Tesla gets first taste of tax break

Tesla gets first taste of tax break

Tesla Model S wikimediaLast week, the state of California gave Palo Alto-based electric vehicle maker Tesla a tax break valued at more than $30 million. SF Gate first reported the news.

Ostensibly, the tax break will help the automaker build more cars and help create jobs in California. Business groups (that like tax breaks) and environmentalists (who like electric cars) have both praised the move. But a larger question remains, and it’s about the tax that Tesla was able to avoid.

California is one of the few states that enforces a tax on the purchase of manufacturing equipment. While most taxes affect companies’ abilities to expand and grow, few do so as directly as the manufacturing equipment tax does.

Whenever a company wants to expand its manufacturing operations, it has to automatically add a 4.1875 percent tax to the cost of equipment. In the case of Tesla, the company was more easily able to afford purchasing hundreds of millions of dollars in new equipment because it got a $34.7 million tax break.

The manufacturing tax has had demonstrably negative effects on California’s economy. After massive shrinkage during the recession, manufacturing began to regrow as an industry. Nationally, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of manufacturing jobs has increased 4.59 percent since bottoming out in 2010. But in California, that number is around half a percent. Many pointed to the manufacturing equipment tax as a reason for that anemic rebound.

Californians may be used to hearing stories like this without any action to resolve the problem. But Assembly Bill 93 —which passed both houses of the state Legislature in June — created tax exemptions for many businesses beginning in July 2014. The bill’s sponsor was the Assembly Budget Committee.

Although the legislation included tax exemptions, it also included changes to various economic development areas in the state. This led most Republicans to reject the bill. Republicans also pointed out that AB93 was presented to them “only hours before a hearing,” according to the Sacramento Bee.

“It is the intent of the Legislature to exempt manufacturing equipment from state sales and use taxes in order to make California more competitive in attracting new businesses to the state,” the bill reads, continuing, “and to bring California in line with the 48 other states that exempt manufacturing equipment from sales and use tax.”

Application

So how can a business apply for this manufacturing tax exemption? The business simply needs to belong to someone engaging in manufacturing or research and development in biotech, engineering and biological or physical sciences. And companies can qualify for up to $200 million in exemptions for machinery and equipment, the equipment used to operate that machinery or equipment, and special purpose buildings needed for manufacturing.

And, according to the state, the property must be used for “manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling of tangible personal property,” or research and development.

Dorothy Rothrock of the California Manufacturers and Technology Association told Bloomberg Businessweek the law “should help California be a little more nimble and responsive when companies come and say: ‘Hey, we’d be here except for this problem or that problem.’”

She added, “It’s not a bad idea for state leaders to have some flexibility to make a deal with people.”

7 comments

Write a comment
  1. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 28 December, 2013, 12:27

    America, giving out $30 million tax breaks to billionaires! Gotta love it.

    How did that work out for Fisker Automotive and Solyndra????

    Gov has NO business giving out free money to favored campaign contributors.

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 28 December, 2013, 12:29

    Fisker= $139 million lost.

    Solyndra= $531 million lost.

    Is it any wonder our CA state gov is in the hole $500 billion and the federal gov $18 trillion?

    Reply this comment
  3. Frankhs
    Frankhs 29 December, 2013, 22:52

    Liberals seem to have deficits in common sense

    Let’s just pour tax money into a green auto company that makes cars no one wants nor can afford and… burst into flame.

    But But But – it’s Green!

    Reply this comment
  4. Darren
    Darren 30 December, 2013, 10:47

    I’m wondering how many liberals check out this website.

    Reply this comment
  5. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 3 January, 2014, 12:57

    I am a middle of the road liberal on social issues, hard core conservative on fiscal and financial issues…I think I probably represent the majority of Californians today- both Repugs, Dems and nearly all Independants.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Tags assigned to this article:
manufacturingAdam O'NealDorothy Rothrock

Related Articles

New 2015 laws: Hollywood wins, in-home care loses

New Year’s Day sure wasn’t a holiday from new regulations: 2015 brings 931 new laws Californians must obey. Some took effect on Jan. 1;

Brutal Tax Assault on Internet Sales

APRIL 28, 2011 By JOHN SEILER California’s tax-increase cult is lobbying to grab every last dollar it can tax —

Indian lands bill considered Wednesday

  Assembly Bill 52, which would increase the power of California’s Native American tribes to delay or halt development in