CA Senate pushes $400M Hollywood tax credits

CA Senate pushes $400M Hollywood tax credits

Hollywood SignA California Senate committee wants to quadruple the entertainment industry subsidies keeping production in Hollywood.

With a unanimous vote, the appropriations committee passed a $300 million increase in tax credits for film and television, bringing the size of the controversial program up to $400 million. Assembly Bill 1839 is coauthored by Assemblymen Raul Bocanegra, D-Pacoima, and Mike Gatto, D-Los Angeles.

The committee has put its fingerprints on the bill, tinkering with some key provisions. As Deadline Hollywood reports, the legislation now strips out at least one part of the current system — a complex lottery system that came in for criticism even from advocates of subsidizing production. “Applicants will be ranked according to the net new jobs created and overall positive economic impact for the entire state,” said Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, calling the lottery “flawed and arbitrary.”

Lottery reform is designed to enable lawmakers to better prevent subsidy abuses by studios and production companies. Falsely inflated job creation numbers, for instance, would run afoul of the new incentive rankings, whereby recipients are chosen for a greater share of tax credits. De Leon explained that, under the new system, applicants for credits would be ranked according to jobs created and overall economic benefit to the state of California.

Having agreed on the legislative tweaks, the committee now sends AB1839 to the full Senate, as well as the Assembly floor, where it passed overwhelmingly in its original form.

There is some uncertainty as to whether Gov. Jerry Brown will extend his support, however. The governor has been silent on the issue for months. Pressed by Variety, Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti sounded an optimistic tone. “I wouldn’t be naive enough to say that the governor is going to come down on that exact number,” he said. “But I have just watched the evolution, where this governor understands that this is a key industry, where he and his staff have told us privately we are not going to preside over its decline, and where understands it is no longer just a Southern California issue.”

An industry arms race

In addition to expanding the already sizable subsidy program, the bill would extend the program at least to 2019 — a concerted effort to stay competitive with the state of New York. Legislators in the Empire State maintain their own $400 million-plus Film Tax Credit Program, and ensure that TV production receives attractive credits as well. These measures have been so effective in luring production away from Hollywood that last year, for the first time on record, New York City surpassed Los Angeles in the production of hour-long pilot episodes of televised dramas.

To discourage jockeying across types of production and apples-to-apples competition for cash, AB1839 set up individual baskets of money for four categories of productions: independent films, TV pilots and renewed series, feature films, and — in a telling move — productions coming back to California from out of state.

A losing battle

Although AB1839 boasts powerful support in Los Angeles and Sacramento, evidence strongly suggests that California is fighting a losing battle — by fiscal standards if not political ones. A recent Legislative Analyst’s Office report concluded that the Golden State is actually failing to recoup its supposed investment in keeping the entertainment industry local, losing some 35 cents on the dollar.

As KPCC reported, the LAO admitted, “[I]deally, states would not compete on the basis of subsidies.” Nevertheless, the political pressure to spend anyway remained strong, “Given that other states and countries offer subsidies, it might be difficult for California not to provide subsidies and still maintain its leadership position in this industry.”

Unless Brown takes a firm stand against his own party, it’s likely that California’s entertainment industry subsidies will continue into the rest of this decade and beyond.

2 comments

Write a comment
  1. NorCalLibertarian
    NorCalLibertarian 20 August, 2014, 09:56

    Another potential $400M to pay for California’s needs down the drain (or into the L.A. cesspool?). The L.A. mafia in our statehouse is at it again! How are they going to replace this $400M giveaway of public funds? What guarantee is there that the film industry will stay in California…along with its tightening restrictions on all industries and residents? How will the lost taxes be replaced? More taxation of the people or other industries?
    How will this Los Angeles benefit help us in the rural areas? This is another reason (400 million of them) for the State of Jefferson movement to succeed! Thank you Senator Nielsen, for not going along with this loss of taxpayers’ money…Ted Gaines is running for another office and he just lost three votes out of this house for selling us out!

    Reply this comment
  2. dork
    dork 20 August, 2014, 17:58

    Why in the world would the legislature do this when it is a well known FACT that HOLLYWOOD is a GROSS POLLUTER and the second largest Polluter in the State, behind Big Oil. I guess we now know how important this Global Warming religion really is. Shouldn’t this be ILLEGAL according to AB32?? Shouldn’t they be run out of town also?? I think so.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



Related Articles

Voters send Darrell Issa back to Congress

Darrell Issa is projected to win a ninth term in Congress, according to the Associated Press, despite an unexpectedly strong

Cal State University system hikes fees to offset tuition freeze

What a difference five years makes. In 2010, the California State University system issued $352 million in revenue bonds. Earlier this month,

Analysts look to water markets to fight CA drought

Scrambling for workable models found elsewhere in resources policy, some analysts have begun to argue that California should regulate markets for