A welcome bow to telecom deregulation

April 20, 2012

By Joseph Perkins

The California Public Utilities Commission is displeased. In a meeting April 17 in San Francisco, four of its five members sharply criticized a state Senate bill which, they claimed, would strip the commission of its power to regulate basic phone service.

What surprises is that the measure, SB 1161, was introduced not by a free-market Republican but by Los Angeles Democrat Alex Padilla, chairman of the Senate Energy, Utilities and Telecommunications Committee.

Padilla’s bill would prohibit the PUC from regulating Internet-based phone service, known as Voice over Internet Protocol. It passed his committee this week by an 11-0 vote, a rare instance in the state capital in which legislation has garnered unanimous support on both sides of the aisle.

PUC Commissioner Michael Florio insisted yesterday that SB 1161 is unnecessary, that he and his colleagues have exercised a “light touch” in regulating VoIP. “Nobody is talking about regulating the Internet,” he said. “It’s just a political slogan that has no basis in reality.”

Well, the PUC has restrained itself — so far — from heavy-handed regulation of VoIP. But that hardly means the commission will maintain such a light touch going forward, as consumers increasingly rely on VoIP to make and receive phone calls.

Indeed, VoIP is a “disruptive” technology. It uses high-speed broadband Internet service to connect callers at minimal cost, while also offered advanced features — think Skype — unavailable on standard phone systems.

Currently, nearly one in three residential phone subscribers relies on VoIP connections. At the rate VoIP usage is growing, it will not be very long before old-school copper-wire land lines are rendered obsolete.

Special interests

That concerns special interest groups that want the PUC to regulate the growing Internet-based voice industry; that are peeved at Padilla and his Senate colleagues for its preemptive strike against Florio and his fellow regulators.

“SB 1161 is a wolf in sheep’s clothing,” said Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform Network, an activist consumer group. It not only would prevent the regulation of VoIP, he warned, but also “would mean the end of regulatory oversight over large monopoly phone companies.”

Toney’s alarmist pronouncement was echoed by Val Afarasiev, a spokeswoman for the Communications Workers of America. She predicted that avaricious phone companies “are going to inform the consumers of California that no longer will they provide touch-tone type of wire-line services because they are going to move to VoIP services.”

These are the same old arguments that previously have been made mustered against the deregulation of telecommunications; the same dire warnings that have previously proven unfounded.

In fact, deregulation of the phone business has been a tremendous boon to consumers. Competition among various service providers — including traditional providers of land lines, cable companies, wireless companies and VoIP companies — has meant lower-cost local and long-distance calling.

Padilla deserves much credit for defying the PUC; for ignoring TURN, CWA and other knee-jerk opponents of telecom deregulation. Yes, passage of SB 1161 will indeed benefit California phone companies. But it will much more benefit California businesses and residents.

No comments

Write a comment
No Comments Yet! You can start the discussion, add a comment to this post.

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Does Prison Decision Violate States' Rights?

MAY 25, 2011 By JOHN SEILER Tuesday’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, effectively putting the federal courts in charge

Brown’s Delta tunnel project draws strong opposition

To his cherished high-speed rail project, Gov. Jerry Brown can now add his ambitious Delta tunnel project to the list of

Proposition 16 Hidden Intent?

Could there be a hidden intent behind the PG&E sponsored Proposition 16? Peter Darbee, chairman and CEO of PG&E, is