Parcel tax push: School finance debate must not ignore scandals

Jan. 17, 2013

By Chris Reed

If we are going to have a debate about school finances in California because of the Legislature’s interest in making it easier for school districts to get parcel taxes approved to boost their budgets, let’s have a serious debate. A serious debate would focus on three related school finance scandals.

1) The unconstitutional practice of school districts asking parents to pay for basic educational resources.

2) The insane but apparently legal practice of school districts using 30-year borrowing to pay for shortlived electronics like laptops and for the most routine maintenance, including graffiti removal.

3) The ridiculous practice of school districts using capital appreciation bonds — which districts often don’t start paying back for decades and which can’t be refinanced. The result is bonds that can cost 10 times or more the original sum being borrowed.

How are they interrelated? Because they are all driven by standard teacher compensation practices in which most teachers get automatic raises for 15 of their first 20 years on the job and get additional raises just for taking graduate courses of any kind — not even in their teaching field.

This has led to employee compensation consuming 90 percent or more of the budget in many school districts — and to desperate attempts to find money to cover teacher pay such as 1, 2 and 3.

Isn’t this, yunno, news — this phenomenon? Not to the Sacramento media, which has covered the third scandal but never placed it in the larger context of why school finances are so stressed.

The key to understanding Sacramento is that goal no. 1 of the CTA and the CFT is preserving and funding those automatic raises, and the unions are the most powerful force in Sacramento. It would be nice if George Skelton ever mentioned this, don’t you think? But don’t hold your breath.




1 comment

Write a comment
  1. Hondo
    Hondo 17 January, 2013, 12:51

    I say, shut down the campuses, go to Khan and just take the tests to graduate. Everything free but for the few classes that need labs. Save billions on pensions and labor costs, just fire all the teachers and hire test administrators. Free text books online and save the trees. No more going to the free kill zones that are public schools. Save the planet because we don’t drive cars or take the buses to school and spend fossil fuels to heat and cool all the classes. Less traffic jams and accidents and traffic deaths.
    I’m sure a focus on online schooling at home for whatever can be put online will balance the budget easily. Even paying for free internet access will be a bargin.
    Someone tell me whats wrong with this picture.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

CA Medical Board in new flap over painkillers

The Medical Board of California, which licenses physicians and responds to complaints about incompetence or misconduct, suffered an extraordinary rebuke

A helmet law for bicyclers?

No question wearing a helmet makes bicycle riding safer, much as for motorcycles. But how much of a Nanny State

Lockyer, Levy Are Clueless

Steven Greenhut: It’s shocking for the state’s highest-ranking finance officer to express such ill-informed views on economic competitiveness in California