IRS: the heart of big government

IRS Frankenstein,Cagle, May 23, 2013May 27, 2013

By Steven Greenhut

It’s hard to believe, but the current tax scandal will eventually fade away just as all Washington, D.C. scandals run their course. It’s easier to believe that the IRS will remain a loathsome and abusive agency, subject perhaps to some reforms and personnel changes that ultimately will do nothing to change its character.

This has been a good teachable moment for Americans about the nature of the federal Leviathan, but few people will glean the most important lesson: Both parties need a powerful tax agency to collect the funds that support the programs they, and the constituencies they represent, favor.

And boy do they favor programs. Despite the partisan rancor and the pretense of “big debates” about the size of government, the Democrats and Republicans have no interest in trimming, let alone slashing, anything of substance. Democratic leaders are particularly infuriating as they blame any tragedy on sequester “cuts,” but Republicans are no more given to trimming entitlement programs — plus they still want the defense budget to grow.

Conservative think tanks even echo the tactics of liberals by complaining that modest cuts in the military budget amount to an assault on our nation’s ability to protect itself. As the Heritage Foundation opined, “President Obama’s overall budget request for fiscal year (FY) 2014 and beyond is all but certain to result in the continued application of sequestration to the defense account, which will lead to defense spending levels that are too low to permit the military to protect U.S. vital national interests.”

This weekend, newspaper readers will find the usual, touching commentary calling on Americans to spend some time during the three-day holiday remembering the sacrifice made by Americans who died while serving in the military. That’s an honorable idea, but I’d suggest we get past the “freedom isn’t free” clichés and ask a more pointed question few on the right or left want to answer: Has our continued exertion of military might made us a safer, better and freer nation?

Not shocked

Americans shouldn’t be shocked to find that our government relies on a muscular and fearsome tax-collection agency to fund our massive welfare state. And they shouldn’t be shocked that our nation, which has a defense budget higher than the combined defense budgets of the next 10 highest-spending nations, projects its military power in ways that have more to do with realpolitik than with protecting “freedom.”

Even the military is dispensing with arcane talk about protecting freedom. I recently spotted billboard ads from the U.S. Navy, which proclaimed: “A Global Force for Good.” I perused the Navy’s Web page dedicated to the ad campaign, and there wasn’t a word on it about protecting freedom. I found the lingo a little creepy: “The strength and status of any nation can be measured in part by the will and might of its navy. … As the largest, most versatile, most capable naval force on the planet today, America’s Navy epitomizes this idea.”

A few years ago, the Associated Press’ Robert Fisk reported on the U.S. Army’s rewriting of the “Soldier’s Creed.” It had long been a simple ethical statement in which soldiers vowed to protect our nation, live up to the highest ideals, and not disgrace the uniform. The Army rewrote it into a creed of the “warrior,” in which America’s soldiers vowed to “never accept defeat” as they destroy the nation’s enemies.

I don’t always agree with Fisk’s politics, but he was dead-on in complaining about a subtle shift in America from honoring our military and its necessary role to a more Sparta-like embrace of militarism.

Our freedoms

In December, my wife and I visited Central America, which brought back memories of decades-old foreign policy debates that helped mold my political worldview. We flew into Liberia, Costa Rica’s modern Daniel Oduber Quiros airport — jokingly referred to as Oliver North International because it was built on the site of the military airstrip used to send aid up the Pacific coast to supply the anti-communist Nicaraguan Contras.

I remember cheering the vote in 1984 that approved aid to the Contras. As a young conservative, I was eager to see the United States project its military might in a way that was designed to roll back rather than simply come to terms with the freedom-sapping and expansive Soviet empire. But one of the most memorable sights as we drove through the impoverished Nicaraguan countryside last year was the huge posters of El Presidente Daniel Ortega that welcomed visitors into every city. North’s Cold War nemesis remains the president of the country.

This reminded me of the insight that, ultimately, America can only be the guardian of its own freedoms. Unfortunately, we haven’t been doing so well on that score in the ensuing years.

The Soviet Union’s collapse was a godsend, but it’s hard to argue that America has become a freer nation since the Cold War ended. The so-called peace dividend has turned into a down-payment on other wars, on maintaining the infrastructure of troops, bases and weaponry that sustains our nation’s role as the world’s most effective “global force for good,” as the Navy’s ad folks put it.

The best way to honor the sacrifices of those who perished in the nation’s wars is to look at ways to limit unnecessary American military endeavors in the future. Right now, I’m guessing that will happen around the time that Congress decides to disband the IRS. 

Steven Greenhut is vice president of journalism at the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity.


Write a comment
  1. Queeg
    Queeg 27 May, 2013, 07:11

    The stealth drones’ ETA…..four minutes!

    Reply this comment
  2. The Ted Recondo Lerp
    The Ted Recondo Lerp 27 May, 2013, 16:32

    I resent these implications. In a land that regards free speech as a treasure…we honor Queeg.

    Reply this comment
  3. Ted Troll Slayer
    Ted Troll Slayer 27 May, 2013, 19:23

    Bobo…. Can you give me some specifics?

    Reply this comment
  4. Donkey
    Donkey 27 May, 2013, 20:14

    BobA, I have seen the police and fire RAGWUS feeders of HB fill the council chambers when their contracts are being negotiated …to steal all they can from city taxpayers. 🙂

    Reply this comment
    NTHEOC 27 May, 2013, 21:12

    Donkey says,
    BobA, I have seen the police and fire RAGWUS feeders of HB fill the council chambers when their contracts are being negotiated …to steal all they can from city taxpayers.
    The only time you see them fill the council chambers is when there is a potential cut to public safety that would be a danger to the citizens! ….But the fine citizens of HB also fill the chambers and support their public employee’s. like voting multiple times to keep the property pension tax!!!!! You know donk,the one YOU pay,lol.

    Reply this comment
  6. jimmydeeoc
    jimmydeeoc 27 May, 2013, 23:59

    “a potential cut to public safety that would be a danger to the citizens!”

    Spoken like a true feeder.

    I live in Irvine, and you could cut the number of coppers in half w/o so much as a dent in the crime rate. Why? The residents don’t cause much crime in the first place…..mostly families, educated, with higher incomes, that sort of thing. Argue all you want, but there’s no denying demographics and socio-economics. You might as well tell the tides to stop rising.

    But they have been brainwashed by the feeders and their enablers to think that it’s only the boys in blue that separate them from being Stabba Ana.

    Reply this comment
  7. BobA
    BobA 28 May, 2013, 08:11

    The only viable solution to the politicization of the IRS is to get rid of it and move to a flat tax.

    The only legitimate and worthwhile tax-exempt organizations are the Red Cross and the Salvation Army. Their mission(s)is totally apolitical and thus deserving of tax-exempt status.

    Reply this comment
  8. Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do!
    Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do! 28 May, 2013, 08:49

    LOL Bo-bo— Don’t you think the Tea Pary Express should be 501 c 3?


    Reply this comment
  9. Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do!
    Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do! 28 May, 2013, 13:45

    my “inability to read”? Huh?

    Give me an example.

    Reply this comment
  10. Bunker Queen
    Bunker Queen 28 May, 2013, 14:33

    my “inability to read”? Huh?

    Give me an example.

    Uh oh….looks like the TEdsz been complaining to the proprietors again……posts going missing!

    Tell you what Tedzs instead of going behind my back….why don’t you just “tap out” publically here and I promise to leave you alone!

    Reply this comment
  11. Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do!
    Steele, Ted, When only the very best will do! 28 May, 2013, 15:31

    Queen of the Bunker

    I have never snitched you off to the adults here. Never little buddy.

    Don’t flatter yourself. Your posts go missing on their own because they are often childish, frustrated and inapropriate. I do notice though that when the jefes delete your drivel that they at least have the courtesy to advise you specifically why. My guess is that you don’t coach up all that well.

    …and so it goes…

    Reply this comment
  12. Bunker Queen
    Bunker Queen 29 May, 2013, 08:53

    Banned! I win TEDZ!

    Reply this comment
  13. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 30 May, 2013, 19:19

    Teddy the Queen Carp is just too into himself……

    Reply this comment
  14. The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm)
    The Modified Ted Steele Methodologies (tm) 31 May, 2013, 06:57

    I think you’re right Mr. U, or maybe…..he has packed and shipped???

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
ContrasIRSPresident ObamaSteven GreenhutTaxes

Related Articles

AB 917 would send charter schools to the back of the class

The popularity and success of California’s 900 charter schools aren’t making everyone happy. Union leaders have tried to organize the

CARB's leadership fetish

JUNE 3, 2010 The word is “leadership.” These days, it’s hard to find a news article or press release about

Ban makes shopping annoying

AUGUST 9, 2010 While walking though the supermarket the other day, my wife and I began playing a game I