GOP lawmaker: fund schools with high-speed rail bonds

GOP lawmaker: fund schools with high-speed rail bonds

scottwilk_portrait2013A Republican lawmaker wants to turn money for California’s high-speed rail project into funding for schools.

Assemblyman Scott Wilk, R-Santa Clarita, introduced Assembly Bill 6, which would cancel outstanding bond funds approved by Proposition 1A, a 2008 voter-approved initiative to fund the state’s high-speed rail project with $9 billion in bonds. In its place, voters would be asked to spend the remaining funds on constructing and modernizing dilapidated school facilities throughout the state.

“Don’t get me wrong, I love trains and would be happy to be able to take one from Los Angeles to San Francisco for ‘dinner and a show’ and back,” Wilk wrote in a recent piece at the Los Angeles Daily News, “but not at the expense of the people of California.”

Before allocating up to  $8 billion for school construction, AB6 first would first pay off the outstanding debts incurred for the state’s high-speed rail project. The bill requires two-thirds approval of the state Legislature and a majority approval of voters.

“Our students deserve to have well-maintained facilities and it is irresponsible to continue prioritizing the crazy train over our schools,” Wilk said, echoing a favorite phrase coined by GOP gubernatorial candidate Neel Kashkari, who on Nov. 4 lost to Gov. Jerry Brown. “The high-speed rail boondoggle has been a proven failure and it’s time we spend taxpayer dollars in a responsible way.”

State Allocation Board: California needs as much as $12 billion for schools

Wilk points to a Jan. 2014 report by the State Allocation Board that contends California needs to devote as much as $12 billion toward new school construction and another $5 billion to modernization of existing facilities. The obscure board, which includes representatives from the governor’s office and the Legislature, couldn’t definitively peg the total cost of school modernization.  Other State Allocation Board estimates put the figure between $5.9 billion and $6.6 billion.

“There is demand for new construction and modernization funding,” the State Allocation Board School Facility Program Review Subcommittee concluded earlier this year. “The Subcommittee did not come to a consensus on a total dollar amount needed for future school facilities or the exact structure of a future bond.”

The committee struggled to identify the state’s total school modernization costs, in part, because “California does not track the number of schools and classrooms available for use. …

“Currently, data on the number of school sites and classrooms and/or the age of the facilities in the State is unknown.”

Wilk: Put schools before bullet train

highspeedrail-300x169How likely is Wilk’s idea to gain traction in Sacramento? Brown remained a steadfast supporter of the project during his reelection campaign. However, support is wavering among other Democratic leaders and state lawmakers. Wilk’s proposal to transfer rail funds to schools could provide liberal Democrats a reason to join a burgeoning right-left alliance against the state’s rail project.

CalWatchdog.com contributor Chris Reed, who has reported extensively on the problems with California’s high-speed rail project, noted that one of the  biggest critics has been Kevin Drum, a reporter for the liberal Mother Jones magazine.

Drum has questioned the ridership assumptions produced by New York-based Parsons Brinkerhoff, which claimed “the high-speed rail system could carry 116 million passengers a year, based on running trains with 1,000 seats both north and south every five minutes, 19 hours a day and 365 days a year.” Drum also pointed out the potential conflict of interest: Parsons Brinkerhoff  helped fund the initiative and has a stake in the outcome.

Flaws in California’s use of school facilities

Wilk’s idea is likely to gain support among conservatives and taxpayer groups, who view the state’s high-speed rail project as an irresponsible boondoggle that enriches private companies at public expense. Since 1998, state voters have approved $35 billion in school construction and modernization bonds. The most recent state bond package, $5 billion approved in 2006, has nearly been exhausted, with just $187.3 million remaining for school construction and $142.4 million left for seismic repair.

California’s school facility repair program, much like the state’s high-speed rail project, has faced similar questions about flawed oversight and accountability. School bond funds have been spent to modernize portable school buildings, despite their shorter life spans.

“Some concerns about the current program included whether a portable can be truly modernized, as well as the concern that was also expressed in the new construction section that 30 year funds were being spent on buildings that would not have a 30 year life span,” the State Allocation Board found in its Jan. 2014 report.

Any attempt to shift the high-speed rail bonds to schools would different state political functions to the head of the class. Brown has made the rail project his baby, but also is working on reforming school finances.

The teachers’ unions are strong Brown allies. But in addition to the need for school construction and repairs, the California State Teachers Retirement System needs $4.5 billion a year from the general fund to remain solvent.

With such financial problems ahead on the train tracks, high-speed rail may be a ready candidate for the junk yard.

4 comments

Write a comment
  1. Ulysses Uhaul
    Ulysses Uhaul 15 December, 2014, 09:37

    Yep. Need every buck for all our uncaring communications challenged doomers to learn Spanish as a first language!

    Reply this comment
  2. bob
    bob 15 December, 2014, 20:12

    How dare they try to take away jerry’s choo-choo!

    Reply this comment
  3. Ken
    Ken 16 December, 2014, 12:58

    Yes folks, conservatives drag their knuckles too. What a showboater. He must have been dropped as a kid.

    Reply this comment
  4. Dawn Urbanek
    Dawn Urbanek 27 June, 2016, 18:56

    “Currently, data on the number of school sites and classrooms and/or the age of the facilities in the State is unknown.”

    The answer is most-

    There has been a State wide plan to end State funding of Public Education Facilities because the Legislators and governor know that people always step up and are willing to tax themselves more for K-12. The CA constitution requires that Public education (especially K-12) be funded first before any other spending priority. So thank God people are starting to see that the State does not have the right to unilaterally shift the peoples spending priority from Public Education to High Speed Rail. Look at the 2016 5- year infrastructure spending plan which does not allocate a single dime to K-12 Infrastructure- well that is because Jerry Brown wants every school district – K-12 – Community College and County offices of education to pay for facilities with new bond measures so that he can keep $51 billion in “transportation spending” for high speed rail. Just like OBAMA just learned this is not a dictatorship the Governor and our legislature have to honor the constitution they cannot rewrite state spending priorities without a vote of the people.Just FYI- the Capistrano Unified School District in OC is trying to put a $1.1 billion dollar bond on the November ballot.If you listen to Board audio for the last board meeting you will see how ridicules it is to give 7 school board members the right to tax the people with a Billion dollar Bond… scary- but every school district will try and pass a bond because the State’s new education funding formula provides per pupil funding at 2007-08 levels not to be reached until 2021… that is flat funding for 14 years while employees get raises every year- I can promise you that there are no facilities in CA schools that have been adequately maintained If you want to read my supporting documentation:

    Billion dollar bond for CUSD – why taxpayers should say no.

    http://disclosurecusd.blogspot.com/2016/06/1-billion-dollar-bond-for-capistrano.html

    Federal Complaint Challenging the way CA raises Revenue and spends tax money – Count 12- Collaboration – Collusion – Conspiracy

    http://peopleforstudentrights.com/index.php/complaint/count-12

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*



Related Articles

Nitrogen fix could cancel CA fertilizer tax

A natural bacterial colonization process could end the proposed regulation of agricultural nitrate and taxation of fertilizer in California.  Energy

The upsides of low turnout

This election, your vote counted double. “When it’s 50 % turnout, your voting power is doubled #math,” Paul Mitchell of Political

State senator calls for peaceful transition of presidential power

As the state’s 55 electors carry out their constitutional duty on Monday and cast their votes for president of the