Suh avoids high-tax CA, signs with Miami

suh, wikimediaAs the most talented NFL free agent this spring, former Detroit Lion Ndamukong Suh had his pick of teams. In trouble often for his on-field antics, such as stepping on Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rogers’ ankle in the playoffs, he seemed a natural Oakland Raider “bad boy” in the line of such legends as John “Tooz” Matsuzak and Lyle Alzado.

But instead of the Raiders and their symbol of a pirate and swords, Suh signed with Miami and their symbol of a green dolphin. The likely reason, according to ESPN: The Dolphins were more competitive because his after-taxes pay will be higher:

A league source told ESPN.com that Detroit’s offer to Suh was $17 million per year with $58 million guaranteed — a deal that would have still made Suh the highest-paid defensive player in the NFL.

Florida doesn’t have any state income tax, so in order for the Lions and the Raiders to match the after tax net earnings on a $60 million guarantee, the Lions would have had to pay Suh approximately $64.9 million and the Raiders would have had to pay $70.1 million, said sports tax specialist Robert Raiola, senior manager at the accounting firm O’Connor Davies in New York.

Suh has to pay federal income tax as well as some so-called “Jock Taxes” for the days he works in a city while playing. Suh’s net earnings on the assumption of $60 million guaranteed will come out to about $34.7 million, Raiola said.

J.J. Watt of the Houston Texans set the market in 2014 when he signed a six-year, $100 million contract with $51.8 million in guaranteed money.

Texas also doesn’t have a state income tax, benefiting Watt by staying there.

Breitbart also reported:

Both the Oakland Raiders and Lions pursued the defensive tackle. But Suh opted to sign with the Miami Dolphins. Whereas California would have grabbed 13.3 percent of Suh’s paycheck, and Michigan a more modest 4.25 percent, the Sunshine State leaves Suh’s money alone. Florida, like NFL host states Washington and Texas, levies no income tax.

It should be noted he won’t get all that money. Top athletes have to pay a large chunk to agents, accountants, investment advisers, lawyers and sometimes publicists. That’s why, if they’re not careful, even millionaires can go broke quickly when their playing days are over. So the money he saves by playing in a state without an income tax could pay off big in the long run.

Suh still will have to pay the “jock” tax whenever he plays in California against Oakland, San Francisco or San Diego — or whatever team or teams might end up in Los Angeles.

California has won major sports championships in recent years, including the Los Angeles Kings in hockey last year, the Los Angeles Lakers in basketball in 2010 and the San Francisco Giants in baseball also last year.

But the state’s last Super Bowl victory was the San Francisco 49ers way back in 1995.

2 comments

Write a comment
  1. Richard Rider
    Richard Rider 10 March, 2015, 06:36

    I’ve been writing about this problem ever since Prop 30 passed. To summarize the CA income tax from my fact sheet:

    Prior to Prop 30 passing in Nov. 2012, CA already had the 3rd worst state income tax rate in the nation. Our 9.3% tax bracket started at $48,942 for people filing as individuals. 10.3% started at $1 million.

    Now our “millionaires’ tax” rate is 13.3% – including capital gains (CA total CG rate now the 2nd highest in the world!). 10+% taxes now start at $250K.

    CA now has by far the nation’s highest state income tax rate. We are 21% higher than 2nd place Hawaii, 34% higher than Oregon, 48% higher than the next 2 states, and a heck of a lot higher than all the rest – including 7 states with zero state income tax – and 2 more that tax only dividends and interest income.

    CA is so bad, we also have the 2nd highest state income tax bracket. AND the 3rd. Plus the 5th and 7th.
    http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation.org/files/docs/ff2013.pdf Table #12
    and
    http://tinyurl.com/CA-income-tax-graph

    Reply this comment
  2. Richard Rider
    Richard Rider 10 March, 2015, 06:42

    The quality of California sports teams will be negatively impacted by our sky-high state income tax. But the two state corporate centers may be able to offset that disadvantages with bonuses to players. That’s teams in LA and SF.

    The teams in Sacramento, Oakland, and San Diego are the ones that will really suffer from this tax — especially after the Democrats make Prop 30’s income tax a semi-permanent fixture, as expected by 2016.

    There’s some Karma in this — sports fans who voted for Prop 30 will never connect the dots with their moribund teams, but they should.

    Hate millionaires? Well, hate the millionaire ATHLETES you lionize.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply



John Seiler

John Seiler

John Seiler has been writing about California for 25 years. That includes 22 years as an editorial writer for the Orange County Register and two years for CalWatchDog.com, where he is managing editor. He attended the University of Michigan and graduated from Hillsdale College. He was a Russian linguist in U.S. Army military intelligence from 1978 to 1982. He was an editor and writer for Phillips Publishing Company from 1983 to 1986. He has written for Policy Review, Chronicles, LewRockwell.com, Flash Report and numerous other publications. His email: [email protected]

Related Articles

CA govt. workers score top salaries

A new survey by the U.S. Census Bureau found that California government workers pull down among the highest compensation in

Good news on redevelopment

California taxpayers and property owners received some wonderful news on Tuesday when, as the Sacramento Bee reported, “A Sacramento Superior

Meg's problem

I admit I’m jaded about political campaigns. I’ve been watching them closely since 1964, when I was nine and supported