2014’s low turnout eases path for 2016 tenure, pension ballot measures

2014’s low turnout eases path for 2016 tenure, pension ballot measures

ballot-measureRick Claussen, Ned Wigglesworth, and Aaron McLear of the Redwood Pacific consulting group have released an interesting memo that is good news for those considering taking on public employee unions in 2016 with ballot measures putting limits on government pensions or scrapping state laws allowing teachers to receive lifetime tenure after less than two years on the job.

The historically low turnout in the 2014 general election will dramatically lower the number of signatures required to qualify ballot initiatives in 2016. As of November 17, turnout was at 40.1%, far surpassing the previous low mark of 50.6% in 2002.

Article II of the state Constitution dictates that the number of signatures required to qualify a ballot initiative is based on participation in the previous gubernatorial election – currently at 6.9 million votes with some outstanding ballots yet to count.

There are other factors playing into 2016’s initiative landscape:

1) With the passage of SB 202 in 2011, all initiatives and referenda are pushed to November general elections every two years

2) Democrats and independents are expected to be a larger percentage of the 2016 electorate, a speculation which could produce initiatives more favorable to that electorate

3) SB 1253 (2014) made several changes to the initiative process

  • Extends the collection window from 150 days to 180 days
  • Adds a 30 day public review period upon submission of a measure to the Attorney General for title and summary
  • Requires notification to the Secretary of State immediately upon collection of 25% of the required signatures
  • Requires a legislative informational hearing upon this notification
  • Allows proponents to withdraw a qualified measure any time before 131 days before an election

Several factors can impact the cost of signature gathering, such as competition with other initiatives, timeline, and the subject of a measure. But the lower signature threshold and extended collection window very likely will make qualifying initiatives far less expensive than ever before, potentially producing a very long ballot in 2016.

In 2014, it took 807,615 valid signatures to get a proposed state constitutional amendment on the ballot. The Redwood officials expect that in 2016, it will only take 560,000.

In 2014, it took 504,760 valid signatures to get an initiative on the state ballot. It looks like it will only take 350,000 in 2016.

Of course, this relative ease in getting ballot measures before voters extends to potential measures from any political camp. But given unions’ increasing focus on monkey-wrenching signature gathering for ballot measures on causes they oppose, this could be especially helpful to those who back such causes — starting with pension and tenure reform.

8 comments

Write a comment
  1. maximilian
    maximilian 18 November, 2014, 11:42

    This is a piece of good news for pension reform advocates. However, the downside to any effort will be the firewall created by the AG (Kamala Harris), who has editorial control on how the initiative will read. Considering how she sabotaged San Jose Mayor Reed’s previous attempt to place a pension reform initiative on the 2014 ballot, expect her to use her editorial pen to create havoc, once again. According to Dave Low, chairman of Californians for Retirement Security, “We are disappointed that the Attorney General’s title and summary of the Reed measure doesn’t speak to the main motivation of its proponents: To slash the retirement benefits and retiree health care of current and future employees.” Kamala Harris, shill for the unions.

    Reply this comment
  2. LetitCollapse
    LetitCollapse 18 November, 2014, 17:46

    Ah, come on, guys. IF a miracle happens and one of these pension measures actually makes it to the vote of the people it will be so watered down by the time the court and the Secty of State get to it that it will be meaningless. You know how the game is played in California. You’ve lived here long enough. How many times do you have to get fooled before you finally catch on. The learning curve in the conservative blogs are steep, steep, steep! You folks promote ‘hope and change’ for the home team just like Obola did for his. In the end? Nothing changes. And nothing will change until the plastic economic bubble finally pops for good with no reserves on hand to bail anyone out. Then you will get your change. Trust me on that! 😀

    Reply this comment
  3. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 19 November, 2014, 09:57

    Yawn.

    Reply this comment
  4. SkippingDog
    SkippingDog 19 November, 2014, 11:36

    Still digging for that pony, eh Chris?

    Reply this comment
  5. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 20 November, 2014, 08:43

    Wasn’t Aaron McLear one of GAS’s assistants? Now those are credentials!!

    Reply this comment
  6. SeeSaw
    SeeSaw 20 November, 2014, 08:50

    The Secy of State does not “get” to the initiative, LIC. Once the AG clears it for signature gathering, the SOS places it in circulation–The SOS is just the facilitator–much like CalPERS’s relationship to CA’s public entities. The, “Reed Initiative”, was cleared for signature gathering–it was never circulated by Reed and his cronies, because they could not find the funding. Now he must start over with a new initiative–I don’t think that factor tranlates into,”easier”.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment



Related Articles

CalWatchdog Morning Read – December 9

Poll: State higher education is too darn expensive Obama sides with Boxer against Feinstein in water rift Rural Republicans bracing

Kudos to Brown on lawsuit bill

Steven Greenhut: Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law today SB 1186, which fights those predatory lawsuits by attorneys who use

Economic boom fake

The U.S. economy in the third quarter supposedly enjoyed strong economic growth of 3.5 percent. But look between the lines