100,000 lacking ID could lose Covered CA coverage

100,000 lacking ID could lose Covered CA coverage

Covered California front page, Oct. 3, 2013Covered California could lose up to 100,000 enrollees who haven’t proven their eligibility under the state’s version of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare.

According to the ACA, unlawful U.S. residents aren’t permitted to receive coverage. Yet, although California is home to many immigrants who crossed the border illegally, Covered California officials vow that most of those whose coverage is at risk are actually legal residents.

Peter Lee, Covered California’s executive director, told the Los Angeles Times that 600,000 documents from applications for coverage have been processed in an effort to verify citizenship or legal residency. After a round of early September mailings notifying those whose coverage is on the line, the state of California will be required by law to eliminate that coverage in October or later.

The challenge comes at an importune moment for Lee, whose success in getting Covered California up and running recently landed him a $53,000 bonus atop his base salary of over $260,000 a year. Lee’s ability to avoid the embarrassing failures of other state exchanges, such as Oregon’s, stemmed from his time at ground zero in the federal health care establishment.

According to his biography at the National Academy for State Health Policy, Lee served as Deputy Director for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in Washington, D.C. He also took on the role of Director of Delivery System Reform for the Office of Health Reform for the Health and Human Services, an Obama administration position where Lee coordinated his efforts with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

Broader problems

Under Lee, Covered California rushed applicants into the exchange system to help prevent a so-called “death spiral” during the critical Obamacare enrollment period. The systemic problems with online Obamacare registration and signups raised fears that a “death spiral” scenario would unfold, in which enrollment hurdles and public skepticism would create small “risk pools” composed disproportionately of costly to insure older and infirm applicants.

Obamacare supporters were relieved when that didn’t happen fast enough to sink the ACA. Critics, however, objected to an enrollment process that signed up applicants regardless of whether or not they might turn out to be ineligible for coverage. In effect, that strategy helped create risk pools that would artificially stave off a death spiral, with the intention of retroactively filtering out enrollees whose applications weren’t viable to begin with.

A substantial percentage of applicants fell into that category at the time of Obamacare enrollment. In May this year, out of 8 million people enrolled in individual policies through the ACA, fully 1 million lacked proof of citizenship or legal residency, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. That agency, known as CMS, also revealed in mid-August that over half of that number were now able to document their eligibility.


But, as Bloomberg reported, an additional class of ineligible enrollees had emerged: 1 million people had failed to verify their incomes, which is essential because Obamacare eligibility for coverage subsidies depends on income. According to Bloomberg, “CMS didn’t say how many of those cases have been cleared up, and no deadline has been set to cancel their coverage. They ‘will hear from the marketplace at a later date,’ the agency said in the statement.”

All told, federal officials determined in June that some 2 million instances of “data discrepancies” exist in applications for Obamacare coverage.

Alone, Covered California accounted for 1.2 million enrollments during the ACA signup period, using a federal “data hub” to verify citizenship or immigration documentation. That quick-fix approach pushed through hundreds of thousands of incomplete or inconsistent applications — getting Obamacare implementation off the ground first, and asking questions only later. In 2013, the Obama administration abandoned plans to require insurance exchanges to verify eligibility, allowing enrollees to “self-report” until a planned increase in verification requirements for 2015.


Write a comment
  1. theprez
    theprez 30 August, 2014, 05:32

    If you applied, you are a citizen. That is settled science. Just like the ball always breaks towards the ocean on a putt, on a seaside course.

    Reply this comment
  2. Darksecret
    Darksecret 30 August, 2014, 18:54

    We all knew it would be implemented by hook or by crook .Welcome to your prison and enjoy your stay !

    Reply this comment
  3. Queeg
    Queeg 30 August, 2014, 21:20

    Always….free lunches have consequences.

    Last free lunch I attended, I got second degree burns from EL FERNO, the third world heat lamp the time share sales person beamed on ye!

    Reply this comment
  4. bob
    bob 30 August, 2014, 22:43

    Amerikans wanted Obammiecare and there gonna get it good and hard

    Obamacare: The Final Payment–Raiding the Assets of Low-Income and Poor Americans
    Obamacare herds the poor into Medicaid which requires some enrollees to forfeit homes and other assets they might have to the state to cover the cost of their medical care. The research article below is meticulous and demonstrates that Obamacare was not enacted to serve the people.


    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
Covered CaliforniaObamacareJames Poulosheath care

Related Articles

Democratic supermajority rests on one Senate seat

The only thing standing in the way of a Democratic supermajority in the Legislature is one Southern California Senate seat.  Democrats

Desalination gaining support as long-term response to CA drought

With California’s snowpack at the lowest level in a century, Governor Jerry Brown announced Wednesday the first mandatory water reductions in state

CA could suspend high-school exit exam

State Sen. Carol Liu, D-Pasadena, has introduced Senate Bill 172, which “would remove the high school exit examination as a condition