Attorney for plaintiffs in bullet-train lawsuit suggests way out

Attorney for plaintiffs in bullet-train lawsuit suggests way out

train.wreckMichael J. Brady, the Redwood City attorney for Kings County and other parties suing the California High-Speed Rail Authority, offers his theory on the easiest, cleanest way for Gov. Jerry Brown to abandon the bullet-train fiasco. This is from an email he sent out yesterday:

“There is a lot of disenchantment  among proponents of HSR; the voters have turned against the project; the politicians are looking for a graceful way to exit from what is now regarded as a ‘loser.’  Here is the solution, step by step — a simple and popular solution:

“1. The Legislature passes an initiative which is designed to go before the voters for approval; [the Legislature can do this; no signature gathering is necessary]; the measure could go on the November, 2014, ballot; there is time;

“2. The measure would be blissfully simple and would provide as follows:  all rounds remaining in the Proposition 1A bond fund are to be redesignated and transferred to a new bond fund and placed in that fund; the proceeds are to be used for the following four purposes:  water projects; law enforcement infrastructure improvements; freeway repairs; school building construction; each to receive 25% (avoids squabbling);

“3. This is a win-win for the Legislature:  popular programs that Demos and GOP both support; bipartisan approval;

“4. The voters will love it-high priority programs, much more popular than the ill-fated hsr;

“5. And look at the nature of the  projects:  all infrastructure, using union labor, thousands of jobs! 

“6. It passes; everyone’s a hero! LET’S DO IT!”

Upon examination, not much of a union concession

I don’t like the union payoff much, but it’s a logical way to grease this compromise to approval. And any big state infrastructure projects will have PLAs, so it’s not much of a concession, at least if you support capital-improvement spending on “water projects; law enforcement infrastructure improvements; freeway repairs; school building construction.”

How unusual: a trial lawyer proposing a way to quickly wrap up a case for which he’s probably billing $400 an hour.

Good for you, Mike!

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Donkey
    Donkey 1 March, 2014, 16:53

    One more boondoggle from the RAGWUS feeding politicians living in Sactown.
    🙂

    Reply this comment
  2. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 1 March, 2014, 19:27

    Yawn!

    Reply this comment
  3. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 1 March, 2014, 19:58

    What are “law enforcement infrastructure improvements”??

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 2 March, 2014, 20:21

      Prisons and jails Rex! Lets not leave out their new bag of killer toys also, can you say drones!! 🙂

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

‘Cool roads’ AB 296 threatens Southern California’s groundwater

Sept. 10, 2012 By Wayne Lusvardi More scientific evidence is mounting against California Assembly Bill 296, which would fund pilot projects

Remember Pearl Harbor — 73 years ago

Most of us remember where we were on 9/11. Older baby boomers remember where they were when JFK was shot.

Is the Golden State the greenest and fairest of them all?

  How To Get Your Ex Back Over Text Is California the greenest and fairest state when it comes to