Will Calif. end double taxation of businesses?

April 10, 2012

By Katy Grimes

For more than 100 years, California was known as a great manufacturing state. It could be again if a new bill passes.

For decades, businesses clamored to come to the Golden State, and entrepreneurs armed only with a great idea built fabulous businesses.

But the last decade in California has seen manufacturing disappear faster than the Cuckoo bird.

“A robust manufacturing industry is an indicator of a nation’s ability to foster innovation and drive broad, sustained economic growth, and no state has been more important to U.S. manufacturing competitiveness than California,” the Milken Institute wrote in 2002.

From 1997-2000, California had 5.6 percent of all manufacturing investments in the country. By 2001, it dropped to 1.9 percent, when a sales tax on equipment became a barrier to new investment.

Through increasingly invasive and expensive taxes, California politicians have killed off the taxpaying goose that laid the golden egg, leaving very little manufacturing left in the state.

What Is Killing Off California Business?

Increasing costly regulations and hefty business-killing taxes have caused many businesses with little or no profits to close, or move to other states.

For many years, California has been double-taxing manufacturers through a sales and use tax on equipment. Any time a business purchases equipment in California, the equipment seller must collect the sales tax, paid by the purchaser.

However, Assemblywoman Alyson Huber, D-El Dorado Hills, has introduced AB 1972, which seeks to provide a tax exemption to businesses for the purchase of manufacturing equipment, or for research and development. Tax consideration such as this goes a long way toward stimulating business investment, resulting in job creation.

“California has struggled to attract or retain jobs in the manufacturing sector as many of the state’s manufacturers have struggled to keep their doors open here,” an analysis of AB 1972 found. “From 2001 to 2011, California has lost 613,000 jobs in this sector according to EDD statistics cited by the California Manufactures and Technology Association.”

There is no doubt that California’s tax and regulatory climate is a direct contributor to these job losses. According to the Milken Institute Report, Manufacturing 2.0, the key reasons for the state’s loss in manufacturing jobs are the harsh regulatory climate, tax burden and business-unfriendly reputation. This report compares California to seven states — Arizona, Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota, Oregon, Texas and Washington — that saw an increase in their share of the nation’s manufacturing jobs.

During a Revenue and Taxation hearing Monday, Huber said that other states recognize that taxing the input as well as the final manufactured product is double taxation and discourages investment. But double taxation does even more than just discourage investment—it prevents manufacturing businesses from making necessary investments back into equipment so they may stay competitive and grow. Double taxation also renders California businesses unable to compete with even our closest states, which do not tax business equipment purchases.

The current policy has resulted in less production in California. Out-of-state companies elect to grow elsewhere and in-state companies continue to shift workers or facilities to other regions that do not burden capital investments with excess taxation.

Huber also warned that, with AB 32, California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, currently being implemented, businesses will be required to purchase new equipment and make expensive retrofits.

On The Endangered Species List

The Milken Institute recommended:

• Streamlining the regulatory procedure for manufacturers, increasing transparency and accountability in the regulatory process and encouraging long-term investment through new policy tools—all of which can be achieved without relaxing or changing a single regulatory standard.

• Enhancing public incentives for manufacturers through better planning, coordination across government agencies and partnering with the private sector.

• Launching an industry-led campaign to encourage Californians to pursue careers in manufacturing, highlighting the attributes of modern manufacturing, its importance to the economy, its record of environmental stewardship and its high wages.

• Creating a network of education, training, research, and business incubation centers around the state to develop a highly qualified manufacturing work force, to invent and commercialize advanced manufacturing techniques, and to assist start-up businesses.

• Creating a public-private initiative to conduct research, develop new technologies and processes, and commercialize more efficient and environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices with incentives to facilitate adoption of new standards.

However, there is one outstanding flaw in the bill’s analysis: “Any sales and use tax paid by a business will, however, be factored into the price it charges for goods, which in turn, may be subject to taxation.” This is an assumption regularly used at the Capitol by people unfamiliar with business. Businesses can only charge what the market will bear, including equipment manufacturers. Sometimes added costs can be passed on, but many times they cannot. It isn’t always the end consumer/purchaser who picks up the increase.

With California continually adding taxes onto the backs of businesses, the very reason so many are leaving and closing up for good is because so many of the state’s costs cannot be passed along. Double taxation renders California businesses uncompetitive.

Huber said that while initially this tax exemption will decrease state revenues, it has been proved time and time again that within a few years the state not only recovers the revenue, revenues increase. Once manufacturers have had the time to reinvest in new equipment and the new jobs which come from equipment purchases, California’s economy may have a chance. But this bill needs to be passed first.

10 comments

Write a comment
  1. Gino DiCaro
    Gino DiCaro 10 April, 2012, 11:27

    Excellent piece, Katy! With $71k average wages, the highest economic multiplier among all industries, and tremendous upward mobility for California’s working families, we must find ways to motivate new manufacturing investment. CA is one of only three states that tax the purchase of manufacturing equipment and investments. California state revenues will improve with very simple and common solutions to grow the manufacturing sector.

    Reply this comment
  2. Beelzebub
    Beelzebub 10 April, 2012, 13:03

    “As state leaders hope for a surprise uptick in revenues this spring, state Controller John Chiang reported Tuesday that California lagged last month by $233.5 million, or 4.2 percent”

    http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/04/california-revenues-42-percent-shy-in-march.html

    Another big swing and a miss by Jerry Clown!

    How’s that responsible budget forecast for 2011-12 working out, Jerry?

    Next time try understating revenue and overstating expenses for once!!! 🙂

    Reply this comment
  3. queeg
    queeg 10 April, 2012, 15:37

    Check out mega warehouse development aling Route #15 in Riverside County etc.

    Manufacturing is a dead language word…..

    Reply this comment
  4. NTHEOC
    NTHEOC 10 April, 2012, 18:12

    California is not broke!!Contrary to what some in positions of temporary power would like you to believe, California is not brokeat all people.The Golden State is so rich that it’s drunk on its own wealth and power.I recently read an article that one out of every five billionaires in America,live right here in california,HAH!!! Where’s your share of this massive wealth? Has it been transferred from workers and consumers to bankers and billionaires? Oh yes it has!The total net worth of the billionaires in California is $231.8 billion!! Ten percent of that wipes out the budget deficit. And that doesn’t even count the folks worth $900 million or less; they didn’t make the list. A very modest tax increase on a very tiny number of people could solve our budget problems not just today but into the foreseeable future. There is a reason why the gap is widening between the corporate fat pigs and everyday people!

    Reply this comment
  5. Rex The Wonder Dog!
    Rex The Wonder Dog! 10 April, 2012, 22:04

    A very modest tax increase on a very tiny number of people could solve our budget problems not just today but into the foreseeable future.

    $300 million is not a “modest tax increase” unless you’re a public employee milking the system.

    I also don’t think it would solve anything for more than 12 months, the pols always give away the farm to the public unions when they have $$$$.

    Reply this comment
  6. Rex The Wonder Dog!
    Rex The Wonder Dog! 10 April, 2012, 22:04

    There is a reason why the gap is widening between the public employee fat pigs and everyday people!

    🙂 Fixed

    Reply this comment
  7. queeg
    queeg 10 April, 2012, 22:53

    Brown sees the end times….prophetic….follow him….he knows best…..believe….

    Reply this comment
  8. Tom in SoCal
    Tom in SoCal 11 April, 2012, 08:22

    Good article. However it is not only sales tax on capital expenses that hinders businesses. It is also corporate taxes and especially workers’ comp insurance rates. Also don’t forget the crazy environmental rules the state has imposed, both thru AB32 and the Air Resources Board.

    Without those being fixed you will get nowhere with encouraging manufacturers to stay.

    Reply this comment
  9. CalWatchdog
    CalWatchdog Author 11 April, 2012, 09:37

    Tom – you are right. As a former business owner forced out of business by bankrupt clients as well as California’s staggering regulations and high taxes, I am too familiar with the enviro regs, double taxation, tax on personal property and equipment, taxes on top of high utility rates, the aggressive BOE always looking to redefine what falls under the sales and use tax, maniacal Franchise Tax Board and IRS auditors, and hundreds of thousands of dollars spent annually on Workers Compensation insurance, when we already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on a great health insurance plan.

    And no one talks about the mandatory insurance policies banks impose when borrowing to purchase equipment, or maintain a line of credit. This is why new businesses are not being created in California, and existing businesses are fleeing, stagnant or closing.

    Katy Grimes

    Reply this comment
  10. queeg
    queeg 11 April, 2012, 11:36

    Right on Kathy…I got to the point as a property management company owner….could not comply and be economically viable….my fixed and semi-fixed costs became huge…strategic turned to defensive….regulations dealing with lead paint, WC and liability and errors and omissions insurance costs, being bare on a myrid of enviro risks, state contractor law, city planning red tape, frivilious law suits, lack of police cooperation dealing with drugs, gangs and domestic abuse…..tedium dealing with landlord/tenant law, consumer credit regulations and bogus fair housing scams….

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Legislator warns against lawsuit abuse

When California’s Republican legislators warn that high taxes, onerous regulations and frivolous lawsuits are driving businesses out of California, they

Hypocrite Cameron Disses California

John Seiler: James Cameron is another filthy-rich elitist — like Der Arnold, Bill Gates and Meg Whitman — who loves

Video: Gun control kills

Sept. 21, 2012 By John Seiler California’s gun control fanatics took a rest this year because of the election. Gun