace officers,’ she noted. You know, all the admired people — the ones with their faces in the anti-pension-reform TV ads. No mention of parking meter readers or tax collectors.

“She also claimed the proposal ‘reduces pension benefits for current and future public employees,’ ‘eliminates constitutional protections for current and future public employees’ vested pension benefits’ and ‘prohibits public retirement systems from providing death or disability benefits to future employees.’

“Nonsense.”

Skelton points out that a previous reform gave the writing of the title and summary to the attorney general. I would add that people should have seen that was an obvious mistake because the AG’s main job is running for governor. Harris obviously is. The previous AG was Gov. Jerry Brown. And before him, Bill Lockyer thought about running for governor, but didn’t; and Dan Lungren ran, but lost. Also, during World War II, AG Earl Warren put loyal Japanese-Americans into concentration camps to increase his popularity, which plopped him in the governor’s chair.

Skelton proposes shifting the writing of the title and summary to the non-partisan Legislative Analyst’s Office, which already produces the initiatives’ ballot analyses that nobody reads. That might be an improvement. It also might lead to the politicization of an office that so far has remained mostly, and surprisingly, non-partisan.

My suggestion: Farm out the writing of the title and summary to Switzerland. They do democracy better over there and have national initiatives. Then again, it would end up wrecking one of the last remaining free countries on earth. Everything the Golden State touches turns to pyrite.

Feb. 16, 2012

 

No comments

Write a comment
  1. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 17 February, 2012, 14:19

    The initiative process in CA is full of subterfuge, as it is. Remember the lottery initiative. Do you think it would have passed, if the title had included the information, “One-percent of all lottery proceeds will go toward funding education”. Its about time that initiative titles spelled out, just what is involved, if they are passed, because most, of the voters, will not take the time, to study the information provided, in the ballot pamphlets. The AG made a partisan decision–what else would you expect her to do. Do you really think that Cooley would have made a non-partisan decision, if he were titleing, those draconian initiatives. Why should the rhetoric describing initiatives, be any less-partisan, than everything else, in politics. I think the initiative process should be scrapped, altogether–perhaps a citizen’s commission that talks with the voters and takes the information to the legislature, so it can do its job. If you want things done, according to your Libertarian views, then you need to elect Libertarians. Once people are elected to official positions, they should be respected, whatever your own personal thoughts about them, are.

    Reply this comment
  2. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 18 February, 2012, 23:04

    You still haven’t shown us anything in the title and summary provided by the AG that is not contained in the proposed initiatives or otherwise incorrect.

    I understand the current meme that it it the AG’s fault nobody wanted to provided financial support for these pension reform efforts, but the facts just don’t support such a conclusion.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Another top San Francisco official under fire

It’s not just San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and Police Chief Greg Suhr facing sharp criticism. Now another top city

CSU ‘student success fees’ an obnoxious surcharge

California lawmakers of both parties have long been upset that UC and CSU leaders look to raise tuition as option

No ‘time out’ for city in rail authority’s cross-hairs

Dec. 21, 2012 By Chris Reed The nervousness is growing in Bakersfield as the California High-Speed Rail Authority moves toward