San Fran = Rwanda

San Fran = Rwanda

San Francisco wikimediaSan Francisco is by far the most liberal city in the United States. In the 2012 election, it voted 83 percent for Democratic President Obama and 13 percent for Republican Mitt Romney.

So one would think that SF would have the least “income inequality” of any city in America. Income inequality is the latest trend issue for liberals, being taken up by the president in numerous recent speeches; and being the topic of a best-selling new fad book, “Capital in the 21st Century,” by French academic Thomas Piketty.

SF, obviously, must be enacting and enforcing policies to reduce the gap between rich and poor.

Wrong.

SF has the highest income inequality of any American city, actually way up near the level of the country of Rwanda, according to a new study by the city’s Human Services Agency.

Actually, this should not be surprising. SF’s enlightened liberals enact numerous laws sharply restricting property use, which drives up property prices to sky-high levels. California adds to that, especially with the Stalinist California Coastal Commission, which sharply restricts housing along the coast.

Restrictions on businesses, as well as a minimum wage that could rise to $15 an year, also restrict businesses’ ability to create middle-class jobs. It’s a paradox that raising the minimum wage actually hurts low-wage workers; but they are hurt because their jobs evaporate.

Thanks to liberal laws and regulations, SF now is so expensive it requires at least $200,000 a year in salary to live for what it would take $50,000 to do so in Texas or some other enlightened state.

If you’re rich, SF still is a beautiful, charming city. If you’re poor, you get government benefits. If you’re middle-class, you get out.

The sad thing is that Rwanda will reform its policies before SF does.

 

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Queeg
    Queeg 19 May, 2014, 21:25

    Powerful article about Utopia.

    Reply this comment
  2. Rex the Wonder Dog!
    Rex the Wonder Dog! 19 May, 2014, 23:58

    If you’re rich, SF still is a beautiful, charming city. –

    SF sucks eggs. It is cold year round. Overcast much of the time. Has terrible congestion. And a lack of hot babes if you’re a hetro male.

    Reply this comment
    • Donkey
      Donkey 20 May, 2014, 06:57

      It is cold most of the time!! I just missed being shot up there in 1979 chasing a purse snatcher at the Wharf. Beautiful place though. 🙂

      Reply this comment
  3. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 20 May, 2014, 20:23

    SF is a toilet like San Diego….

    Miserable, dirty, expensive, bad kook local government.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply


Tags assigned to this article:
John Seilerminimum wageSan FranciscoRwanda

Related Articles

Unpublicized Budget Consequences

Katy Grimes: Sources close to the Department of Developmental Services report that a potentially devastating consequence of the Legislature not

Little Hoover's pension hearing

Here’s a notice for a public pension hearing by the Little Hoover Commission: On Thursday, April 22, 2010, the Little

Plantronics sending employees to Mexico

Jan. 14, 2013 By John Seiler For 15 years I’ve used Plantronics’ great headsets with Dragon Naturallyspeaking and Skype. The