High-speed rail without federal money?

High-speed rail without federal money?

high-speed-rail-map-320Last week Gov. Jerry Brown said he would continue building the high-speed rail project without federal money. It’s commendable he doesn’t want to burden U.S. taxpayers.

But it’s hard to see how the project can be built without federal money, which has funded every recent major mass-transit project in America. That means the feds only would fund $3.5 billion of the project, money already allocated, with Californians taking the burden for the rest of the estimated $68 billion.

It’s also reality that the Republican U.S. House of Representatives, especially now that Kevin McCarthy is the majority leader, will not spend a penny on the project. McCarthy strongly opposes it for his home state.

It’s also highly unlikely Republicans will lose control of the House in November, and probably even in 2016. So, realistically, the earliest Democrats could take over the House would be in 2018, perhaps as a reaction against a Republican president elected in 2016, as happened when Democrats took over the House in 2006 when George W. Bush was president.

So — also assuming Democrats control the Senate — it would be 2019 before Democrats could pass a high-speed rail subsidy bill in Congress — five years from now.

But — stay with me here — that would assume a Republican president, who probably would not be keen on spending billions on California, a state the GOP no longer comes close to carrying.

And if a Democrat is elected president in 2016, that means the GOP still would win the House in 2018 — again on the historical data that sitting presidents usually lose mid-term elections.

So now we move to 2020, when Democrats realistically could win the presidency and both houses of Congress in circumstances we can’t possibly predict. They would take office in 2021, seven years from now.

Today we also can’t possibly predict the technological, economic and other realities of 2021 in California, America and the world.

Meanwhile, assuming he is re-elected in November, Brown finally will leave office as his fourth term as governor ends in Jan. 2019. It’s unlikely his successor, facing money pressures we can’t imagine today, especially on pensions, would continue the project.

So high-speed rail remains what I have said about it from the beginning: a way to spend $3.5 billion in federal money and $9.9 billion in state bond funds already allocated. To that, the train is incidental.

2 comments

Write a comment
  1. David Mcallister
    David Mcallister 10 August, 2014, 10:18

    This is being pushed by the public unions. They see an endless stream of money from this boondoggle and will fight tooth and nail to keep the “Brown Streak” alive.

    Reply this comment
  2. JPR11
    JPR11 10 August, 2014, 17:18

    Just look at the Bay Bridge project for a clue on this boondoggle. That one started at $1b and 3 years. It ended over $6B and over 10 years. Where is the rider and cost per ride justification to support HSR when you can fly in less time and under $100? Brown want a legacy like Pops water project to LA. CA should spend money on water storage not Moon Beam fantasizes.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Dutton's CARB bill moves to floor

This is from Sen. Dutton’s office today: Dutton Air Board Transparency Measure Moves to Senate Floor SACRAMENTO – A bill

Reuters bests state media at covering San Bernardino’s collapse

April 1, 2013 By Chris Reed If you had to fashion a nut graph to explain why so many local

Siskiyou County Declaration of Independence

  Hooray for Siskiyou County, whose Board of Supervisors just voted for the county to secede from California! They’re tired