CA college costs pinch budgets

university of california, wikimediaWith the University of California system in the midst of a tense tuition standoff, budgets have come under renewed pressure in recent weeks. Not only schools, but students and parents, have felt the pain.

As has been reporting, the UC system has been wracked with a series of fiscal setbacks, some self-imposed. A computer system overhaul designed to save $100 million through a $170 million investment has slipped out of budgetary control, currently two years behind schedule and $50 million in the red.

Meanwhile, UC President Janet Napolitano’s insistence on 28 percent tuition hikes over five years has spurred outrage and opposition from students across the university system as well as push-back from Gov. Jerry Brown, also a UC regent. Fueling the frustration, students and teachers alike have run up against such challenges as covering basic living costs.

Health care woes

As the Los Angeles Times reported, promises made to teachers about health care coverage have begun to go unmet:

“California Common Sense, a nonpartisan research group founded at Stanford University, estimates that state government, cities including San Francisco and Los Angeles and the University of California system contribute to $157 billion in statewide retiree health care obligations. Only about $7 billion has been set aside by those surveyed by the group, leaving $150 billion in debt.”

The problem extends throughout California governments. In a study released last December, Controller John Chiang (now the state treasurer) warned:

“The unfunded liability of providing health and dental benefits for state retirees under the current funding policy is $71.8 billion. The amount represents the present-day cost to provide benefits earned as of June 30, 2014, which is expected to be paid over the lifetime of current and future retirees.

“The total unfunded obligation grew $7.2 billion from the $64.6 billion obligation identified as of June 30, 2013.”

Faced with steep costs of living, including for health care, the student population in the Golden State has embraced the Covered California health exchange — the state’s implementation of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare.

According to California Healthline, “Researchers released poll results that show dramatically low rates of uninsured students at California State University campuses, including a steep drop in the number of Latino students without insurance.” Since October of 2013, for instance, enrollment rates at Cal State Los Angeles dropped the uninsured rate from 41 percent to just 10 percent.

Free lunch

Just as students have flocked to subsidized health care, an increasing number have sought out free food options in an effort to balance out the cost of tuition and living expenses.

At some UCs, the cost of room and board alone exceeded $14,000 a year. At UC Berkeley, where housing is the fifth most costly in the nation, according to one survey, the figure topped $15,000.

As Southern California Public Radio reported, over the past four years about half of students polled “said they skipped meals to save money ‘occasionally’ to ‘very often.’

“And at UCLA, officials distributed in the last academic year some 3,884 meal vouchers for students in dire circumstances facing a food shortage. In 2012-2013, it gave out 7,562, and 4,652 the year before that. UC Irvine has budgeted for fewer than 100 in the first year of its voucher program.”

Ironically, SCPR observed, as the result of a hunger initiative spearheaded by Napolitano, most of the UC system’s campuses now offer students the use of food pantries.

Competing priorities

The perfect storm of budgetary strains has made its impact felt in Sacramento, where lawmakers haven’t made up their minds how much more cash to allocate to the UCs.

The most recent addition to the UC system, in Merced, opened its doors in 2005. Yet Assemblyman Mike Gatto, D-Glendale, has proposed a big new investment in yet another campus. According to the Sacramento Bee:

“The Los Angeles Democrat announced a bill Monday that would set aside $50 million for a feasibility study, land acquisition and initial building costs for a ‘UC-Tech’ campus centered on science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields, as well as the arts.

“‘Now when we have these budget surpluses is the time for bold moves,’ Gatto said.”

But in all likelihood, for most Californians in and out of school, the state has already racked up enough unmet obligations.


Write a comment
  1. Dude
    Dude 16 March, 2015, 13:23

    “… $157 billion in statewide retiree health care obligations”

    The socialist state is upon us. Everybody better cash out their savings and checking accounts before Governor Moonbeam does it for you.

    Reply this comment
  2. Dawn Urbanek
    Dawn Urbanek 16 March, 2015, 14:22

    “‘Now when we have these budget surpluses is the time for bold moves,’ Gatto said.”

    Our Legislators are so out of touch with reality. There is no real “budget surplus”. The State of California has essentially been stealing from the K-12 Public Education system in order to use revenues that were promised to “the kids” to start new entitlement programs a bullet train and other worthless (to legal citizens) Drivers licenses for illegal immigrants. The State’s new education formula is intentionally designed to underfund wealthy suburban school districts so that money needed to provide a basic education is skimmed off and kept at the State. The State steels $200 million per year from the Capistrano Unified School District alone. As a tax payer- why should I allow my child to attend school in buildings that are falling down, in class sizes of 40 kids per teacher where there is no art, music or science unless parents want to fundraise for that. Students are charged all kids of illegal fees and the fundraising takes up so much time that it has begun to interfere with actual instructional minutes.

    If Mr. Gatto was fulfilling his constitutional obligation to provide a basic education for EVERY K-12 student (even the wealthy ones) there would not be any money for all the wasteful things that these out of touch legislators want to do.

    They should all be fired.

    Reply this comment
  3. Dawn Urbanek
    Dawn Urbanek 16 March, 2015, 14:28

    Was Prop 30 really a good deal for Students? Of course not.

    80% went to Employee Salaries and Benefits

    According to California Budget Fact Check:

    “California’s public schools and universities will see an actual funding increase of closer to $3 billion compared to the $6.2 billion raised by Proposition 30. The remaining revenue is dedicated to other non-education spending priorities in the Governor’s budget proposal.”

    “Other Spending Commitments” – the Elephant in the Room.

    The California Constitution

    The California Constitution mandates that the State pay for two things:
    A “Free” and “Adequate” K-12 public education system, and
    A State Militia

    No tax money should be spent for anything else until EVERY child receives adequate funding for a basic K- 12 public education.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Look for 5 Things in May Revise

MAY 13, 20211 By JOHN SEILER Next Monday, Gov. Jerry Brown will release his “May Revise” to his January budget

Anti-Israel movement faces pushback from University of California

The BDS (Boycott, Divest, Sanctions) movement has been gaining momentum at American colleges in recent years with its message that

SEIU Tax-Increase Ads Blanket State

MAY 16, 2011 By JOHN SEILER The Budget Wars begin in earnest after the release today of Gov. Jerry Brown’s