Attorney for plaintiffs in bullet-train lawsuit suggests way out
Michael J. Brady, the Redwood City attorney for Kings County and other parties suing the California High-Speed Rail Authority, offers his theory on the easiest, cleanest way for Gov. Jerry Brown to abandon the bullet-train fiasco. This is from an email he sent out yesterday:
“There is a lot of disenchantment among proponents of HSR; the voters have turned against the project; the politicians are looking for a graceful way to exit from what is now regarded as a ‘loser.’ Here is the solution, step by step — a simple and popular solution:
“1. The Legislature passes an initiative which is designed to go before the voters for approval; [the Legislature can do this; no signature gathering is necessary]; the measure could go on the November, 2014, ballot; there is time;
“2. The measure would be blissfully simple and would provide as follows: all rounds remaining in the Proposition 1A bond fund are to be redesignated and transferred to a new bond fund and placed in that fund; the proceeds are to be used for the following four purposes: water projects; law enforcement infrastructure improvements; freeway repairs; school building construction; each to receive 25% (avoids squabbling);
“3. This is a win-win for the Legislature: popular programs that Demos and GOP both support; bipartisan approval;
“4. The voters will love it-high priority programs, much more popular than the ill-fated hsr;
“5. And look at the nature of the projects: all infrastructure, using union labor, thousands of jobs!
“6. It passes; everyone’s a hero! LET’S DO IT!”
Upon examination, not much of a union concession
I don’t like the union payoff much, but it’s a logical way to grease this compromise to approval. And any big state infrastructure projects will have PLAs, so it’s not much of a concession, at least if you support capital-improvement spending on “water projects; law enforcement infrastructure improvements; freeway repairs; school building construction.”
How unusual: a trial lawyer proposing a way to quickly wrap up a case for which he’s probably billing $400 an hour.
Good for you, Mike!
Related Articles
Teacher pay raises gobble up Prop 30, LCFF funds
In 2012, California voters approved Proposition 30, which temporarily raised sales taxes on everyone and income taxes on the wealthy.
CA voter rolls: Reps take bigger hit than Dems
March 26, 2013 By John Seiler Californians still are shunning political parties more than in the past. But Republicans are
Rail court decision could run over future bonds
Is there a cow catcher on the front of the California high-speed rail project? One that pushes away future bond
