Is climate a winning issue for Tom Steyer?

Is climate a winning issue for Tom Steyer?

Thomas SteyerCan the climate vote?

According to National Journal, billionaire hedge-fund maestro Tom Steyer is considering a run for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif. In a discussion on Reddit, he said:

Steyer defended his heavy spending in several 2014 elections, when he shelled out $74 million with very mixed results to help candidates committed to climate action. “We worked in 7 statewide races. We won 3. Lost 4. Climate and energy were top issues in every race,” Steyer said in an “Ask Me Anything” interview with Reddit users.

“That’s new. Turnout was high in our target populations. But there was a poor Democratic performance nationwide in 2014, and in some states it washed over us. That won’t be true in the future, and climate change becomes more important and more urgent every day,” added the billionaire climate advocate and former hedge-fund manager from California.

Except that, as reported, according to a new Hoover Institution poll, “Dealing with the environment” was a top issue for just 32 percent of voters and “Global warming” 26 percent. By contrast, “Economic growth” was 72 percent and “Improving jobs” 66 percent.

That reflects the state’s status as the most impoverished in the nation, when the immense cost of living here is taken into account. People don’t worry about the oceans boiling  over when they can’t pay the rent.

So climate issues would be a tough sell even among Democrats.


As to global warming — now usually called “climate change” just in case there isn’t any global warming — on Steyer’s side is this AP report, “Both the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA calculated that in 2014 the world had its hottest year in 135 years of record-keeping.”

On the other side is this summary from Climate Depot: “Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues.” Details at the link.

And this, from the Washington Post: “Ice cover on the Great Lakes has made quite a leap after the first, week-long cold snap of the season.”

Steyer also will not be facing only Republicans, who haven’t done well statewide in California lately. So the higher Democratic turnout of 2016 vs. 2014 won’t help. Instead, as noted here yesterday, his likely opponents will be Attorney General Kamala Harris and Rep. Loretta Sanchez, both of whom likely will take similar “climate change” stances to his — but have stronger grassroots supporters already.

Moreover, running a personal campaign is a lot different from running an issues campaign. A big question is: Do voters like you? Harris and Sanchez have proven vote-getting personae. Steyer might, or might not. For now, it’s an unknown.

On the positive side, if he blows $100 million on his campaign, it will help stimulate the state economy.


Write a comment
  1. Sean
    Sean 17 January, 2015, 08:49

    There are a lot of factors that led to the drubbing that Democrats took in the 2014 mid-terms but one of least effective issues for them was climate change. California is in the midst of an interesting experiment. It is trying to lead the way on climate issues by instituting policies that make energy more expensive. It already has one of the highest utility rates in the country and the charges on transportation fuel have just begun to be felt at the pumps. AB32 is programmed to steadily rachet up the price of carbon over the next 5 years by being applied to greater proportion of fossil fuels being used. With the price of energy stinging the less affluent in the inland valleys because of the higher cost of fuel and the greater heating and cooling loads than on the coast, I suspect that Tom Steyers climate agenda will not be a great vote getter among Californians making less than $100k/year.

    Reply this comment
  2. bob
    bob 17 January, 2015, 14:08

    Darrel Stinkbug has made it clear he and the rest of the DemoNcrats want the cost of gas to be high. He said he wants the cost to “sting.”

    DemoNcrats are the enemies of working people everywhere. DemoNcrats want the cost of fuel to be expensive as possible. They want to tax the shiite out of it so the average person will not be able to drive much at all and will be forced to live in small cracker box housing and be forced into [email protected] public transportation.

    Of course Stinkbug and his cronies will not be subject to any of this. They will continue to drive in gas guzzlers, live in huge houses and fly in jets all over the world.

    Why any working person would vote for these [email protected] is beyond reason. As someone here once said it is like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.

    Reply this comment
  3. Bruce
    Bruce 17 January, 2015, 14:16

    On the flip side of Steyer’s global warming is a solar hibernation as predicted by John L. Casey in his book “Dark Winter”. Sun cycles, not man, influences Earth’s climate and a deep freeze is coming according to Casey.

    Reply this comment
  4. desmond
    desmond 18 January, 2015, 06:36

    97 % of scientists believed Galieo was wrong and dangerous. Their science shied that the sun revolved around the earth. He had it the other way around. The scientists believed their science to be religion.

    Reply this comment
  5. Bruce
    Bruce 18 January, 2015, 11:15

    If one looks into Steyer’s full investment portfolio, it may reveal a hypocrite.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Tags assigned to this article:
John SeilerKamala HarrisLoretta SanchezTom Steyer

Related Articles

Sacramento jumps the shark on arena deal

March 24, 2013 By Katy Grimes Some people want something so badly, they’ll sell their souls to the devil, they’ll

Productivity slowing — bad news for budgets

Jan. 17, 2013 By John Seiler Both the U.S. and California budgets depend on continuing economic growth. Gov. Jerry Brown

Vergara appeal decision: Nixon goes to China for Jerry Brown?

To an astounding degree, prominent California Democrats have so far avoided substantive comment on Judge Rolf Treu’s landmark — but